Literature DB >> 23910018

Comparison of bicarbonate-buffered fluid and isotonic saline solution as Cell Saver washing fluids for packed red blood cells.

Dirk Huber1, Lars Witt, Robert Sümpelmann, Larissa Heinze, Thomas Müller, Ralf Lichtinghagen, Wilhelm A Osthaus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Massive transfusion (MT) can cause severe electrolyte and acid-base disturbances in neonates and infants due to the unphysiological composition of packed red blood cells (PRBCs). Washing of the PRBCs using Cell Saver systems prior to MT is recommended for this reason. AIM: The composition of normal saline (NaCl), the standard wash fluid for Cell Saver systems, is considerably different from that of physiological plasma. The aim of the study presented here was to investigate the effect of washing the PRBCs with a bicarbonate-buffered hemofiltration solution (BB-HS) in comparison with washing with NaCl and to evaluate the impact on electrolyte concentrations, acid-base balance and the stability of PRBCs.
METHODS: In an experimental in vitro setting, PRBCs were washed with Cell Saver systems prepared with NaCl or BB-HS as washing solutions. Before and after the washing procedure, electrolyte concentrations, acid-base parameters, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and free hemoglobin (fHb) concentrations were measured.
RESULTS: In both groups, the potassium concentrations decreased (baseline: 18.4 ± 5.17 mmol·l(-1), end of study: NaCl 2.71 ± 1,81 mmol·l(-1), BB-HS 2.50 ± 1.54 mmol·l(-1), P < 0.05) while the acid-base balance improved only in the BB-HS-group (baseline: base excess -21.6 ± 3.52 mmol·l(-1), end of study: NaCl -30.2 ± 1.42 mmol·l(-1), BB-HS -7.51 ± 2.49 mmol·l(-1) , P < 0.05). Furthermore, markers of erythrocyte stability such as fHb and ATP concentrations were improved in the BB-HS-group.
CONCLUSIONS: Washing of PRBCs with BB-HS rather than NaCl results in a more physiological composition with improvements of electrolyte concentrations, acid-base balance and erythrocyte stability.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell Saver; buffered washing solution; erythrocyte stability; massive transfusion; osmotic resistance; packed red blood cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23910018     DOI: 10.1111/pan.12232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  7 in total

1.  The Impact of Three Different Wash Solutions on Autotransfusion Products.

Authors:  Todd M Ratliff; Jeffery L Burnside; Ashley B Hodge; Aymen N Naguib; Daniel Gomez
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2018-06

Review 2.  0.9% NaCl (Normal Saline) - Perhaps not so normal after all?

Authors:  Neil Blumberg; Jill M Cholette; Anthony P Pietropaoli; Richard Phipps; Sherry L Spinelli; Michael P Eaton; Suzie A Noronha; Jerard Seghatchian; Joanna M Heal; Majed A Refaai
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 1.764

3.  Intraoperative Cell Saving: Is the Solution the Actual Problem?

Authors:  Krishnan Pillay; Shobashini Perumal
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2021-03

4.  In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Hemoglobin and Electrolytes Following the Collection of Cell Saver Blood Washed with Either Normal Saline or Plasma-Lyte A.

Authors:  Jill M Cholette; Hannah L McRae; Ron Angona; Christine Cahill; Michael F Swartz; George M Alfieris; Majed A Refaai
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2021-09

5.  [Improved quality of stored packed red blood cells by mechanical rinsing].

Authors:  F Münch; A Purbojo; F Wenzel; M Kohl; S Dittrich; M Rauh; R Zimmermann; N Kwapil
Journal:  Anaesthesiologie       Date:  2022-08-15

6.  Effects of potassium adsorption filters on the removal of ammonia from blood products.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fujita; Yoko Shiotani; Yuko Takada; Shigeko Nishimura
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.443

7.  Electrolyte and acid/base changes in dogs undergoing autologous blood transfusion via a cell salvage device.

Authors:  Jodie L Lamb; Kelley M Thieman Mankin; Gwendolyn J Levine; James Thompson
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.008

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.