Literature DB >> 23616202

Spinal alignment in low back pain patients and age-related side effects: a multivariate cross-sectional analysis of video rasterstereography back shape reconstruction data.

J Schroeder1, H Schaar, K Mattes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spinal form in the sagittal plane and asymmetries of spinal alignment in the frontal plane were identified earlier to be associated with low back pain. This study was aiming at investigating whether age was influencing the significance of these findings.
METHODS: Spinal alignment of 155 older and 58 younger low back pain patients was investigated using non-invasive video rasterstereography and compared to 192 pain free controls. Trunk inclination and imbalance, pelvis tilt and torsion, and the thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angle served as dependent variables, which were analyzed using multivariate procedures.
RESULTS: Frontal plane parameters-trunk imbalance (λ > 0.60) in combination with pelvis tilt (λ > 0.64)-constituted an independent component in a factor analysis model of spine shape parameters in younger and older patients, but not in pain free controls. Trunk imbalance (frontal), trunk inclination (sagittal) and partially thoracic kyphosis angle (sagittal) were extracted to separate patients from controls (discriminant coefficients >0.50). Age could not be excluded as interfering variable for the lumbar lordosis angle. Significant univariate analyses revealed higher effect sizes for trunk imbalance and inclination (η (2) > 0.07) than for lordosis, kyphosis or pelvic parameters (η (2) < 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: In line with corresponding findings trunk imbalance remained a low back pain-associated parameter not depending on age. Over all, sagittal trunk inclination and the thoracic kyphosis angle could not be established as being completely free from age influences, while the lumbar lordosis angle played a minor role and seemed to be influenced more by age than by low back pain in this rasterstereography study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23616202      PMCID: PMC3777053          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2787-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Personal risk factors for first-time low back pain.

Authors:  M A Adams; A F Mannion; P Dolan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain.

Authors:  R P Jackson; T Kanemura; N Kawakami; C Hales
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Movement of the human pelvis and displacement of related anatomical landmarks on the body surface.

Authors:  B Drerup; E Hierholzer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Automatic localization of anatomical landmarks on the back surface and construction of a body-fixed coordinate system.

Authors:  B Drerup; E Hierholzer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Changes in the sagittal spinal alignment of the elderly without vertebral fractures: a minimum 10-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Naoki Takeda; Tetsuya Kobayashi; Yuji Atsuta; Takeo Matsuno; Osamu Shirado; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Are radiologic changes in the thoracic and lumbar spine of adolescents risk factors for low back pain in adults? A 25-year prospective cohort study of 640 school children.

Authors:  M Harreby; K Neergaard; G Hesselsøe; J Kjer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Body posture in elderly, physically active males.

Authors:  B Ostrowska; K Rozek-Mróz; C Giemza
Journal:  Aging Male       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.892

8.  Correlation between backpack weight and way of carrying, sagittal and frontal spinal curvatures, athletic activity, and dorsal and low back pain in schoolchildren and adolescents.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Georgios Koureas; Zisis Papazisis
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-02

9.  Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape.

Authors:  B Drerup; E Hierholzer
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Classification of sagittal thoraco-lumbo-pelvic alignment of the adolescent spine in standing and its relationship to low back pain.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Peter O'Sullivan; Leon Straker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Development of an Experimental Animal Model for Lower Back Pain by Percutaneous Injury-Induced Lumbar Facet Joint Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jae-Sung Kim; Kasra Ahmadinia; Xin Li; John L Hamilton; Steven Andrews; Chris A Haralampus; Guozhi Xiao; Hong-Moon Sohn; Jae-Won You; Yo-Seob Seo; Gary S Stein; Andre J Van Wijnen; Su-Gwan Kim; Hee-Jeong Im
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.384

2.  A method to quantify the "cone of economy".

Authors:  Ram Haddas; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Spinal form and function profile: reference values for clinical use in low back pain].

Authors:  J Schröder; K M Braumann; R Reer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Decreased Vertical Trunk Inclination Angle and Pelvic Inclination as the Result of Mid-High-Heeled Footwear on Static Posture Parameters in Asymptomatic Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jakub Michoński; Marcin Witkowski; Bożena Glinkowska; Robert Sitnik; Wojciech Glinkowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.