Comparison of the clinical efficacy of temozolomide (TMZ) versus nimustine (ACNU)-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Although temozolomide (TMZ) replaced nitrosoureas as the standard initial chemotherapy for glioblastoma (GBM), no studies have compared TMZ with nimustine (ACNU), a nitrosourea agent widely used in central Europe and most Asian regions. One hundred thirty-five patients with GBM who underwent extensive tumor resection in our institution received both radiation and chemotherapy as initial treatment, 34 received TMZ and 101 ACNU-based (ACNU plus teniposide or cisplatin) chemotherapy. Efficacy analysis included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The following prognostic factors were taken into account: age, performance status, extent of resection, and O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene status. The median OS was superior in the TMZ versus the ACNU group (p = 0.011), although MGMT gene silencing, which is associated with a striking survival benefit from alkylating agents, was more frequent in the ACNU group. In multivariate Cox analysis adjusting for the common prognostic factors, TMZ chemotherapy independently predicted a favorable outcome (p = 0.002 for OS, hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; p = 0.011 for PFS, HR, 0.56). Given that >40 % of patients in ACNU group did not receive the intensive chemotherapy cycles because of severe hematological and nonhematological toxicity, we performed a further subanalysis for patients who received at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Although a modest improvement in survival occurred in this ACNU subgroup, the efficacy was still inferior to that in the TMZ cohort. Our data suggest that the survival benefit of TMZ therapy is superior to that of an ACNU-based regimen in patients with extensive tumor resection, also shows greater tolerability.