| Literature DB >> 23924780 |
Mahesh S Desai1, Karoline Assig, Sharmishtha Dattagupta.
Abstract
Microbial sulfur and carbon cycles in ecosystems driven by chemoautotrophy-present at deep-sea hydrothermal vents, cold seeps and sulfidic caves-have been studied to some extent, yet little is known about nitrogen fixation in these systems. Using a comprehensive approach comprising of (15)N2 isotope labeling, acetylene reduction assay and nitrogenase gene expression analyses, we investigated nitrogen fixation in the sulfide-rich, chemoautotrophy-based Frasassi cave ecosystem (Italy). Nitrogen fixation was examined in three different microbial niches within the cave waters: (1) symbiotic bacterial community of Niphargus amphipods, (2) Beggiatoa-dominated biofilms, which occur at the sulfide-oxygen interface, and (3) sulfidic sediment. We found evidence for nitrogen fixation in all the three niches, and the nitrogenase gene (homologs of nifH) expression data clearly show niche differentiation of diazotrophic Proteobacteria within the water streams. The nifH transcript originated from the symbiotic community of Niphargus amphipods might belong to the Thiothrix ectosymbionts. Two abundantly expressed nifH genes in the Beggiatoa-dominated biofilms are closely related to those from Beggiatoa- and Desulfovibrio-related bacteria. These two diazotrophs were consistently found in Beggiatoa-dominated biofilms collected at various time points, thus illustrating species-specific associations of the diazotrophs in biofilm formation, and micron-scale niche partitioning of sulfur-oxidizing and sulfate-reducing bacteria driven by steep redox gradients within the biofilm. Finally, putative heterotrophs (Geobacter, Azoarcus and Desulfovibrio related) were the active diazotrophs in the sulfidic sediment. Our study is the first to shed light on nitrogen fixation in permanently dark caves and suggests that diazotrophy may be widespread in chemosynthetic communities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23924780 PMCID: PMC3834856 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Sampling details of Niphargus spp. (Niphargus ictus, Niphargus frasassianus and Niphargus montanarius), Beggiatoa and ɛ-Proteobacteria biofilms and sediment in the Frasassi caves
| June 2009 | RNA extraction from the whole animals, reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR amplification of | |
| July 2010 | ||
| May 2009 | ||
| May 2009 | ||
| January 2008 | ||
| January 2008 | ||
| July 2010 | Total RNA extraction, and RT-PCR amplification of 16S rRNA and | |
| February 2011 | Acetylene reduction assay | |
| May 2011 | Acetylene reduction assay, Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) and RT-PCR amplification of | |
| July 2010 | IRMS | |
| February 2011 | Acetylene reduction assay | |
| March 2011 | 15N2 isotope labeling and IRMS | |
| May 2011 | Acetylene reduction assay and IRMS | |
| July 2011 | Total RNA extraction and RT-PCR amplification of | |
Abbreviations: BG, Il Bugianardo; PC, Pozzo dei Cristalli; RS, Ramo Sulfureo; ST, Sorgente del Tunnel.
The experiments performed with the samples are mentioned in brief (for details, refer to Materials and methods). Collection locations within the Frasassi cave complex are provided in parentheses (see Bauermeister , for a cave map). In March and July 2011, no Beggiatoa biofilms were present at PC; moreover, water levels were elevated in the cave by ∼1 m as compared with the levels observed during other collections.
These samples were collected as a part of other studies and the same DNA preparations were used here (Flot ; Bauermeister ).
