Literature DB >> 23928957

Influencing factors on the effect of mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnea patients: analysis on cephalometric and polysomnographic parameters.

Young-Kyun Kim1, Jeong-Whun Kim, In-Young Yoon, Chae Seo Rhee, Chul Hee Lee, Pil-Young Yun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to evaluate clinical outcome of mandibular advancement device (MAD) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients and to estimate influencing factors on MAD effect.
METHODS: From the patients who were diagnosed as OSA by polysomnography at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from January 2007 to February 2009, the patients who chose MAD as initial treatment option were included. All the patients' data were collected by reviewing and analyzing medical record and radiograph retrospectively.
RESULTS: Eighty-six patients (76 males and 10 females; mean age of 51.5 ± 9.8 years) with OSA were included in this study. Total success rate of MAD treatment was 47.7% (41/86 patients). Among cephalometric parameters, lower facial height (35.61 ± 4.26 vs. 38.19 ± 4.89) showed significant difference between success group and non-success group. From the polysomnographic parameters, apnea index (19.79 ± 17.32 vs. 30.08 ± 23.28), average oxygen saturation (95.03 ± 1.42 vs. 94.32 ± 1.56), lowest oxygen saturation (81.44 ± 6.64 vs. 76.87 ± 7.98), oxygen saturation under 90% (4.47 ± 5.90 vs. 9.01 ± 9.29), and oxygen desaturation index (23.58 ± 17.46 vs. 37.16 ± 22.35) showed significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: From the results, it was proved that MAD was an effective treatment option for the OSA patients. Some cephalometric and polysomnographic parameters including posterior lower facial height, apnea index, average oxygen saturation, lowest oxygen saturation, oxygen saturation under 90 %, and oxygen desaturation index could be influencing factors on MAD effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23928957     DOI: 10.1007/s11325-013-0885-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep Breath        ISSN: 1520-9512            Impact factor:   2.816


  36 in total

Review 1.  Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 2.  Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults.

Authors:  T L Giles; T J Lasserson; B J Smith; J White; J Wright; C J Cates
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-01-25

3.  Principles of oral appliance therapy for the management of sleep disordered breathing.

Authors:  Alan A Lowe
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 4.  Obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  P J Strollo; R M Rogers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A modified monobloc for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Paola Cozza; Antonella Polimeni; Fabiana Ballanti
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Effect of oral appliance therapy on upper airway collapsibility in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Andrew T Ng; Helen Gotsopoulos; Jin Qian; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

Authors:  Nancy A Collop; W McDowell Anderson; Brian Boehlecke; David Claman; Rochelle Goldberg; Daniel J Gottlieb; David Hudgel; Michael Sateia; Richard Schwab
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders.

Authors:  Clete A Kushida; Michael R Littner; Max Hirshkowitz; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Brian Boehlecke; Terry M Brown; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Sheldon Kapen; Vishesh K Kapur; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer; Todd J Swick; Merrill S Wise
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  A comparison of responders and nonresponders to oral appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Ryo Otsuka; Fernanda Ribeiro de Almeida; Alan A Lowe; Frank Ryan
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cephalometric predictors of treatment outcome with mandibular advancement devices in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giulio Alessandri-Bonetti; Daniela Rita Ippolito; Maria Lavinia Bartolucci; Vincenzo D'Antò; Serena Incerti-Parenti
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 2.  3D Scanners in Orthodontics-Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maciej Jedliński; Marta Mazur; Katarzyna Grocholewicz; Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Side effects of intraoral devices for OSAS treatment.

Authors:  Andressa Otranto de Britto Teixeira; Ana Luiza Ladeia Andrade; Rhita Cristina da Cunha Almeida; Marco Antonio de Oliveira Almeida
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.