Literature DB >> 23928683

Encoding of the amplitude modulation of pulsatile electrical stimulation in the feline cochlear nucleus by neurons in the inferior colliculus; effects of stimulus pulse rate.

Douglas McCreery1, Martin Han, Victor Pikov, Kamal Yadav, Satinderpall Pannu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Persons without a functional auditory nerve cannot benefit from cochlear implants, but some hearing can be restored by an auditory brainstem implant (ABI) with stimulating electrodes implanted on the surface of the cochlear nucleus (CN). Most users benefit from their ABI, but speech recognition tends to be poorer than for users of cochlear implants. Psychophysical studies suggest that poor modulation detection may contribute to the limited performance of ABI users. In a cat model, we determined how the pulse rate of the electrical stimulus applied within or on the CN affects temporal and rate encoding of amplitude modulation (AM) by neurons in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). APPROACH: Stimulating microelectrodes were implanted chronically in and on the cats' CN, and multi-site recording microelectrodes were implanted chronically into the ICC. Encoding of AM pulse trains by neurons in the ICC was characterized as vector strength (VS), the synchrony of neural activity with the AM, and as the mean rate of neuronal action potentials (neuronal spike rate (NSR)). MAIN
RESULTS: For intranuclear microstimulation, encoding of AM as VS was up to 3 dB greater when stimulus pulse rate was increased from 250 to 500 pps, but only for neuronal units with low best acoustic frequencies, and when the electrical stimulation was modulated at low frequencies (10-20 Hz). For stimulation on the surface of the CN, VS was similar at 250 and 500 pps, and the dynamic range of the VS was reduced for pulse rates greater than 250 pps. Modulation depth was encoded strongly as VS when the maximum stimulus amplitude was held constant across a range of modulation depth. This 'constant maximum' protocol allows enhancement of modulation depth while preserving overall dynamic range. However, modulation depth was not encoded as strongly as NSR. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings have implications for improved sound processors for present and future ABIs. The performance of ABIs may benefit from using pulse rates greater than those presently used in most ABIs, and by sound processing strategies that enhance the modulation depth of the electrical stimulus while preserving dynamic range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23928683     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  9 in total

1.  Responses of neurons in the feline inferior colliculus to modulated electrical stimuli applied on and within the ventral cochlear nucleus; Implications for an advanced auditory brainstem implant.

Authors:  Douglas McCreery; Kamal Yadev; Martin Han
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Maximizing Charge Injection Limits of Iridium Oxide Electrodes with a Programmable Anodic Bias Circuit.

Authors:  Alpaslan Ersöz; Insoo Kim; Martin Han
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2021-06-02

3.  A Diagnostic Circuit for Crosstalk Detection in Microelectrode Arrays.

Authors:  Morgan McNamara; Alpaslan Ersöz; Martin Han
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2021-06-02

4.  A Simple Table-Top Technique for Multi-Signal Pseudo-Extracellular Recording.

Authors:  Martin J Niemiec; Martin Han
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2021-05

5.  Unprotected sidewalls of implantable silicon-based neural probes and conformal coating as a solution.

Authors:  Pejman Ghelich; Nicholas F Nolta; Martin Han
Journal:  Npj Mater Degrad       Date:  2021-02-10

6.  Configuring intracortical microelectrode arrays and stimulus parameters to minimize neuron loss during prolonged intracortical electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Douglas McCreery; Martin Han; Victor Pikov; Carol Miller
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  A portable neurostimulator circuit with anodic bias enhances stimulation injection capacity.

Authors:  Alpaslan Ersöz; Insoo Kim; Martin Han
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Postsurgical pathologies associated with intradural electrical stimulation in the central nervous system: design implications for a new clinical device.

Authors:  Katherine N Gibson-Corley; Oliver Flouty; Hiroyuki Oya; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  The potential of miR-183 family expression in inner ear for regeneration, treatment, diagnosis and prognosis of hearing loss.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Mahmoodian-Sani; Ameneh Mehri-Ghahfarrokhi
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-05-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.