Literature DB >> 23910887

Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical training--the Robotic Skills Assessment Score.

Ashirwad J Chowriappa1, Yi Shi, Syed Johar Raza, Kamran Ahmed, Andrew Stegemann, Gregory Wilding, Jihad Kaouk, James O Peabody, Mani Menon, James M Hassett, Thenkurussi Kesavadas, Khurshid A Guru.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A standardized scoring system does not exist in virtual reality-based assessment metrics to describe safe and crucial surgical skills in robot-assisted surgery. This study aims to develop an assessment score along with its construct validation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All subjects performed key tasks on previously validated Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery curriculum, which were recorded, and metrics were stored. After an expert consensus for the purpose of content validation (Delphi), critical safety determining procedural steps were identified from the Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery curriculum and a hierarchical task decomposition of multiple parameters using a variety of metrics was used to develop Robotic Skills Assessment Score (RSA-Score). Robotic Skills Assessment mainly focuses on safety in operative field, critical error, economy, bimanual dexterity, and time. Following, the RSA-Score was further evaluated for construct validation and feasibility. Spearman correlation tests performed between tasks using the RSA-Scores indicate no cross correlation. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed between the two groups.
RESULTS: The proposed RSA-Score was evaluated on non-robotic surgeons (n = 15) and on expert-robotic surgeons (n = 12). The expert group demonstrated significantly better performance on all four tasks in comparison to the novice group. Validation of the RSA-Score in this study was carried out on the Robotic Surgical Simulator.
CONCLUSION: The RSA-Score is a valid scoring system that could be incorporated in any virtual reality-based surgical simulator to achieve standardized assessment of fundamental surgical tents during robot-assisted surgery.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Robotic skills assessment; Robotic training; Score; Scoring system; Surgical training

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23910887     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  17 in total

1.  Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alyssa Tanaka; Courtney Graddy; Khara Simpson; Manuela Perez; Mireille Truong; Roger Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.

Authors:  Justin D Bric; Derek C Lumbard; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Total Mesorectal Excision Technique-Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Joep Knol; Deborah S Keller
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-04-28

4.  A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education.

Authors:  Richard Chen; Priscila Rodrigues Armijo; Crystal Krause; Ka-Chun Siu; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The Heidelberg VR Score: development and validation of a composite score for laparoscopic virtual reality training.

Authors:  Mona W Schmidt; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Marc L Schmidt; Erica Wennberg; Carly R Garrow; Sang Paik; Laura Benner; Marlies P Schijven; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparative analysis of the functionality of simulators of the da Vinci surgical robot.

Authors:  Roger Smith; Mireille Truong; Manuela Perez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Proctorship and mentoring: Its backbone and application in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Glen Denmer Santok; Ali Abdel Raheem; Lawrence Hc Kim; Kidon Chang; Byung Ha Chung; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-11-28

Review 8.  Review of automated performance metrics to assess surgical technical skills in robot-assisted laparoscopy.

Authors:  Sonia Guerin; Arnaud Huaulmé; Vincent Lavoue; Pierre Jannin; Krystel Nyangoh Timoh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices.

Authors:  Carlo C Passerotti; Felipe Franco; Julio C C Bissoli; Bruno Tiseo; Caio M Oliveira; Carlos A O Buchalla; Gustavo N C Inoue; Arzu Sencan; Aydin Sencan; Rogerio Ruscitto do Pardo; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.