Literature DB >> 10479506

Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.

B A Goff1, H G Muntz, P J Paley, H K Tamimi, W J Koh, B E Greer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical staging in the treatment and outcome of women with locally advanced cervical cancer.
METHODS: Ninety-eight women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated between 1993 and 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival probabilities were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and compared with the log-rank test.
RESULTS: Of the 98 women treated over the 5-year period, 86 were surgically staged: 61 by a retroperitoneal approach, 18 by laparoscopy, and 7 by laparotomy. Median blood loss was 120 cc and median length of hospitalization was 3 days. Preoperative CT scans (n = 55), when compared with surgical findings, missed macroscopic nodal disease in 20% and microscopic disease in 15% and overcalled disease in 10% of cases. Lymph node metastases were found in 45/86 patients (52%): 12 microscopic and 33 macroscopic. The highest level of nodes found to be involved was pelvic in 23, common iliac nodes in 3, para-aortic nodes in 14, and scalene nodes in 5 cases. Of the 86 patients, 49 received pelvic radiation, 27 received extended field radiation, and 10 were identified for palliative treatment only (5 scalene node metastasis, 5 extensive intraperitoneal disease). For node-negative patients, 5-year survival was 74%; for microscopic nodal involvement it was 58%; and for macroscopic involvement it was 39% (P = 0.007). Five-year survival for women with para-aortic node involvement was 52%. Number of nodes involved was a significant prognostic variable (P = 0.008). Patients who received chemotherapy had a 5-year survival of 68% compared to 35% for those who did not (P = 0.06). Factors which did not affect survival included age, histology, type of surgery, stage, and type of radiation (pelvic vs extended).
CONCLUSION: Surgical staging of women with locally advanced cervical cancer can be performed with acceptable morbidity and it provided more accurate information than CT scans and resulted in a modification of the standard pelvic radiation field for 43% of our patients. The information obtained from surgical staging allows better individualization of therapy, which may improve overall clinical outcome. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479506     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  22 in total

1.  Survival benefit of laparoscopic surgical staging-guided radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Dae Gy Hong; Nae Yoon Park; Gun Oh Chong; Young Lae Cho; Il Soo Park; Yoon Soon Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 2.  Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Elly Brockbank; Fani Kokka; Andrew Bryant; Christophe Pomel; Karina Reynolds
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

3.  Obesity does not affect the number of retrieved lymph nodes and the rate of intraoperative complications in gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Mehmet Coskun Salman; Alp Usubutun; Tulay Ozlu; Kubra Boynukalin; Kunter Yuce
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Anuja Jhingran; Homer A Macapinlac; Elizabeth D Euscher; Mark F Munsell; Robert L Coleman; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael Frumovitz; Lois M Ramondetta
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Surgical Staging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Current Status and Research Progress.

Authors:  He Zhang; Weimin Kong; Shuning Chen; Xiaoling Zhao; Dan Luo; Yunkai Xie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  The abandoned radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: clinical predictors and outcomes.

Authors:  Heidi J Gray; Erin Seifert; Victor G Sal Y Rosas; Katrina F Nicandri; Wui-Jin Koh; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-04-28

7.  Lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer study (LiLACS): Phase III clinical trial comparing surgical with radiologic staging in patients with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Denis Querleu; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Philippe Morice; Anuja Jhingran; Mark F Munsell; Homer A Macapinlac; Eric Leblanc; Alejandra Martinez; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  The evaluation of older patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ying Gao; Jin-lu Ma; Fei Gao; Li-ping Song
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 9.  Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Elly Brockbank; Fani Kokka; Andrew Bryant; Christophe Pomel; Karina Reynolds
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

10.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-II B cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Dae G Hong; Nae Y Park; Gun O Chong; Young L Cho; Il S Park; Yoon S Lee; Dae Hyung Lee
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.