Literature DB >> 23918397

State-dependent climate sensitivity in past warm climates and its implications for future climate projections.

Rodrigo Caballero1, Matthew Huber.   

Abstract

Projections of future climate depend critically on refined estimates of climate sensitivity. Recent progress in temperature proxies dramatically increases the magnitude of warming reconstructed from early Paleogene greenhouse climates and demands a close examination of the forcing and feedback mechanisms that maintained this warmth and the broad dynamic range that these paleoclimate records attest to. Here, we show that several complementary resolutions to these questions are possible in the context of model simulations using modern and early Paleogene configurations. We find that (i) changes in boundary conditions representative of slow "Earth system" feedbacks play an important role in maintaining elevated early Paleogene temperatures, (ii) radiative forcing by carbon dioxide deviates significantly from pure logarithmic behavior at concentrations relevant for simulation of the early Paleogene, and (iii) fast or "Charney" climate sensitivity in this model increases sharply as the climate warms. Thus, increased forcing and increased slow and fast sensitivity can all play a substantial role in maintaining early Paleogene warmth. This poses an equifinality problem: The same climate can be maintained by a different mix of these ingredients; however, at present, the mix cannot be constrained directly from climate proxy data. The implications of strongly state-dependent fast sensitivity reach far beyond the early Paleogene. The study of past warm climates may not narrow uncertainty in future climate projections in coming centuries because fast climate sensitivity may itself be state-dependent, but proxies and models are both consistent with significant increases in fast sensitivity with increasing temperature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hyperthermal; superrotation

Year:  2013        PMID: 23918397      PMCID: PMC3761583          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1303365110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  Warm tropical sea surface temperatures in the Late Cretaceous and Eocene epochs.

Authors:  P N Pearson; P W Ditchfield; J Singano; K G Harcourt-Brown; C J Nicholas; R K Olsson; N J Shackleton; M A Hall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The role of carbon dioxide during the onset of Antarctic glaciation.

Authors:  Mark Pagani; Matthew Huber; Zhonghui Liu; Steven M Bohaty; Jorijntje Henderiks; Willem Sijp; Srinath Krishnan; Robert M DeConto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A transient rise in tropical sea surface temperature during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum.

Authors:  James C Zachos; Michael W Wara; Steven Bohaty; Margaret L Delaney; Maria Rose Petrizzo; Amanda Brill; Timothy J Bralower; Isabella Premoli-Silva
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Warmer paleotemperatures for terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kowalski; David L Dilcher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Are there pre-Quaternary geological analogues for a future greenhouse warming?

Authors:  Alan M Haywood; Andy Ridgwell; Daniel J Lunt; Daniel J Hill; Matthew J Pound; Harry J Dowsett; Aisling M Dolan; Jane E Francis; Mark Williams
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Giant boid snake from the Palaeocene neotropics reveals hotter past equatorial temperatures.

Authors:  Jason J Head; Jonathan I Bloch; Alexander K Hastings; Jason R Bourque; Edwin A Cadena; Fabiany A Herrera; P David Polly; Carlos A Jaramillo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Climate change. A hotter greenhouse?

Authors:  Matthew Huber
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years.

Authors:  P N Pearson; M R Palmer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Climate sensitivity constrained by CO2 concentrations over the past 420 million years.

Authors:  Dana L Royer; Robert A Berner; Jeffrey Park
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  18 in total

1.  Hot climates, high sensitivity.

Authors:  R T Pierrehumbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates.

Authors:  K D Burke; J W Williams; M A Chandler; A M Haywood; D J Lunt; B L Otto-Bliesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Placing our current 'hyperthermal' in the context of rapid climate change in our geological past.

Authors:  Gavin L Foster; Pincelli Hull; Daniel J Lunt; James C Zachos
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability.

Authors:  Steven Ghan; Minghuai Wang; Shipeng Zhang; Sylvaine Ferrachat; Andrew Gettelman; Jan Griesfeller; Zak Kipling; Ulrike Lohmann; Hugh Morrison; David Neubauer; Daniel G Partridge; Philip Stier; Toshihiko Takemura; Hailong Wang; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Plio-Pleistocene climate sensitivity evaluated using high-resolution CO2 records.

Authors:  M A Martínez-Botí; G L Foster; T B Chalk; E J Rohling; P F Sexton; D J Lunt; R D Pancost; M P S Badger; D N Schmidt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Spatial patterns of climate change across the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum.

Authors:  Jessica E Tierney; Jiang Zhu; Mingsong Li; Andy Ridgwell; Gregory J Hakim; Christopher J Poulsen; Ross D M Whiteford; James W B Rae; Lee R Kump
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 7.  An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence.

Authors:  S C Sherwood; M J Webb; J D Annan; K C Armour; P M Forster; J C Hargreaves; G Hegerl; S A Klein; K D Marvel; E J Rohling; M Watanabe; T Andrews; P Braconnot; C S Bretherton; G L Foster; Z Hausfather; A S von der Heydt; R Knutti; T Mauritsen; J R Norris; C Proistosescu; M Rugenstein; G A Schmidt; K B Tokarska; M D Zelinka
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.946

8.  The latitudinal temperature gradient and its climate dependence as inferred from foraminiferal δ18O over the past 95 million years.

Authors:  Daniel E Gaskell; Matthew Huber; Charlotte L O'Brien; Gordon N Inglis; R Paul Acosta; Christopher J Poulsen; Pincelli M Hull
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Equatorial heat accumulation as a long-term trigger of permanent Antarctic ice sheets during the Cenozoic.

Authors:  Maxime Tremblin; Michaël Hermoso; Fabrice Minoletti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Changing atmospheric CO2 concentration was the primary driver of early Cenozoic climate.

Authors:  Eleni Anagnostou; Eleanor H John; Kirsty M Edgar; Gavin L Foster; Andy Ridgwell; Gordon N Inglis; Richard D Pancost; Daniel J Lunt; Paul N Pearson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.