Literature DB >> 23925703

Performance of goodness-of-fit tests for the Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying covariates.

Shannon Grant1, Ying Qing Chen, Susanne May.   

Abstract

There are few readily-implemented tests for goodness-of-fit for the Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying covariates. Through simulations, we assess the power of tests by Cox (J R Stat Soc B (Methodol) 34(2):187-220, 1972), Grambsch and Therneau (Biometrika 81(3):515-526, 1994), and Lin et al. (Biometrics 62:803-812, 2006). Results show that power is highly variable depending on the time to violation of proportional hazards, the magnitude of the change in hazard ratio, and the direction of the change. Because these characteristics are unknown outside of simulation studies, none of the tests examined is expected to have high power in real applications. While all of these tests are theoretically interesting, they appear to be of limited practical value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23925703      PMCID: PMC3918489          DOI: 10.1007/s10985-013-9277-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  9 in total

Review 1.  Time-dependent covariates in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model.

Authors:  L D Fisher; D Y Lin
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  Repeated assessment of risk factors in survival analysis.

Authors:  P K Andersen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models.

Authors:  Ralf Bender; Thomas Augustin; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Smoothing spline-based score tests for proportional hazards models.

Authors:  Jiang Lin; Daowen Zhang; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  An empirical comparison of statistical tests for assessing the proportional hazards assumption of Cox's model.

Authors:  N H Ng'andu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Covariance analysis of censored survival data.

Authors:  N Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Practical problems in fitting a proportional hazards model to data with updated measurements of the covariates.

Authors:  D G Altman; B L De Stavola
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Vitamin E and donepezil for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ronald C Petersen; Ronald G Thomas; Michael Grundman; David Bennett; Rachelle Doody; Steven Ferris; Douglas Galasko; Shelia Jin; Jeffrey Kaye; Allan Levey; Eric Pfeiffer; Mary Sano; Christopher H van Dyck; Leon J Thal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cardiac transplantation in man. VI. Prognosis of patients selected for cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  D A Clark; E B Stinson; R B Griepp; J S Schroeder; N E Shumway; D C Harrison
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 25.391

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Magnesium intake is inversely associated with risk of obesity in a 30-year prospective follow-up study among American young adults.

Authors:  Liping Lu; Cheng Chen; Kefeng Yang; Jie Zhu; Pengcheng Xun; James M Shikany; Ka He
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Effect of late-life weight change on dementia incidence: a 10-year cohort study using claim data in Korea.

Authors:  Susan Park; Soo-Min Jeon; Sun-Young Jung; Jinseub Hwang; Jin-Won Kwon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Applying two general population job exposure matrices to predict incident carpal tunnel syndrome: A cross-national approach to improve estimation of workplace physical exposures.

Authors:  Marcus Yung; Bradley A Evanoff; Skye Buckner-Petty; Yves Roquelaure; Alexis Descatha; Ann Marie Dale
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Nomograms Predicting Platinum Sensitivity, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival Using Pretreatment Complete Blood Cell Counts in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  E Sun Paik; Insuk Sohn; Sun-Young Baek; Minhee Shim; Hyun Jin Choi; Tae-Joong Kim; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  No association between low-dose aspirin use and breast cancer outcomes overall: a Swedish population-based study.

Authors:  Gabriella Frisk; Sara Ekberg; Elisabet Lidbrink; Sandra Eloranta; Malin Sund; Irma Fredriksson; Mats Lambe; Karin E Smedby
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.466

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.