Literature DB >> 23929011

Impact of Schwartz enhanced visualization solution on staging colorectal cancer and clinicopathological features associated with lymph node count.

Brandon Chapman1, Cherie Paquette, Chelsea Tooke, Michelle Schwartz, Turner Osler, Donald Weaver, Rebecca Wilcox, Neil Hyman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stage-specific survival for colon cancer improves when more lymph nodes are reported in the surgical specimen. This has led to a minimum standard of identifying 12 lymph nodes as a quality indicator.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of Schwartz solution increases node yield and impacts pathologic staging.
DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study.
SETTING: The study was conducted in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Included were 104 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lymph node counts before and after specimen treatment with Schwartz solution and incidence of upstaging were measured.
RESULTS: An additional 20 minutes (interquartile range, 15-40 minutes) was spent searching for lymph nodes, increasing the median number of nodes from 22.5 to 29.0 nodes. However, only 1 patient was upstaged. Schwartz solution decreased the number of specimens with less than 12 lymph nodes from 15 to 6. The following factors were associated with Schwartz solution leading to the detection of additional nodes: number of nodes detected initially with formalin only (p < 0.000), mesenteric fat volume (p < 0.000), mesenteric fat weight (p < 0.000), length of specimen (p < 0.016), tumor greatest dimension (p < 0.016), patient body surface area (p < 0.034), and patient age (p < 0.003). LIMITATIONS: Clinical data for this study were obtained retrospectively and were not available for all of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Although Schwartz solution increased the number of nodes detected in 95% of patients and improved compliance with the 12-node standard for colon resection, there was minimal impact on cancer staging. Upstaging is unlikely to explain the increase in overall survival in patients with higher lymph node counts, casting doubt on the validity of this process measure as a meaningful quality indicator. Rather, the lymph node count may be a reflection of inherent tumor biology or host-related factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23929011     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829c41ba

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  5 in total

1.  Activated systemic inflammatory response at diagnosis reduces lymph node count in colonic carcinoma.

Authors:  Rory P Kennelly; Brenda Murphy; John O Larkin; Brian J Mehigan; Paul H McCormick
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08-15

Review 2.  Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Märkl
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A Nomogram to Predict Adequate Lymph Node Recovery before Resection of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Zhang; Cong Li; Wei Gao; Xiao-Wei Yin; Qi-Feng Luo; Nan Liu; Shiva Basnet; Zhen-Ling Dai; Hai-Yan Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Fat clearance and conventional fixation identified ypN0 rectal cancers following intermediate neoadjuvant radiotherapy have similar long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Nan Chen; Ting-Ting Sun; Zhong-Wu Li; Yun-Feng Yao; Lin Wang; Ai-Wen Wu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-10-15

5.  A new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes in colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Shiki Fujino; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Masayuki Ohue; Aya Ito; Masayoshi Yasui; Takayuki Ogino; Hidekazu Takahashi; Mamoru Uemura; Chu Matsuda; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Nariaki Matsuura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.