Literature DB >> 23924423

American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale.

H Ballentine Carter1.   

Abstract

To review the process and rationale for the American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection. The AUA guideline on detection of prostate cancer involved a systematic literature review of >300 studies that evaluated outcomes important to patients (prostate cancer, incidence/mortality, health-related quality of life, diagnostic accuracy and harms of testing). A multidisciplinary panel interpreted the evidence and formulated statements to assist the urologist and the asymptomatic average-risk man in decision-making about prostate cancer detection. Other than prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening, there was no evidence to address the outcomes of interest to patients. The strongest evidence that benefits may outweigh harms was in men aged 55-69 years undergoing PSA-based screening. This led the panel to recommend shared decision-making for these men at average risk, but recommend against routine screening for other age groups at average risk. Further, to reduce the harms associated with screening (false positive tests, over diagnosis, over treatment), the panel recommended against annual screening for those who choose to be screened. A panel under the auspices of the AUA recommended shared decision-making for the average risk asymptomatic man aged 55-69 years considering PSA-based screening for prostate cancer detection.
© 2013 The Author. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PSA; early detection; prostate cancer; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23924423     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  51 in total

Review 1.  Update on age-appropriate preventive measures and screening for Canadian primary care providers.

Authors:  Tawnya Shimizu; Manon Bouchard; Cleo Mavriplis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  A multiparametric approach to improve upon existing prostate cancer screening and biopsy recommendations.

Authors:  Brian T Helfand; Carly A Conran; Jianfeng Xu; William J Catalona
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Elevated HERV-K mRNA expression in PBMC is associated with a prostate cancer diagnosis particularly in older men and smokers.

Authors:  Tiffany A Wallace; Ronan F Downey; Caleb J Seufert; Aaron Schetter; Tiffany H Dorsey; Carol A Johnson; Radoslav Goldman; Christopher A Loffredo; Peisha Yan; Francis J Sullivan; Francis J Giles; Feng Wang-Johanning; Stefan Ambs; Sharon A Glynn
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 4.  Cancer Screening in the Elderly: A Review of Breast, Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 5.  [Urinary marker-old wine in new bottles?]

Authors:  K Fischer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Factors associated with appropriate and low-value PSA testing.

Authors:  Nathaniel Oswald; Tengda Lin; Benjamin Haaland; Michael Flynn; Kensaku Kawamoto; Kathleen A Cooney; William Lowrance; Heidi A Hanson; Brock O'Neil
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Experiences of Uncertainty in Men With an Elevated PSA.

Authors:  Caitlin Biddle; Alicia Brasel; Willie Underwood; Heather Orom
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-06-23

8.  Are We Choosing Wisely? Older Adults' Cancer Screening Intentions and Recalled Discussions with Physicians About Stopping.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Louise C Walter; Sei J Lee; William Dale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Harnessing novel modalities: field carcinogenesis detection for personalizing prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Navneet Momi; Vadim Backman; Charles B Brendler; Hemant K Roy
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.

Authors:  Shivani Pahwa; Nicholas K Schiltz; Lee E Ponsky; Ziang Lu; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.