INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) performed in obese patients at our institution with the traditional technique and with the fundus-first (FF) technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 194 obese patients that underwent LC between 1994 and December 2007 at our institution. Surgical techniques were compared with respect to operative times, conversion to open cholecystectomy, postoperative complications, mortality, and length of postoperative stay. RESULTS: In the reviewed period, LC was performed in 113 (58.2%) patients with obesity type I (OTI), 55 (28.3%) patients with obesity type II (OTII), and 26 (13.5%) patients with obesity type III (OTIII). None of the differences among obese groups treated with the two techniques were statistically significant, with the exception of the lower operative times in the OTIII patients treated with the FFLC. The median operating time in the OTIII group was, respectively, 90 minutes for traditional LC and 65 (range, 45-130) for FFLC (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study achieved to conclude that LC in the obese is a safe, feasible, and efficient operation, but remains a demanding procedure even in experienced hands. FFLC can support the traditional LC in the treatment of obese patients, yielding a complication rate comparable with the traditional technique. In our study, it significantly reduced the operative time in OTIII patients, simplifying all the intra-abdominal maneuvers and the gallbladder dissection.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) performed in obesepatients at our institution with the traditional technique and with the fundus-first (FF) technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 194 obesepatients that underwent LC between 1994 and December 2007 at our institution. Surgical techniques were compared with respect to operative times, conversion to open cholecystectomy, postoperative complications, mortality, and length of postoperative stay. RESULTS: In the reviewed period, LC was performed in 113 (58.2%) patients with obesity type I (OTI), 55 (28.3%) patients with obesity type II (OTII), and 26 (13.5%) patients with obesity type III (OTIII). None of the differences among obese groups treated with the two techniques were statistically significant, with the exception of the lower operative times in the OTIII patients treated with the FFLC. The median operating time in the OTIII group was, respectively, 90 minutes for traditional LC and 65 (range, 45-130) for FFLC (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study achieved to conclude that LC in the obese is a safe, feasible, and efficient operation, but remains a demanding procedure even in experienced hands. FFLC can support the traditional LC in the treatment of obesepatients, yielding a complication rate comparable with the traditional technique. In our study, it significantly reduced the operative time in OTIII patients, simplifying all the intra-abdominal maneuvers and the gallbladder dissection.
Authors: A Agrusa; G Romano; G Cucinella; G Cocorullo; S Bonventre; G Salamone; G Di Buono; G De Vita; G Frazzetta; D Chianetta; V Sorce; G Bellanca; G Gulotta Journal: G Chir Date: 2013 Sep-Oct