PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of a novel "split dynamic" method in which high temporal and high spatial resolution dynamic MR images are acquired during a single bolus injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High temporal resolution images were acquired using a three-dimensional (3D) dual-echo EPI sequence. The high spatial resolution images were acquired using a 3D T1 -weighted turbo field echo sequence. Simulations were performed to test the split dynamic method in terms of accuracy relative to a continuous acquisition and for temporal sampling requirements for accurate estimation of kinetic parameters. The method was tested in four patients where pharmacokinetic parameters were extracted from the high temporal resolution data. RESULTS: The split dynamic method enabled quantitative evaluation of both T1- and T2*-weighted characteristics. Simulations showed that splitting the dynamic acquisition does not significantly influence the reliability of parameter estimations. Simulation showed a required temporal resolution of 13, 16, and 8 s for accurate estimates of Ktrans, ve, and vp, respectively, and an optimal sampling interval between 2 and 6 s for peak R2*. CONCLUSION: The split dynamic sequence enabled detailed assessment of dynamic T1- and T2*-weighted contrast kinetics without compromising guidelines concerning spatial resolution.
PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of a novel "split dynamic" method in which high temporal and high spatial resolution dynamic MR images are acquired during a single bolus injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High temporal resolution images were acquired using a three-dimensional (3D) dual-echo EPI sequence. The high spatial resolution images were acquired using a 3D T1 -weighted turbo field echo sequence. Simulations were performed to test the split dynamic method in terms of accuracy relative to a continuous acquisition and for temporal sampling requirements for accurate estimation of kinetic parameters. The method was tested in four patients where pharmacokinetic parameters were extracted from the high temporal resolution data. RESULTS: The split dynamic method enabled quantitative evaluation of both T1- and T2*-weighted characteristics. Simulations showed that splitting the dynamic acquisition does not significantly influence the reliability of parameter estimations. Simulation showed a required temporal resolution of 13, 16, and 8 s for accurate estimates of Ktrans, ve, and vp, respectively, and an optimal sampling interval between 2 and 6 s for peak R2*. CONCLUSION: The split dynamic sequence enabled detailed assessment of dynamic T1- and T2*-weighted contrast kinetics without compromising guidelines concerning spatial resolution.
Authors: Kine Mari Bakke; Endre Grøvik; Sebastian Meltzer; Anne Negård; Stein Harald Holmedal; Lars Tore G Mikalsen; Lars Gustav Lyckander; Anne H Ree; Kjell-Inge Gjesdal; Kathrine R Redalen; Atle Bjørnerud Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Leonidas Georgiou; Nisha Sharma; David A Broadbent; Daniel J Wilson; Barbara J Dall; Anmol Gangi; David L Buckley Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 4.668