Literature DB >> 23911429

Long-term ECG monitoring using an implantable loop recorder for the detection of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with atrial flutter.

Suneet Mittal1, Evgeny Pokushalov, Alexander Romanov, Martha Ferrara, Aysha Arshad, Dan Musat, Mark Preminger, Tina Sichrovsky, Jonathan S Steinberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial flutter who undergo cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, long-term electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring may identify new onset of atrial fibrillation (AF).
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain, through the use of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) with a dedicated AF detection algorithm, the incidence, duration, and burden of new AF in these patients and to develop an optimal postablation ECG monitoring strategy.
METHODS: We enrolled 20 patients with flutter, a CHADS2 score of 2-3, and no prior episode of AF. After cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, we implanted an ILR, which was interrogated routinely; all stored ECGs were adjudicated.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 382 ± 218 days, 3 patterns were observed. First, in 11 (55%) patients, stored ECGs confirmed AF at 62 ± 38 days after ablation. Second, in 4 (20%) patients, although the ILR suggested AF, episodes actually represented sinus rhythm with frequent premature atrial contractions and/or oversensing. Third, in 5 (25%) patients, no AF was observed. Episodes <4 hours were associated with low AF burden (<1%) or false detections. The 1-year freedom from any episode of AF >4 and >12 hours was 52% and 83%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that many (but not all) patients develop new AF within the first 4 months of flutter ablation. Since external ECG monitoring for this duration is impractical, the ILR has an important role for long-term AF surveillance. Future research should be directed toward identifying the relationship between duration/burden of AF and stroke and improving existing ILR technology.
© 2013 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AF; Atrial fibrillation; Atrial flutter; CTI; Catheter ablation; Cavotricuspid isthmus; ECG; ILR; Implantable loop recorder; PPV; atrial fibrillation; cavotricuspid isthmus; electrocardiographic; implantable loop recorder; positive predictive value

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911429     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.07.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  17 in total

Review 1.  Current rare indications and future directions for implantable loop recorders.

Authors:  Simon Wechselberger; Christopher Piorkowski; Matthias Pohl
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-12

2.  AF Detected on Implanted Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Is There a Threshold for Thromboembolic Risk?

Authors:  Motaz Baibars; Khalil Kanjwal; Joseph E Marine
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-03

3.  Submuscular implantation of insertable cardiac monitors improves the reliability of detection of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Leonard Bergau; Christian Sohns; Samuel Sossalla; Pascal Muñoz-Exposito; Lars Luethje; Markus Zabel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  The Role of Implantable Cardiac Monitors in Atrial Fibrillation Management.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ciconte; Daniele Giacopelli; Carlo Pappone
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-08-31

5.  Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in African Americans post Atrial Flutter Ablation.

Authors:  Robert L Percell; Robert Helm; Kevin Monahan
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2020-02-28

6.  Risk and outcome after ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter in elderly patients.

Authors:  Béatrice Brembilla-Perrot; Jean Marc Sellal; Arnaud Olivier; Vladimir Manenti; Thibault Villemin; Daniel Beurrier; Christian De Chillou; Zohra Lamiral; Nicolas Girerd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?

Authors:  Javier García-Seara; Francisco Gude Sampedro; Jose L Martínez Sande; Xesus Alberte Fernández López; Moisés Rodríguez Mañero; Laila González Melchor; Belén Alvarez Alvarez; Diego Iglesias Alvarez; José Ramón González Juanatey
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2016-06-01

8.  Adapting detection sensitivity based on evidence of irregular sinus arrhythmia to improve atrial fibrillation detection in insertable cardiac monitors.

Authors:  Helmut Pürerfellner; Prashanthan Sanders; Shantanu Sarkar; Erin Reisfeld; Jerry Reiland; Jodi Koehler; Evgeny Pokushalov; Luboš Urban; Lukas R C Dekker
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Coronary Sinus Electrograms May Predict New-onset Atrial Fibrillation After Typical Atrial Flutter Radiofrequency Ablation (CSE-AF).

Authors:  Usama Boles; Enes Elvin Gul; Andres Enriquez; Neasa Starr; Sohaib Haseeb; Hoshiar Abdollah; Christopher Simpson; Adrian Baranchuk; Damian Redfearn; Kevin Michael; Wilma Hopman; Benedict Glover
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-06-30

10.  Value of Implantable Loop Recorders in Monitoring Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Lijin Pu; Liuqing Yang; Fang Li; Zhiling Luo; Tao Guo; Baotong Hua; Shumin Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.