Literature DB >> 23927231

Level dominance for the detection of changes in level distribution in sound streams.

Virginia M Richards1, Yi Shen, Charles Chubb.   

Abstract

Sound streams were generated by randomly choosing the levels of tone pips from two different distributions, A and B. Of the 18 tone pips, the first nine were drawn from distribution A and the second nine from distribution B, or the opposite. The listeners' task was to indicate order, A-B or B-A. In two conditions the A and B distributions differed in mean (condition 1) or variance (condition 2). In contrast to an ideal observer, listeners' strategies were consistent across the two conditions. Analyses suggest that listeners relied primarily on the more intense tone pips in making their decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927231      PMCID: PMC3732297          DOI: 10.1121/1.4813591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Observer weighting strategies in interaural time-difference discrimination and monaural level discrimination for a multi-tone complex.

Authors:  Raymond H Dye; Mark A Stellmack; Noah F Jurcin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Molecular analysis of the effect of relative tone level on multitone pattern discrimination.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The three dimensions of human visual sensitivity to first-order contrast statistics.

Authors:  Charles Chubb; Jong-Ho Nam; Daniel R Bindman; George Sperling
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Temporal limits of level dominance in a sample discrimination task (L).

Authors:  Matthew D Turner; Bruce G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Level dominance in sound source identification.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe Stoelinga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Observer efficiency and weights in a multiple observation task.

Authors:  B G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The temporal weighting of loudness: effects of the level profile.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Tina Plank
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Level dominance effect and selective attention in a dichotic sample discrimination task.

Authors:  Alison Y Tan; Bruce G Berg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sub-optimal construction of an auditory profile from temporally distributed spectral information.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Mariel Kazuko Tisby; Eli N Suzuki-Gill; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal loudness weights: Primacy effects, loudness dominance and their interaction.

Authors:  Alexander Fischenich; Jan Hots; Jesko Verhey; Julia Guldan; Daniel Oberfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.