Literature DB >> 23911560

Lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer study (LiLACS): Phase III clinical trial comparing surgical with radiologic staging in patients with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer.

Michael Frumovitz1, Denis Querleu2, Antonio Gil-Moreno3, Philippe Morice4, Anuja Jhingran5, Mark F Munsell6, Homer A Macapinlac7, Eric Leblanc8, Alejandra Martinez2, Pedro T Ramirez9.   

Abstract

Radiation treatment planning for women with locally advanced cervical cancer (stages IB2-IVA) is often based on positron emission tomography (PET). PET, however, has poor sensitivity in detecting metastases in aortocaval nodes. We have initiated a study with the objective of determining whether pre-therapeutic laparoscopic surgical staging followed by tailored chemoradiation improves survival as compared with PET/computed tomography (CT) radiologic staging alone followed by chemoradiation. This international, multicenter phase III trial will enroll 600 women with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer and PET/CT findings showing fluorodeoxyglucose-avid pelvic nodes and fluorodeoxyglucose-negative para-aortic nodes. Eligible patients will be randomized to undergo either pelvic radiotherapy with chemotherapy (standard-of-care arm) or surgical staging via a minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach followed by tailored radiotherapy with chemotherapy (experimental arm). The primary end point is overall survival. Secondary end points are disease-free survival, short- and long-term morbidity with pre-therapeutic surgical staging, and determination of anatomic locations of metastatic para-aortic nodes in relationship to the inferior mesenteric artery. We believe this study will show that tailored chemoradiation after pre-therapeutic surgical staging improves survival as compared with chemoradiation based on PET/CT in women with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer.
Copyright © 2014 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervix; Laparoscopy; PET/CT; Surgical staging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911560      PMCID: PMC4283493          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  22 in total

1.  Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Scheidler; H Hricak; K K Yu; L Subak; M R Segal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  M A Varia; B N Bundy; G Deppe; R Mannel; H E Averette; P G Rose; P Connelly
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Anatomic location of PET-positive aortocaval nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: implications for surgical staging.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Pedro T Ramirez; Homer A Macapinlac; Ann H Klopp; Alpa M Nick; Lois M Ramondetta; Anuja Jhingran
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Morris; P J Eifel; J Lu; P W Grigsby; C Levenback; R E Stevens; M Rotman; D M Gershenson; D G Mutch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Laura J Havrilesky; Shalini L Kulasingam; David B Matchar; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  B A Goff; H G Muntz; P J Paley; H K Tamimi; W J Koh; B E Greer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic and common iliac dissection in the staging of bulky or advanced cervical carcinomas.

Authors:  D Querleu; D Dargent; Y Ansquer; E Leblanc; F Narducci
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prophylactic extended-field irradiation of para-aortic lymph nodes in stages IIB and bulky IB and IIA cervical carcinomas. Ten-year treatment results of RTOG 79-20.

Authors:  M Rotman; T F Pajak; K Choi; M Clery; V Marcial; P W Grigsby; J Cooper; M John
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-08-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Predictive value of computerized tomography in the presurgical evaluation of primary carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  L Camilien; D Gordon; R G Fruchter; M Maiman; J G Boyce
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01.

Authors:  Patricia J Eifel; Kathryn Winter; Mitchell Morris; Charles Levenback; Perry W Grigsby; Jay Cooper; Marvin Rotman; David Gershenson; David G Mutch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Does para-aortic irradiation reduce the risk of distant metastasis in advanced cervical cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Lucas Gomes Sapienza; Maria José Leite Gomes; Vinicius Fernando Calsavara; Mario M Leitao; Glauco Baiocchi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Triptolide induces protective autophagy and apoptosis in human cervical cancer cells by downregulating Akt/mTOR activation.

Authors:  Guangyi Qin; Ping Li; Zhuowei Xue
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?

Authors:  Fatih Gucer; Selim Misirlioglu; Nuri Ceydeli; Cagatay Taskiran
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-03-02

Review 4.  Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic-Assisted Aortic Lymph-Nodal Staging for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mariano Catello Di Donna; Vincenzo Giallombardo; Giuseppina Lo Balbo; Giuseppe Cucinella; Giulio Sozzi; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Antonino Abbate; Antonio Simone Laganà; Simone Garzon; Vito Chiantera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Prognostic Value and Therapeutic Implication of Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Paraaortic Staging in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Spanish Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Berta Díaz-Feijoo; Aureli Torné; Álvaro Tejerizo; Virginia Benito; Alicia Hernández; Rubén Ruiz; Santiago Domingo; Rocío Luna-Guibourg; Antonio Llueca; Pluvio Coronado; Juan Gilabert-Estelles; Vicente Bebia; Blanca Gil-Ibáñez; Antonio Gil-Moreno
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Para-aortic lymph node involvement in cervical cancer: Implications for staging, outcome and treatment.

Authors:  T S Shylasree; Lavanya Gurram; Ushashree Das
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

Review 7.  Advances in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic cervical cancer.

Authors:  Haoran Li; Xiaohua Wu; Xi Cheng
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  Para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced stage cervical cancer, a protocol for comparing safety, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of surgical staging versus PET-CT; PALDISC trial.

Authors:  Casper Tax; Karin Abbink; Maroeska M Rovers; Ruud L M Bekkers; Petra L M Zusterzeel
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-01-04

Review 9.  Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  SEOM guidelines for cervical cancer.

Authors:  A Oaknin; M J Rubio; A Redondo; A De Juan; J F Cueva Bañuelos; M Gil-Martin; E Ortega; A Garcia-Arias; A Gonzalez-Martin; I Bover
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.