Phylotypes of nifH homologs obtained from different samples (Niphargus frasassianus, Niphargus montanarius, Beggiatoa-dominated biofilms and sulfidic sediment) collected at different sites in the Frasassi cave complex
| Thio1a | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 14/15 | HF565531–38 | |
| Thio1b | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 1/15 | HF565539 | |
| Thio1a | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 2/8 | HF565540 | |
| Thio1d | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 3/8 | HF565541–43 | |
| Thio1e | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 3/8 | HF565544–46 | |
| Thio1a | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 3/8 | HF565555–57 | |
| Thio1c | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 1/8 | HF565558 | |
| Thio1d | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 1/8 | HF565560 | |
| Thio1e | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 2/8 | HF565559, HF565561 | |
| Geob | 1/8 | HF565569 | ||
| Thio1a | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 6/9 | HF565547–51 | |
| Thio1c | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 2/9 | HF565552–53 | |
| Thio1d | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 1/9 | HF565554 | |
| Thio1a | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 3/7 | HF565562 | |
| Thio1c | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 3/7 | HF565563–65 | |
| Thio1d | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 1/7 | HF565566 | |
| Desulfo1a | 15/22 | HF565524–27 | ||
| Desulfo1b | 1/22 | HF565511 | ||
| Desulfo1d | 1/22 | HF565529 | ||
| Begg | 3/22 | HF565530 | ||
| Geob | 2/22 | HF565569 | ||
| Desulfo1a | 22/28 | HF565513–23 | ||
| Desulfo1c | 1/28 | HF565528 | ||
| Desulfo2 | 1/28 | HF565512 | ||
| Begg | 4/28 | HF565530 | ||
| Thio2 | γ-Proteobacteria (I) | 10/30 | HF565567 | |
| Azoarc | 4/30 | HF565568 | ||
| Geob | 12/30 | HF565569 | ||
| Desulfo3 | 4/30 | HF565570 | ||
The abundance of each phylotype (derived from cDNA or DNA) and the GenBank accession numbers of the corresponding genotypes are provided. Abbreviations of collection locations within the Frasassi caves are provided in parentheses; see Table 1 for full names. For phylogenetic positions of individual phylotypes, see Figure 2. In parentheses are the phylogenetic assignments (I or III) to the existing nifH groups (Zehr ).
For sequences showing the same amino-acid signature, representative sequences were submitted to GenBank. When nearly identical genotypes were obtained from two different samples, representatives from both libraries were submitted—such genotypes usually had >99% DNA sequence similarity.
Rates of acetylene reduction to ethylene by Beggiatoa-dominated biofilms and sulfidic sediment collected at the cave site Pozzo dei Cristalli (PC) within the Frasassi caves
| PC-BeggB | PC-BeggC | |
| Only biofilm | 3.94±0.24 | 7.18±0.61 |
| +Molybdate | NM | 0.72±0.03 |
| Sulfidic sediment | PC-SedA | PC-SedC |
| Only sediment | 3.27±0.11 | 4.40±0.37 |
| +Molybdate | NM | 4.64±0.34 |
Abbreviation: NM, not measured.
Values over an interval of 1 h and 2 h were considered for biofilm and sediment, respectively.
Analyzed with two and three replicates for samples collected in February and May, respectively.
Figure 1Bacterial uptake of 15N2 gas into the sulfidic sediment (PC-SedB; Table 1) collected at the cave site PC; error bars represent s.d. (n=2). Uptake of the isotope label by sediment sample amended with molybdate (performed only for the final time point, 120 h) is shown. The parallel experiment with the control without isotope label (also for the final time point, 120 h) displays no significant change in the δ15N value.
Figure 2Maximum-likelihood tree exhibiting the phylogenetic relationship of nifH transcripts and genes derived from Niphargus spp., Beggiatoa-dominated biofilms and sulfidic sediment within the Frasassi caves with closely related and prototypical isolates and sequences obtained from other habitats. One hundred and three unambiguously aligned amino-acid positions were considered. Sequences from this study are shown in bold; when numerous closely related phylotypes were obtained from a particular sample, the preferentially expressed phylotype is shown with arrows (see Table 2 for details). Cluster nomenclature is based on Zehr ; vertical lines denote distinct nifH Clusters, and for Cluster I, different groups are connected with dotted lines. The tree was rooted using nifH gene of Methanosarcina barkeri (GenBank accession no. AB019139), which falls in Cluster IV. Tree topology was validated by maximum-parsimony analysis; nodes with strong bootstrap values are marked (○>50% ●>70%). For tentative assignment of different phylotypes to specific bacterial groups, see Discussion.