Literature DB >> 23916075

Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape.

B Drerup1, E Hierholzer.   

Abstract

Video rasterstereography is a method for back surface measurement comprising automatic back surface reconstruction and shape analysis. It is particularly appropriate for the examination of scoliosis. In this application shape analysis includes model-based calculations of vertebral rotation (determined from surface rotation) and of the spinal midline in three dimensions. The results are delivered in quasi-real time (computing time < 5 min). The aim of the present study was to validate the method by comparison of rasterstereographic and radiographic data. Anteroposterior radiographs and rasterstereographs (478) of 113 scoliosis patients were analysed, each pair taken on the same day. Matching the radiographic midline of the spine to its rasterstereographic equivalent, the deviations between the two curves are properly expressed by their root mean square (r.m.s.) deviation. A r.m.s. deviation in the order of 4 mm was found. Similarly, the r.m.s. deviation of vertebral rotation from surface rotation was about 3°. No systematic difference of vertebral and surface rotation, as reported by other authors, could be found. This may be attributed to our method of data evaluation, consisting of a sophisticated analysis of surface curvature and shape asymmetry. These mathematical procedures are made possible by the high sampling density and resolution of video rasterstereography. Conventional scoliosis parameters (e.g. Cobb angle, apical rotation, apex height, etc.) can be estimated with limited accuracy from the reconstructed midline. The relevant standard deviations are given.
Copyright © 1994. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 23916075     DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(94)90055-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  35 in total

Review 1.  [Radiation-free diagnosis of scoliosis : An overview of the surface and spine topography].

Authors:  M Betsch; M Wild; B Rath; M Tingart; A Schulze; V Quack
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Reply to the letter to the editor of L. Russo et al. concerning "Relationship between sagittal spinal curves geometry and isokinetic trunk muscle strength in adults" by W. Elsayed, A. Farrag, Q. Muaidi, N. Almulhim (2018) Eur Spine J 27:2014-2022.

Authors:  Walaa Hamdy Elsayed; Ahmed Taha Farrag; Qassim Ibrahim Muaidi; Nora Ahmed Almulhim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Formetric rasterstereography: a new perspective. Reply to Padulo and Ardigó.

Authors:  M Krause; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Spinal postural changes during the modified Matthiass test in healthy children : Interday and interrater reliability of dynamic rasterstereographic measurements.

Authors:  Inke Marie Albertsen; Kristina Dettmann; Kornelia Babin; Ralf Stücker; Jan Schröder; Astrid Zech; Karsten Hollander
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Preliminary opto-electronic study on vertebral movement.

Authors:  G Vanneuville; T Kyndt; M Massaux; Y Harmand; J M Garcier; J P Monnet; M Guillot; P Cluzel; G Escande; G Poumarat
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Video raster stereography back shape reconstruction: a reliability study for sagittal, frontal, and transversal plane parameters.

Authors:  J Schroeder; R Reer; K M Braumann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Is there any use? Validity of 4D rasterstereography compared to EOS 3D X-ray imaging in patients with degenerative disk disease.

Authors:  L Wanke-Jellinek; O Heese; A Krenauer; C Würtinger; C J Siepe; K Wiechert; C Mehren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Spinal alignment in low back pain patients and age-related side effects: a multivariate cross-sectional analysis of video rasterstereography back shape reconstruction data.

Authors:  J Schroeder; H Schaar; K Mattes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Sagittal back contour and craniofacial morphology in preadolescents.

Authors:  Carsten Lippold; Emil Segatto; András Végh; Burkhard Drerup; Tatjana Moiseenko; Gholamreza Danesh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A new system for measuring three-dimensional back shape in scoliosis.

Authors:  Fiona Berryman; Paul Pynsent; Jeremy Fairbank; Simon Disney
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.