Literature DB >> 23927522

Predicting quality of life 5 years after medical discharge for traumatic spinal cord injury.

Norma A Erosa1, Jack W Berry, Timothy R Elliott, Andrea T Underhill, Philip R Fine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study tested an a priori contextual model of the mediating effects of participation on the predictive relationships of functional impairment, family satisfaction, and pain to quality of life (QoL) following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).
DESIGN: A longitudinal design was used to study 144 persons following discharge for traumatic SCI. Predictor variables included functional impairment and family satisfaction (at 12 months post-discharge) and the presence of pain (at 24 months), and mediating variables were two indicators of participation (assessed 48 months post-discharge). Life satisfaction and self-rated health status at 60 months post-discharge were the outcome variables.
METHODS: A path model tested hypothesized prospective effects of functional impairment, family satisfaction and pain on participation and the subsequent effects of participation on the QoL variables.
RESULTS: Greater functional impairment and pain were predictive of less participation, and participation significantly predicted both indicators of QoL. The two participation variables mediated the relationship of functional impairment and pain to life satisfaction over time. Family satisfaction had an indirect effect on QoL through its association with social integration.
CONCLUSIONS: Participation appears to mediate the prospective influence of functional impairment, family satisfaction, and pain on QoL in the years following SCI. These findings provide insight into factors that can predict QoL post-SCI and support the use of contextual models to understand the temporal influence of disability and psychological variables on participation and subsequent QoL. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject? Life satisfaction and self-rated health status are important aspects of quality of life following traumatic spinal cord injury. Functional impairment has been inconsistently predictive of these variables over time. Prospective research to date has not examined the mediating effects of participation in predicting quality of life. What does this study add? The results indicate that greater functional impairment and pain are prospectively predictive of lower participation. Greater participation, in turn, is prospectively predictive of greater quality of life. Participation appears to mediate the prospective influence of functional impairment, family satisfaction, and pain to quality of life.
© 2013 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health status; life satisfaction; mobility; pain; participation; spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927522     DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  12 in total

1.  Quality of life in the subacute period following a cervical traumatic spinal cord injury based on the initial severity of the injury: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andréane Richard-Denis; Cynthia Thompson; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  A prospective study of pain and psychological functioning following traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N B Finnerup; M P Jensen; C Norrbrink; K Trok; I L Johannesen; T S Jensen; L Werhagen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Caregiver expectations of recovery among persons with spinal cord injury at three and six months post-injury: A brief report.

Authors:  Stephanie Agtarap; Emily Carl; Megan C Reynolds; Kenleigh Roden-Foreman; Monica Bennett; Evan Rainey; Mark B Powers; Simon Driver; Ann Marie Warren
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  How Do Fluctuations in Pain, Fatigue, Anxiety, Depressed Mood, and Perceived Cognitive Function Relate to Same-Day Social Participation in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury?

Authors:  Duygu Kuzu; Jonathan P Troost; Noelle E Carlozzi; Dawn M Ehde; Ivan R Molton; Anna L Kratz
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Pain, spasticity and quality of life in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury in Denmark.

Authors:  S R Andresen; F Biering-Sørensen; E M Hagen; J F Nielsen; F W Bach; N B Finnerup
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Determining priorities in functional rehabilitation related to quality of life one-year following a traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andréane Richard-Denis; Delphine Benazet; Cynthia Thompson; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Factors Influencing Incidence of Wheelchair Repairs and Consequences Among Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Lynn A Worobey; Allen W Heinemann; Kim D Anderson; Denise Fyffe; Trevor A Dyson-Hudson; Theresa Berner; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Measuring positive affect and well-being after spinal cord injury: Development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Positive Affect and Well-being bank and short form.

Authors:  Hilary Bertisch; Claire Z Kalpakjian; Pamela A Kisala; David S Tulsky
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Modeling the prospective relationships of impairment, injury severity, and participation to quality of life following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ryan J Kalpinski; Meredith L C Williamson; Timothy R Elliott; Jack W Berry; Andrea T Underhill; Philip R Fine
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Predictors of health-related quality of life after burn injuries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Inge Spronk; Catherine M Legemate; Jan Dokter; Nancy E E van Loey; Margriet E van Baar; Suzanne Polinder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.