Literature DB >> 25848025

Environmental constraints drive the partitioning of the soundscape in fishes.

Laëtitia Ruppé1, Gaël Clément2, Anthony Herrel3, Laurent Ballesta4, Thierry Décamps5, Loïc Kéver1, Eric Parmentier6.   

Abstract

The underwater environment is more and more being depicted as particularly noisy, and the inventory of calling fishes is continuously increasing. However, it currently remains unknown how species share the soundscape and are able to communicate without misinterpreting the messages. Different mechanisms of interference avoidance have been documented in birds, mammals, and frogs, but little is known about interference avoidance in fishes. How fish thus partition the soundscape underwater remains unknown, as acoustic communication and its organization have never been studied at the level of fish communities. In this study, passive acoustic recordings were used to inventory sounds produced in a fish community (120 m depth) in an attempt to understand how different species partition the acoustic environment. We uncovered an important diversity of fish sounds, and 16 of the 37 different sounds recorded were sufficiently abundant to use in a quantitative analysis. We show that sonic activity allows a clear distinction between a diurnal and a nocturnal group of fishes. Moreover, frequencies of signals made during the day overlap, whereas there is a clear distinction between the different representatives of the nocturnal callers because of a lack of overlap in sound frequency. This first demonstration, to our knowledge, of interference avoidance in a fish community can be understood by the way sounds are used. In diurnal species, sounds are mostly used to support visual display, whereas nocturnal species are generally deprived of visual cues, resulting in acoustic constraints being more important.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic communication; diversity of sounds; frequency partitioning; passive acoustic recordings; signal interference

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25848025      PMCID: PMC4434729          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1424667112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  Effects of ambient and boat noise on hearing and communication in three fish species living in a marine protected area (Miramare, Italy).

Authors:  Antonio Codarin; Lidia E Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich; Marta Picciulin
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Agonistic sounds in the skunk clownfish Amphiprion akallopisos: size-related variation in acoustic features.

Authors:  O Colleye; B Frederich; P Vandewalle; M Casadevall; E Parmentier
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.051

4.  Estimating cetacean population density using fixed passive acoustic sensors: an example with Blainville's beaked whales.

Authors:  Tiago A Marques; Len Thomas; Jessica Ward; Nancy DiMarzio; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of ship noise on the detectability of communication signals in the Lusitanian toadfish.

Authors:  Raquel O Vasconcelos; M Clara P Amorim; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Acoustic competition in the gulf toadfish Opsanus beta: acoustic tagging.

Authors:  Robert F Thorson; Michael L Fine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Katrin Voss; Ireen Köllmer; Dietmar Todt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Seasonal plasticity of auditory saccular sensitivity in the vocal plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Comparative study on sound production in different Holocentridae species.

Authors:  Eric Parmentier; Pierre Vandewalle; Christophe Brié; Laura Dinraths; David Lecchini
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Eleutherodactylus frogs show frequency but no temporal partitioning: implications for the acoustic niche hypothesis.

Authors:  Luis J Villanueva-Rivera
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  13 in total

1.  Soundscapes offer unique opportunities for studies of fish communities.

Authors:  Philip A Hastings; Ana Širović
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Acoustic indexes for marine biodiversity trends and ecosystem health.

Authors:  Nadia Pieretti; Roberto Danovaro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A new method for ecoacoustics? Toward the extraction and evaluation of ecologically-meaningful soundscape components using sparse coding methods.

Authors:  Alice Eldridge; Michael Casey; Paola Moscoso; Mika Peck
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Evidence for contact calls in fish: conspecific vocalisations and ambient soundscape influence group cohesion in a nocturnal species.

Authors:  L van Oosterom; J C Montgomery; A G Jeffs; C A Radford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Diversity of fish sound types in the Pearl River Estuary, China.

Authors:  Zhi-Tao Wang; Douglas P Nowacek; Tomonari Akamatsu; Ke-Xiong Wang; Jian-Chang Liu; Guo-Qin Duan; Han-Jiang Cao; Ding Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Simultaneous production of two kinds of sounds in relation with sonic mechanism in the boxfish Ostracion meleagris and O. cubicus.

Authors:  Eric Parmentier; Laura Solagna; Frédéric Bertucci; Michael L Fine; Masanori Nakae; Philippe Compère; Sarah Smeets; Xavier Raick; David Lecchini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Characterization of the acoustic community of vocal fishes in the Azores.

Authors:  Rita Carriço; Mónica A Silva; Gui M Menezes; Paulo J Fonseca; Maria Clara P Amorim
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Seabird acoustic communication at sea: a new perspective using bio-logging devices.

Authors:  Andréa Thiebault; Pierre Pistorius; Ralf Mullers; Yann Tremblay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Acoustic indices provide information on the status of coral reefs: an example from Moorea Island in the South Pacific.

Authors:  Frédéric Bertucci; Eric Parmentier; Gaël Lecellier; Anthony D Hawkins; David Lecchini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Acoustic Complexity of vocal fish communities: a field and controlled validation.

Authors:  Marta Bolgan; M Clara P Amorim; Paulo J Fonseca; Lucia Di Iorio; Eric Parmentier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.