| Literature DB >> 23922634 |
Chun Wu1, Faming Gong, Pengfei Pang, Min Shen, Kangshun Zhu, Du Cheng, Zhihao Liu, Hong Shan.
Abstract
REntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23922634 PMCID: PMC3676333 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1In vitro cell transfection efficiency analysis and cell uptake analysis.
(A) The percentage of FITC-positive cells incubated with RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA, PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA or RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA in the presence of free RGD at various N/P ratios. (means±SD, n = 3; *p<0.05, compared with RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA at the same N/P ratio). (B) The laser confocal microscope images of Bel-7402 cells transfected with RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA, PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA or RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA in the presence of free RGD at a N/P ratio of 10. (×630; scale bar:10 µm).
Figure 2The cytotoxicities of various complexes in Bel-7402 cells.
The viability of Bel-7402 cells incubated with RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA, PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA, RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siNC or PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siNC at various N/P ratios. (means±SD; n = 3; *p<0.05, compared with RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA).
Figure 3Efficacy of different treatments in suppressing Survivin gene expression in Bel-7402 cells.
(A) Efficacy of RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA, PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA, RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siNC or PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siNC in suppressing Survivin gene expression in Bel-7402 cells at a N/P ratio of 10 as quantified by RT-PCR analysis (means±SD; n = 3; *p<0.05, compared with RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA; Control: the cells without transfection). (B) The expression of Survivin and cleaved caspase-3 protein in Bel-7402 cells incubated with various complexes evaluated by western blot analysis.
Figure 4The apoptotic response to different treatments in Bel-7402 cells.
(A) Images show Bel-7402 cells incubated with: RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA, PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA, RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siNC or PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siNC (×200; scale bar:100 µm) (B) Percentage of apoptotic cells induced by various complexes at N/P ratio of 10 as quantified by TUNEL analysis (means±SD; n = 3; *p<0.05, compared with RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA; Control: the cells without transfection).
Figure 5T2-mapping image of the Bel-7402 cells.
(A) T2-mapping image of the Bel-7402 cells incubated with PEG-g-PEI-SPION or RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION at different Fe concentrations. (B) T2 values of the cells incubated with various complexes at different Fe concentration. (means±SD; n = 3).
Figure 6Tumor growth inhibition analysis.
The tumor growth inhibition analysis in nude mice bearing Bel-7402 tumors after injection of various complexes formed at a N/P ratio of 10. (means±SD; n = 10; *p<0.05, compared with RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION/siRNA; Control: the mice injected with PBS).
Figure 7Ex vivo histological analyses of tumor tissue sections.
The H&E staining, immunohistochemical and TUNEL analyses of tumor tissue sections from the mice treated with various complexes formed at a N/P ratio of 10. In the immunohistochemical assay, the brown stains indicate Survivin or cleaved caspase-3 protein. In the TUNEL assay, the brown stains indicate apoptotic cells (×200; scale bar:100 µm; Control: the mice injected with PBS).
Figure 8In vivo tumor targeting evaluation.
(A) T2WI and T2-mapping images of mice bearing Bel-7402 subcutaneous tumors before and after tail vein administration of RGD-PEG-g-PEI-SPION or PEG-g-PEI-SPION. (B) The normalized MR signal intensity of the tumors before and after tail vein administration of the various complexes. (C) T2 values of the tumors before and after tail vein administration of the various complexes. (means±SD; n = 5).