| Literature DB >> 23914189 |
Abstract
During the last decade, a variety of monoclonal antibodies have been developed and used as molecular targeting drugs in medical therapies. Although antibody drugs tend to have intense pharmacological activities and negligible side effects, several issues in their development and prescription remain to be resolved. Synthetic peptides with affinities and specificities for a desired target have received significant attention as alternatives to antibodies. In vitro display technologies are powerful methods for the selection of such peptides from combinatorial peptide libraries. Various types of peptide binders are being selected with such technologies for use in a wide range of fields from bioscience to medicine. This mini review article focuses on the current state of in vitro display selection of synthetic peptide binders and compares the selected peptides with natural peptides/proteins to provide a better understanding of the target affinities and inhibitory activities derived from their amino acid sequences and structural frameworks. The potential of synthetic peptide binders as alternatives to antibody drugs in therapeutic applications is also reviewed.Entities:
Keywords: antibody drug; in vitro display technology; peptide binder; peptide therapeutic; target binding
Year: 2013 PMID: 23914189 PMCID: PMC3730117 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Essential components and schemes for . (A) Scheme of phage display selection of peptide binders. Bacteriophages linking combinatorial peptides as phenotype with their plasmid DNAs (pDNAs) as genotype are produced in E. coi. A library of peptides displayed on the pIII coat proteins is panned against target-coated substrates. Then, target binding phages are selected and their pDNA sequences are analyzed to identify desirable peptide binders. (B) Upper panel: DNA constructs used for E. coli ribosome display technology. T7 promoter and RBS are necessary for in vitro transcription and translation, respectively. The coding sequences for CPL are inserted between suitable restriction sites and are followed by the coding sequence for FPS. Lower panel: cycle scheme of E. coli ribosome display selection of peptide binders. (1) DNA constructs are transcribed in vitro by T7 RNA polymerase to synthesize mRNAs. (2) The resulting mRNA pool is translated in vitro by a cell-free protein synthesis system extracted from E. coli to generate a library of ternary complex that contains CPL, ribosome, and mRNA. Since each mRNA encodes the sequence of the CPL fused to FPS without stop codons, which result in stalling of the ribosomes on mRNA, CPL–ribosome–mRNA complexes can be formed. (3) After mixing the complexes and target-coated beads/plates, desirable complexes that display peptides bound to target molecules are selected. (4) The mRNAs are recovered by dissociation of the selected complexes through the addition of EDTA. (5) The purified mRNAs are reverse-transcribed in vitro to synthesize cDNAs, and subsequently amplified by PCR. These resulting DNA constructs are directly used for the next selection cycle, or are analyzed by cloning and sequencing to identify new peptide binders. (C) Scheme of cDNA display selection of peptide binders. (1) The puromycin (p) and biotin (b) attached DNA linker is ligated with the 3′ end of mRNA encoding combinatorial peptide. (2) After immobilization of the construct through binding of biotin to streptavidin-coated surfaces (St-CS), in vitro synthesized peptide binds to the puromycin and the mRNA is subsequently transcribed to generate a peptide–cDNA–mRNA complex. (3) Digestion of restriction sites in the DNA linkers affords a library consisting of peptide–cDNA–mRNA complexes. (4) Through screen of the library against cells of interest, target binding complexes are recovered and their cDNA sequences are analyzed to identify desirable peptide binders.