Literature DB >> 16875081

Portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Alan W Hemming1, Robin D Kim, Kristin L Mekeel, Shiro Fujita, Alan I Reed, David P Foley, Richard J Howard.   

Abstract

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains a difficult challenge for the surgeon. Achieving negative surgical margins when resecting this relatively uncommon tumor is technically demanding as a result of the close proximity of the bile duct bifurcation to the vascular inflow of the liver. A recent advance in surgical treatment is the addition of portal vein resection to the procedure. Resection of the portal vein increases the number of patients offered a potentially curative approach but is technically more difficult and may increase the risk of the procedure. This study reviews the results of portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Between 1998 and 2005, 60 patients underwent potentially curative resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Mean patient age was 64 +/- 12 years (range, 24-85 years). Liver resections performed along with biliary resection included 49 trisegmentectomies (37 right, 12 left) and 10 lobectomies (8 left, 2 right). One patient had only the bile duct resected. Four patients also had simultaneous pancreaticoduodenectomy performed. Twenty-six patients required portal vein resection and reconstruction to achieve negative margins, 3 of which also required reconstruction of the hepatic artery. Operative mortality was 8 per cent with an overall complication rate of 40 per cent. Patients who underwent portal vein resection had an operative mortality of 4 per cent, which was not different from the 12 per cent mortality in patients who did not undergo portal vein resection (P = 0.39). There was no difference in actuarial patient survival between patients who underwent portal vein resection and those who did not (5-year survival 39 per cent vs. 41 per cent, P = not significant). Negative margins were achieved in 80 per cent of cases and were associated with improved survival (P < 0.01). Five-year actuarial survival in patients undergoing resection with negative margins was 45 per cent. There was no difference in margin status or long-term survival between those patients who underwent portal vein resection and those who did not. Only negative margin status was associated with improved survival by multivariate analysis. Portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma is safe and allows a chance for long-term survival in otherwise unresectable patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16875081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  21 in total

Review 1.  Review article: surgical, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant management strategies in biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  J R A Skipworth; S W M Olde Damink; C Imber; J Bridgewater; S P Pereira; M Malagó
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Bile duct surgery in the treatment of hepatobiliary and gallbladder malignancies: effects of hepatic and vascular resection on outcomes.

Authors:  Perry Shen; Nora Fino; Edward A Levine; Pamela Eversole; Clancy Clark
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Radical surgery: vascular and pancreatic resection for cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Y Nimura
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009.

Authors:  Murad Aljiffry; Mark J Walsh; Michele Molinari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  The Surgical Management of Klatskin Tumours: Has Anything Changed in the Last Decade?

Authors:  Neil Bhardwaj; Giuseppe Garcea; Ashley R Dennison; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Evolving role of vascular resection and reconstruction in hepatic surgery for malignancy.

Authors:  Kristin L Mekeel; Alan W Hemming
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 7.  Surgical resection techniques for locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sanjay Govil; Mettu Srinivas Reddy; Mohamed Rela
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Surgical management trends for cholangiocarcinoma in the USA 1998-2009.

Authors:  Jamie E Anderson; Alan W Hemming; David C Chang; Mark A Talamini; Kristin L Mekeel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas: surgical treatment.

Authors:  Satoshi Kondo; Tadahiro Takada; Masaru Miyazaki; Shuichi Miyakawa; Kazuhiro Tsukada; Masato Nagino; Junji Furuse; Hiroya Saito; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Masakazu Yamamoto; Masato Kayahara; Fumio Kimura; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Satoshi Nozawa; Masahiro Yoshida; Keita Wada; Satoshi Hirano; Hodaka Amano; Fumihiko Miura
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-02-16

10.  Flowcharts for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas.

Authors:  Shuichi Miyakawa; Shin Ishihara; Tadahiro Takada; Masaru Miyazaki; Kazuhiro Tsukada; Masato Nagino; Satoshi Kondo; Junji Furuse; Hiroya Saito; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Fumio Kimura; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Satoshi Nozawa; Masahiro Yoshida; Keita Wada; Hodaka Amano; Fumihiko Miura
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.