Literature DB >> 33513981

3D Scanners in Orthodontics-Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives-A Systematic Review.

Maciej Jedliński1, Marta Mazur2, Katarzyna Grocholewicz1, Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska1.   

Abstract

Background: Nowadays the use of intraoral scanners has become a routine practice in orthodontics. It allows the introduction of many treatment innovations. One should consider to what extent intraoral scanners have influenced the everyday orthodontic practice and in what direction should the further research in this field be conducted. This study is aimed to systematically review and synthesize available controlled trials investigating the accuracy and efficacy of intraoral scanners for orthodontic purpose to provide clinically useful information and to direct further research in this field.
Methods: A literature search of free text and MeSH terms was performed by using MedLine (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. The search engines were used to find studies on application of intraoral scanners in orthodontics (from 1950 to 30 September 2020). The following keywords were used: "intraoral scanners AND efficiency AND accuracy AND orthodontics".
Results: The number of potential identified articles was 71, including 61 from PubMed, two from Scopus, three from Web of Science and five from Embase. After removal of duplicates, 67 full-text articles were analyzed for inclusion criteria, 16 of them were selected and finally included in the qualitative synthesis. Conclusions: There are plenty of data available on accuracy and efficacy of different scanners. Scanners of the same generation from different manufacturers have almost identical accuracy. This is the reason why future similar research will not introduce much to the orthodontics. The challenge for the coming years is to find new applications of digital impressions in the orthodontic practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; efficiency; intraoral scanners; orthodontics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33513981      PMCID: PMC7908072          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  38 in total

1.  Automated custom-manufacturing technology in orthodontics.

Authors:  Eric Kuo; Ross J Miller
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Orthodontic study cast analysis--reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements.

Authors:  Anders P G Sjögren; Jan E Lindgren; Jan A V Huggare
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Authors:  A R Jadad; R A Moore; D Carroll; C Jenkinson; D J Reynolds; D J Gavaghan; H J McQuay
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-02

4.  CEREC CAD/CAM Chairside System.

Authors:  G Sannino; F Germano; L Arcuri; E Bigelli; C Arcuri; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2015-04-13

5.  Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; John Pham; Michael Choy; Andre Weissheimer; Harry L Dougherty; Glenn T Sameshima; Hongsheng Tong
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 6.  EAPD guidelines for use of radiographs in children.

Authors:  I Espelid; I Mejàre; K Weerheijm
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Effects of CO-CR discrepancy in daily orthodontic treatment planning.

Authors:  Carmen Maria Costea; Mîndra Eugenia Badea; Sorin Vasilache; Michaela Mesaroş
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2016-04-15

8.  Changes in views on digital intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training in digital impression taking.

Authors:  Hye-Ran Park; Ji-Man Park; Youn-Sic Chun; Kkot-Nim Lee; Minji Kim
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Validation of 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue shape, color, and irregularity with intraoral scanning.

Authors:  Julie T Deferm; Ruud Schreurs; Frank Baan; Robin Bruggink; Matthijs A W Merkx; Tong Xi; Stefaan J Bergé; Thomas J J Maal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison.

Authors:  Robert Nedelcu; Pontus Olsson; Ingela Nyström; Andreas Thor
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  3 in total

1.  Occlusal Indicators Used in Dental Practice: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Tanya Bozhkova; Nina Musurlieva; Diyan Slavchev; Mariana Dimitrova; Sevda Rimalovska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison between Digital Casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Measuring Maxillary Transverse Dimensions in Patients with Impacted Canines.

Authors:  Elena Martinez Madero; Jaime García Montarelo; Grace Stefany Aguayo; Conchita Martin
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  The Effects of Orthodontic Brackets on the Time and Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking.

Authors:  Hyojin Heo; Minji Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.