Literature DB >> 23912067

Selective manipulation of target identification demands in visual search: the role of stimulus contrast in CDA activations.

Thomas Töllner1, Markus Conci, Tessa Rusch, Hermann J Müller.   

Abstract

In classic visual pop-out search, response times are slowed remarkably when participants are required to precisely identify (e.g., vertical vs. horizontal orientation) as compared to simply localize (e.g., left vs. right position) a feature singleton target. This cost associated with stimulus identification has been recently proposed (Töllner, Rangelov, & Müller, 2012) to derive from the engagement of postselective recurrent processes that via feedback connections extract the information required for motor-response selection. Here, we examined whether the contralateral delay activity (CDA), an asymmetric neural marker generally assumed to reflect active maintenance of stimulus information in visual short-term memory (vSTM), may further index the degree of postselective processing requirements in visual search. Employing a compound-search task, we selectively manipulated the ease/difficulty of identifying the response-critical target orientation attribute (horizontal vs. vertical)--irrespective of the target-defining color feature (red vs. green)--by introducing different levels of stimulus-background contrast. As expected, we found a monotonic reaction time increase to be associated with gradually increasing CDA magnitudes as the stimulus contrast decreased. Thus, our findings provide direct evidence that CDA activations provide a useful tool to estimate the amount of postselective recurrent processing recruited to extract detailed object information from vSTM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; electroencephalography; recurrent processing; stimulus contrast

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23912067     DOI: 10.1167/13.3.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

1.  Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Markus Conci; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  What are task-sets: a single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations?

Authors:  Dragan Rangelov; Thomas Töllner; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  From Capture to Inhibition: How does Irrelevant Information Influence Visual Search? Evidence from a Spatial Cuing Paradigm.

Authors:  Christine Mertes; Edmund Wascher; Daniel Schneider
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Individuation of objects and object parts rely on the same neuronal mechanism.

Authors:  Marlene Poncet; Alfonso Caramazza; Veronica Mazza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Age-related changes in visual search: manipulation of colour cues based on cone contrast and opponent modulation space.

Authors:  Shuto Tamura; Keiko Sato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  What pops out in positional priming of pop-out: insights from event-related EEG lateralizations.

Authors:  Ahu Gokce; Thomas Geyer; Kathrin Finke; Hermann J Müller; Thomas Töllner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-02

7.  Contextual cueing of visual search is associated with greater subjective experience of the search display configuration.

Authors:  Bernhard Schlagbauer; Manuel Rausch; Michael Zehetleitner; Hermann J Müller; Thomas Geyer
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2018-03-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.