Literature DB >> 23926308

Sound production mechanism in Gobius paganellus (Gobiidae).

Eric Parmentier1, Loïc Kéver, Kelly Boyle, Yves-Eric Corbisier, Ludovic Sawelew, Stefano Malavasi.   

Abstract

Gobiidae, the largest fish family (>1500 species), has species from at least 10 genera that produce sounds for communication. Studies focused on goby sound production mechanisms have suggested that sounds are produced by the forcible ejection of water through small apertures in the opercles (hydrodynamic mechanism). The present study was a multidisciplinary investigation (morphology, muscle histology, high-speed video, sound analysis and electromyography) of the sound emission mechanism in Gobius paganellus, which produces both pulsed and tonal calls. Two populations were used, from Brittany and Venice. In the French population, sounds were accompanied by a suite of coordinated movements of the buccal, branchial and opercular regions. This was not the case in the Venetian population, and thus the direct role of head movements in sound production was rejected. The hydrodynamic mechanism hypothesis was also rejected in G. paganellus on the basis of sound oscillogram shape and because sounds are still produced after the opercles and hyohyoid muscles are cut. The use of both electromyography and electron microscopy showed that the levator pectoralis muscle, which originates on the skull and inserts on the dorsal tip of the cleithrum, is involved in sound production. We propose that the contraction of this muscle and associated vibration of the large radials is used to make sounds. In addition, we propose that different sound types (pulsed sounds and tonal calls) could occur because of differences in fish size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gobiidae; call; grunt; sonic mechanism; sonic muscle; tonal

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23926308     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.087205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Environmental constraints drive the partitioning of the soundscape in fishes.

Authors:  Laëtitia Ruppé; Gaël Clément; Anthony Herrel; Laurent Ballesta; Thierry Décamps; Loïc Kéver; Eric Parmentier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Correlation between acoustic divergence and phylogenetic distance in soniferous European gobiids (Gobiidae; Gobius lineage).

Authors:  Sven Horvatić; Stefano Malavasi; Jasna Vukić; Radek Šanda; Zoran Marčić; Marko Ćaleta; Massimo Lorenzoni; Perica Mustafić; Ivana Buj; Lucija Onorato; Lucija Ivić; Francesco Cavraro; Davor Zanella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Vocalisation Repertoire of Female Bluefin Gurnard (Chelidonichthys kumu) in Captivity: Sound Structure, Context and Vocal Activity.

Authors:  Craig A Radford; Shahriman M Ghazali; John C Montgomery; Andrew G Jeffs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Characterization of the acoustic community of vocal fishes in the Azores.

Authors:  Rita Carriço; Mónica A Silva; Gui M Menezes; Paulo J Fonseca; Maria Clara P Amorim
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Sound production in piranhas is associated with modifications of the spinal locomotor pattern.

Authors:  Marine Banse; Boris P Chagnaud; Alessia Huby; Eric Parmentier; Loïc Kéver
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Contribution to the study of acoustic communication in two Belgian river bullheads (Cottus rhenanus and C. perifretum) with further insight into the sound-producing mechanism.

Authors:  Orphal Colleye; Michael Ovidio; André Salmon; Eric Parmentier
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.