BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of acute complicated sigmoid diverticulitis is still under debate while elective treatment of recurrent diverticulitis has proven benefits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and histological outcome of acute and elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy in patients with diverticulitis. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted where 197 patients were analyzed undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection for acute complicated diverticulitis and recurrent diverticulitis. Single-stage laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis were routinely performed using a 3-trocar technique. Recorded data included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-score, operative time, duration of hospital stay, complications, and histological results. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients received laparoscopy for acute diverticular disease (group I) and 93 patients underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis (group II). M/F ratio was 49:42 for group I and 37:56 for group II. Mean operative time and hospital stay was similar in both groups. Majority of patients were ASA II in both groups. Rate of minor complications was 14.3 % in group I and 7.5 % in group II. Major complications were 2.2 % for acute treatment and 4.3 % for elective resections. No anastomotic leakage and no mortality occurred. In 32.3 % of the patients of elective group II, destruction of the colonic wall with pericolic abscess, fistulization, or fibrinoid purulent peritonitis were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for acute diverticular disease is safe and effective. Continuing bowl inflammations in histological specimens justify sigmoid resection in elective patients, but more effective pre-operative parameters need to be found to identify patients that would benefit from surgery during the initial episode.
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of acute complicated sigmoid diverticulitis is still under debate while elective treatment of recurrent diverticulitis has proven benefits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and histological outcome of acute and elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy in patients with diverticulitis. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted where 197 patients were analyzed undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection for acute complicated diverticulitis and recurrent diverticulitis. Single-stage laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis were routinely performed using a 3-trocar technique. Recorded data included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-score, operative time, duration of hospital stay, complications, and histological results. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients received laparoscopy for acute diverticular disease (group I) and 93 patients underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis (group II). M/F ratio was 49:42 for group I and 37:56 for group II. Mean operative time and hospital stay was similar in both groups. Majority of patients were ASA II in both groups. Rate of minor complications was 14.3 % in group I and 7.5 % in group II. Major complications were 2.2 % for acute treatment and 4.3 % for elective resections. No anastomotic leakage and no mortality occurred. In 32.3 % of the patients of elective group II, destruction of the colonic wall with pericolic abscess, fistulization, or fibrinoid purulent peritonitis were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for acute diverticular disease is safe and effective. Continuing bowl inflammations in histological specimens justify sigmoid resection in elective patients, but more effective pre-operative parameters need to be found to identify patients that would benefit from surgery during the initial episode.
Authors: Vasilis A Constantinides; Paris P Tekkis; Thanos Athanasiou; Omer Aziz; Sanjay Purkayastha; Feza H Remzi; Victor W Fazio; Nail Aydin; Ara Darzi; Asha Senapati Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: B J M van de Wall; W A Draaisma; E C J Consten; R T van der Kaaij; M J Wiezer; I A M J Broeders Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Nicolas A Rotholtz; Miguel Montero; Mariano Laporte; Maximiliano Bun; Sandra Lencinas; Norberto Mezzadri Journal: World J Surg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Marty Zdichavsky; Frank A Granderath; Gunnar Blumenstock; Michael Kramer; Markus A Küper; Alfred Königsrainer Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Markus Alexander Küper; Friederike Eisner; Alfred Königsrainer; Jörg Glatzle Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Marcel Binnebösel; Tim Schuler; Christian D Klink; Daniel Busch; Dominik S Schöb; Klaus T von Trotha; Ulf P Neumann; Karsten Junge Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Gabrio Bassotti; Vincenzo Villanacci; Angelo Sidoni; Riccardo Nascimbeni; Maria P Dore; Gian A Binda; Roberto Bandelloni; Marianna Salemme; Rachele Del Sordo; Moris Cadei; Alessandra Manca; Nunzia Bernardini; Christoph A Maurer; Gieri Cathomas Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Ulrich Wirth; Josefine Schardey; Thomas von Ahnen; Petra Zimmermann; Florian Kühn; Jens Werner; Hans Martin Schardey; Bettina M Rau; Julia Gumpp Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Sandra Vennix; Daniel J Lips; Salomone Di Saverio; Bart A van Wagensveld; Walter J Brokelman; Michael F Gerhards; Anna A van Geloven; Susan van Dieren; Johan F Lange; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 4.584