Alejandro Serrablo1, Luis Tejedor. 1. Alejandro Serrablo, Medicine School of Zaragoza University, HPB Surgical Unit, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Cholangiocarcinomas are the second most frequent primary hepatic malignancy, and make up from 5% to 30% of malignant hepatic tumours. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCC) is the most common type, and accounts for approximately 60% to 67% of all cholangiocarcinoma cases. There is not a staging system that permits us to compare all series and extract some conclusions to increase the long-survival rate in this dismal disease. Neither the extension of resection, according to the sort of HCC, is a closed topic. Some authors defend limited resection (mesohepatectomy with S1, S1 plus S4b-S5, local excision for papillary tumours, etc.) while others insist in the compulsoriness of an extended hepatic resection with portal vein bifurcation removed to reach cure. As there is not an ideal adjuvant therapy, R1 resection can be justified to prolong the survival rate. Morbidity and mortality rates changed along the last decade, but variability is the rule, with morbidity and mortality rates ranging from 14% to 76% and from 0% to 19%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection continues to be the main treatment of HCC. Negative resection margins achieved with major hepatic resections are associated with improved outcome. Preresectional management with biliary drainage, portal vein embolization and staging laparoscopy should be considered in selected patients. Additional evidence is needed to fully define the role of orthotopic liver transplant. Portal and lymph node involvement worsen the prognosis and long-term survival, and surgery is the only option that can lengthen it. Improvements in adjuvant therapy are essential for improving long-term outcome. Furthermore, the lack of effective chemotherapy drugs and radiotherapy approaches leads us to can consider R1 resection as an option, because operated patients have a longer survival rate than those who not undergo surgery.
UNLABELLED: Cholangiocarcinomas are the second most frequent primary hepatic malignancy, and make up from 5% to 30% of malignant hepatic tumours. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCC) is the most common type, and accounts for approximately 60% to 67% of all cholangiocarcinoma cases. There is not a staging system that permits us to compare all series and extract some conclusions to increase the long-survival rate in this dismal disease. Neither the extension of resection, according to the sort of HCC, is a closed topic. Some authors defend limited resection (mesohepatectomy with S1, S1 plus S4b-S5, local excision for papillary tumours, etc.) while others insist in the compulsoriness of an extended hepatic resection with portal vein bifurcation removed to reach cure. As there is not an ideal adjuvant therapy, R1 resection can be justified to prolong the survival rate. Morbidity and mortality rates changed along the last decade, but variability is the rule, with morbidity and mortality rates ranging from 14% to 76% and from 0% to 19%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection continues to be the main treatment of HCC. Negative resection margins achieved with major hepatic resections are associated with improved outcome. Preresectional management with biliary drainage, portal vein embolization and staging laparoscopy should be considered in selected patients. Additional evidence is needed to fully define the role of orthotopic liver transplant. Portal and lymph node involvement worsen the prognosis and long-term survival, and surgery is the only option that can lengthen it. Improvements in adjuvant therapy are essential for improving long-term outcome. Furthermore, the lack of effective chemotherapy drugs and radiotherapy approaches leads us to can consider R1 resection as an option, because operated patients have a longer survival rate than those who not undergo surgery.
Authors: J N Vauthey; A Chaoui; K A Do; M M Bilimoria; M J Fenstermacher; C Charnsangavej; M Hicks; G Alsfasser; G Lauwers; I F Hawkins; J Caridi Journal: Surgery Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Helmut Witzigmann; Frieder Berr; Ulrike Ringel; Karel Caca; Dirk Uhlmann; Konrad Schoppmeyer; Andrea Tannapfel; Christian Wittekind; Joachim Mossner; Johann Hauss; Marcus Wiedmann Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Alan W Hemming; Robin D Kim; Kristin L Mekeel; Shiro Fujita; Alan I Reed; David P Foley; Richard J Howard Journal: Am Surg Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Mohamed Abd ElWahab; Ayman El Nakeeb; Ehab El Hanafy; Ahmad M Sultan; Ahmed Elghawalby; Waleed Askr; Mahmoud Ali; Mohamed Abd El Gawad; Tarek Salah Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-06-27
Authors: T M Lodewick; P H Alizai; R M van Dam; A A J Roeth; M Schmeding; C Heidenhain; A Andert; N Gassler; C H C Dejong; U P Neumann Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Benjamin Juntermanns; Gernot Maximillian Kaiser; Henning Reis; Silvia Gries; Stefan Kasper; Andreas Paul; Ali Canbay; Christian Dominik Fingas Journal: Turk J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: B Juntermanns; C D Fingas; G C Sotiropoulos; D Jaradat; A Dechêne; H Reis; S Kasper; A Paul; G M Kaiser Journal: Chirurg Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Valery Hrad; Yoftahe Abebe; Syed Haris Ali; Jared Velgersdyk; Mohammed Al Hallak; Mohamad Imam Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2016-06-19 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: Sven H Loosen; Christoph Roderburg; Katja L Kauertz; Alexander Koch; Mihael Vucur; Anne T Schneider; Marcel Binnebösel; Tom F Ulmer; Georg Lurje; Wenzel Schoening; Frank Tacke; Christian Trautwein; Thomas Longerich; Cornelis H Dejong; Ulf P Neumann; Tom Luedde Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 4.379