Literature DB >> 23927364

Assessment of patient dose from CT localizer radiographs.

Bernhard Schmidt1, Natalia Saltybaeva, Daniel Kolditz, Willi A Kalender.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With recently introduced technical innovations for CT systems, the dose of CT scan acquisitions has been substantially reduced; even effective dose values below 1 mSv have been reported. Due to this development, dose of the localizer radiograph may contribute substantially to dose of the whole CT examination. Since there are only limited data in the literature regarding patient dose for the different types of localizer radiographs, patient dose values were estimated in our study by measurements and Monte Carlo simulations and compared to dose values of typical CT examinations.
METHODS: First, dose distributions were measured in anthropomorphic phantoms for three different body regions (head, thorax, abdomen-pelvic) and three positions of the x-ray tube (AP, PA, and lateral views); measured values were compared to simulated data using Monte Carlo techniques for validation purposes. Second, organ and effective dose values for the various investigated localizer radiograph scenarios were calculated and compared with published dose values for standard CT and low-dose CT examinations.
RESULTS: For the anthropomorphic phantom, deviations of the dose values between measured and calculated results were in the range of 15%. Organ and effective dose values showed a strong dependence on the tube position. The largest differences were observed for chest localizer radiographs in the female phantom for the dose to the breast (AP: 1.01 mGy vs PA: 0.24 mGy). Overall effective dose values were in the range of 0.04-0.42 mSv per localizer radiograph acquisition.
CONCLUSIONS: In view of the technical dose-reducing innovations in CT, localizer radiographs may substantially contribute to the total dose of the whole CT examination, particularly in the case of dedicated low-dose scans used, e.g., for young patients or screening purposes. Optimization of dose in localizer radiographs should be pursued further in the same way as it was done in CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927364     DOI: 10.1118/1.4813296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  Organ doses from CT localizer radiographs: Development, validation, and application of a Monte Carlo estimation technique.

Authors:  Jocelyn Hoye; Shobhit Sharma; Yakun Zhang; Wanyi Fu; Francesco Ria; Anuj Kapadia; W Paul Segars; Joshua Wilson; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Determination and verification of the x-ray spectrum of a CT scanner.

Authors:  Ahmad Ibrahim Hassan; Martin Skalej; Helmut Schlattl; Christoph Hoeschen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-07

3.  DXA-equivalent quantification of bone mineral density using dual-layer spectral CT scout scans.

Authors:  Alexis Laugerette; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Kevin Brown; Lena C Frerking; Felix K Kopp; Kai Mei; Thorsten Sellerer; Jan Kirschke; Thomas Baum; Alexandra S Gersing; Daniela Pfeiffer; Alexander A Fingerle; Ernst J Rummeny; Roland Proksa; Peter B Noël; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  0° vs. 180° CT localiser: The effect of vertical off-centring, phantom positioning and tube voltage on dose optimisation in multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Yazan Al-Hayek; Xiaoming Zheng; Rob Davidson; Christopher Hayre; Dana Al-Mousa; Campbell Finlay; Kelly Spuur
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-08-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.