Literature DB >> 23924773

Using implantation biopsies as a surrogate to evaluate selection criteria for living kidney donors.

Ashutosh Chauhan1, Tayyab S Diwan, Carlos R Franco Palacios, Patrick G Dean, Julie K Heimbach, George K Chow, Mikel Prieto, Fernando G Cosio, Sandra J Taler, Stephen C Textor, Yogish C Kudva, Lynn D Cornell, Mark D Stegall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The acceptance criteria used for living kidney donors are largely theoretical, as they are not clearly linked to outcomes. The goal of this study was to use implantation biopsies as a surrogate outcome marker to evaluate our living kidney donor selection criteria.
METHODS: One thousand six hundred sequential living kidney donor biopsies were performed between 2001 and 2011. Implantation biopsies were assessed by dedicated renal pathologists according to the Banff criteria. Biopsies with any chronic score of 2 or higher were deemed to have moderate to severe changes (MSC).
RESULTS: MSC was present in 4% (n=65) of implantation biopsies and occurred across a wide range of age and other demographics. By multivariate analysis, donor age (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.060 [1.035-1.086]; P<0.0001) and donor systolic blood pressure (SBP) (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.022 [1.006-1.037]; P=0.0060) were associated with MSC. Donor gender, body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, and urinary microalbuminuria were not. MSC was further increased in donors older than 60 years with SBP>140 (30% [7 of 23]) and donors older than 60 years with SBP>140 and glomerular filtration rate above the 25th percentile (42.8% [3 of 7]). In donors younger than 60 years, combining factors did not show an increased prevalence of MSC. At follow-up, renal function was similar in donors with and without MSC.
CONCLUSIONS: MSC occurred sporadically in donors with varied characteristics. Although we did not detect patterns to support specific changes in our acceptance criteria, certain subgroups of donors might benefit from close follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23924773     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a2b455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

1.  Larger nephron size, low nephron number, and nephrosclerosis on biopsy as predictors of kidney function after donating a kidney.

Authors:  Naim Issa; Lisa E Vaughan; Aleksandar Denic; Walter K Kremers; Harini A Chakkera; Walter D Park; Arthur J Matas; Sandra J Taler; Mark D Stegall; Joshua J Augustine; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Long-term Renal Function in Living Kidney Donors Who Had Histological Abnormalities at Donation.

Authors:  Lara M Fahmy; Allan B Massie; Abimereki D Muzaale; Serena M Bagnasco; Babak J Orandi; Jennifer L Alejo; Brian J Boyarsky; Saad K Anjum; Robert A Montgomery; Nabil N Dagher; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Recipient Outcomes Following Transplantation of Allografts From Live Kidney Donors Who Subsequently Developed End-Stage Renal Disease.

Authors:  A D Muzaale; A B Massie; S Anjum; C Liao; A X Garg; K L Lentine; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Live Donor Renal Anatomic Asymmetry and Posttransplant Renal Function.

Authors:  Bekir Tanriover; Sonalis Fernandez; Eric S Campenot; Jeffrey H Newhouse; Irina Oyfe; Prince Mohan; Burhaneddin Sandikci; Jai Radhakrishnan; Jennifer J Wexler; Maureen A Carroll; Sairah Sharif; David J Cohen; Lloyd E Ratner; Mark A Hardy
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.939

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.