Literature DB >> 29716301

Level dominance effect and selective attention in a dichotic sample discrimination task.

Alison Y Tan1, Bruce G Berg1.   

Abstract

Differences in individual listening patterns are reported for a dichotic sample discrimination task. Seven tones were drawn from normal distributions with means of 1000 or 1100 Hz on each trial. Even-numbered tones (2, 4, and 6) and odd-numbered tones (1, 3, 5, and 7) were drawn, respectively, from distributions with a 50-Hz and 200-Hz standard deviation. Task difficulty was manipulated by presenting odd and even tones at different intensities. In easy conditions, high and low informative tones were presented at 70 dB and 50 dB, respectively. In difficult conditions, high informative and low informative tones were presented at 50 dB and 70 dB, respectively. Participants judged whether the sample was from high- or low-mean distribution. Decision weights, efficiency, and sensitivity showed a range of abilities to attend to high informative tones, with d' from 2.4-0.7. Most listeners showed a left-ear advantage, while no listeners showed a right ear advantage. Some listeners, but not all, showed no loudness dominance effect with the ability to selectively attend to quiet tones in difficult conditions. These findings show that the influence of an attentional strategy in dichotic listening can overcome the loudness dominance effect for some listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29716301      PMCID: PMC6909989          DOI: 10.1121/1.5030919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Laterality in the perception of temporal cues of musical timbre.

Authors:  A Brancucci; P San Martini
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Informational processing of complex sound. III: interference.

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal weights in the level discrimination of time-varying sounds.

Authors:  Benjamin Pedersen; Wolfgang Ellermeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  How much masking is informational masking?

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Attentional effects in dichotic listening.

Authors:  A E Asbjørnsen; K Hugdahl
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Laterality effects in the processing of melody and timbre.

Authors:  R Boucher; M P Bryden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The temporal weighting of loudness: effects of the level profile.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Tina Plank
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Laterality effects in dichotic listening: relations with handedness and reading ability in children.

Authors:  M P Bryden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Speech perception and brain laterality: the effect of ear advantage on auditory event-related potentials.

Authors:  J Ahonniska; M Cantell; A Tolvanen; H Lyytinen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Dichotic listening in children: age-related changes in direction and magnitude of ear advantage.

Authors:  Deborah W Moncrieff
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.