Literature DB >> 2392834

Effect of contrast on the perceived direction of a moving plaid.

L S Stone1, A B Watson, J B Mulligan.   

Abstract

We performed a series of experiments examining the effect of contrast on the perception of moving plaids. This was done to test the hypothesis put forth by Adelson and Movshon (1982) that the human visual system determines the direction of a moving plaid in a two-staged process: decomposition into component motion followed by application of the intersection of constraints rule. Although there is recent evidence that the first tenet of their hypothesis is correct, i.e. that plaid motion is initially decomposed into the motion of the individual grating components (Movshon, Adelson, Gizzi & Newsome, 1986; Welch, 1989), the nature of the second-stage combination rule has not as yet been established. We found that when the gratings within the plaid are of different contrast, the perceived direction is not predicted by the intersection of constraints rule. There is a strong (up to 20 deg) bias in the direction of the higher-contrast grating. A revised model, which incorporates a contrast-dependent weighting of perceived grating speed as observed for 1-D patterns (Thompson, 1982), can quantitatively predict most of our results. We discuss our results in the context of various models of human visual motion processing and of physiological responses of neurons in the primate visual system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2392834     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90114-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Tom Middelburg; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Temporal factors in the discrimination of coherent motion.

Authors:  L Mowafy; J S Lappin; B L Anderson; D L Mauk
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

3.  Properties of the recombination of one-dimensional motion signals into a pattern motion signal.

Authors:  F L Kooi; K K De Valois; D H Grosof; R L De Valois
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

4.  A network model of motion processing in area MT of primates.

Authors:  R Wang
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Do component motions recombine into a moving plaid percept?

Authors:  A V van den Berg; W A van de Grind
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Magnitude of luminance modulation specifies amplitude of perceived movement.

Authors:  J Allik; A Pulver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

7.  Detection of temporal order of noise-like luminance functions.

Authors:  H P Snippe; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-01

8.  Neural computations governing spatiotemporal pooling of visual motion signals in humans.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Timothy Ledgeway; Francesca Rocchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Representation of concurrent stimuli by population activity in visual cortex.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Alex R Wade; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Efficient Coding by Midget and Parasol Ganglion Cells in the Human Retina.

Authors:  Florentina Soto; Jen-Chun Hsiang; Rithwick Rajagopal; Kisha Piggott; George J Harocopos; Steven M Couch; Philip Custer; Josh L Morgan; Daniel Kerschensteiner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.