Literature DB >> 23908655

Expression of recombinant antibodies.

André Frenzel1, Michael Hust, Thomas Schirrmann.   

Abstract

Recombinant antibodies are highly specific detection probes in research, diagnostics, and have emerged over the last two decades as the fastest growing class of therapeutic proteins. Antibody generation has been dramatically accelerated by in vitro selection systems, particularly phage display. An increasing variety of recombinant production systems have been developed, ranging from Gram-negative and positive bacteria, yeasts and filamentous fungi, insect cell lines, mammalian cells to transgenic plants and animals. Currently, almost all therapeutic antibodies are still produced in mammalian cell lines in order to reduce the risk of immunogenicity due to altered, non-human glycosylation patterns. However, recent developments of glycosylation-engineered yeast, insect cell lines, and transgenic plants are promising to obtain antibodies with "human-like" post-translational modifications. Furthermore, smaller antibody fragments including bispecific antibodies without any glycosylation are successfully produced in bacteria and have advanced to clinical testing. The first therapeutic antibody products from a non-mammalian source can be expected in coming next years. In this review, we focus on current antibody production systems including their usability for different applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fungi; insect cells; mammalian cell; procaryotes; recombinant antibody; transgenic organisms; yeast

Year:  2013        PMID: 23908655      PMCID: PMC3725456          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

Today, antibodies are used for several applications in research, diagnostics, and therapy. They are used in many standard assays such as immunoblot, flow cytometry, or immunohistochemistry. In addition this, the emerging field of proteome research has a huge need of binders against different protein antigens and splice variants (1, 2). Moreover, recombinant antibodies are used for the diagnosis of different pathogens (3–5) or toxins (6, 7). In the past decade, several antibodies for therapeutic applications have been developed (8, 9), primarily targeting inflammatory or tumor diseases (10). In 2010, sales of approved therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in the USA and EU reached 50 billion US dollars (11). For the detection of different antigens, polyclonal antibodies are widely used in research and diagnostics. These sera contain a large and diverse amount of different antibodies with unknown specificities. However, polyclonal non-human antibodies may exhibit an immune response in human beings that hampers the therapeutic use for example after snake bites (12). Therefore, the production of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) by hybridoma technology was a significant milestone (13) for the generation of antibodies for therapeutic use. As this technology is based on the fusion of antibody producing spleen cells from immunized mice or rats with immortal myeloma cell lines, its main obstacle is the inefficient immune response to highly toxic or conserved antigens. In addition, nearly all antibodies which are currently in clinical development are of human-origin or at least humanized in some aspect (9, 14, 15) to prevent immunogenicity. Consequently, transgenic animals, especially mice, have been developed which contain a human immunoglobulin gene repertoire (16, 17) solving the problem of immunogenicity but not the need of an efficient immune response after immunization. Finally, in vitro selection technologies such as antibody phage display or ribosomal display provide a solution for the generation of human antibodies (18–22). These new antibody generation technologies have increased the amount of antibodies for different applications and, therefore, also the need of efficient production systems. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is a heterotetrameric molecule consisting of two heavy and two light chains, respectively, which are connected via disulfide bonds. Heavy and light chains (HC and LC) also contain intramolecular disulfide bonds for stabilization (23). These structural properties require a sophisticated folding apparatus as well as an oxidizing environment for the generation of disulfide bonds. Consequently, many traditionally expression hosts do not provide these mechanisms for efficient production of IgGs. Therefore, smaller antibody fragments have been developed which combine easier production with full antigen binding capacity of an IgG (Figure 1). In addition, the development of smaller fragments was the basis for most of the in vitro antibody generation systems (18–22). These antibody fragments can be used for applications, where epitope binding is sufficient for the desired effect including therapeutic applications such as virus neutralization or receptor blocking.
Figure 1

Recombinant antibody formats for different applications compared to IgG. Red and dark red: variable regions; blue: constant regions; green: artificial peptide linkers; yellow: dHLX represents amphiphatic helices used for dimerization of scFv fragments.

Recombinant antibody formats for different applications compared to IgG. Red and dark red: variable regions; blue: constant regions; green: artificial peptide linkers; yellow: dHLX represents amphiphatic helices used for dimerization of scFv fragments. The smallest antigen binding fragment of immunoglobulins maintaining its complete antigen binding site is the Fv fragment, which consists only of variable (V) regions. A soluble and flexible amino acid peptide linker is used to connect the V regions to a scFv (single chain fragment variable) fragment for stabilization of the molecule (24), or the constant (C) domains are added to the V regions to obtain a Fab fragment (Figure 1). Today, scFv and Fab are the most widely used antibody fragments which are produced in prokaryotes. Other antibody formats have been produced in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, for example, disulfide-bond stabilized scFv (ds-scFv) (25), single chain Fab fragments (scFab) combining scFv and Fab properties (26) as well as di- and multimeric antibody formats like dia-, tria-, or tetra-bodies (27, 28) or minibodies (miniAbs) comprising different formats consisting of scFvs linked to oligomerization domains like immunoglobulin CH3 domain (28), leucin zipper, helix turn helix motif streptavidin, or scFv-scFv tandems (29–31). Bispecific antibody formats combine two different antigen binding domains in one molecule (32–34). The smallest antibody fragments are VHHs of cameloide heavy chain antibodies (35) and single domain antibodies (dAb) (36, 37). For most therapeutic applications, the Fc moiety of an immunoglobulin is essential for the method of action as it mediates the effector functions such as cellular dependent cytotoxicity or the activation of the complement system. Therefore, antibody fragments have been fused to the Fc domain to regain effector functions and avidity (38, 39). Figure 1 depicts some of these antibody formats that have been developed for different applications.

Antibody Production in Prokaryotic Hosts

Gram-negative bacteria

Escherichia coli is the most important production system for recombinant proteins reaching volumetric yields in the gram per liter scale for extracellular production (40–42). For production of functional antibody fragments, the key to success was the secretion of both V chains into the periplasmic space of E. coli where the oxidizing environment allows the correct formation of disulfide bonds and the assembly to a functional Fv fragment (43). This strategy also allowed the first expression of functional Fab fragments in E. coli described in 1988 (44). The production of recombinant antibodies in the reducing cytoplasmic compartment results mostly in non-functional aggregates (45). Recovery of functional antibody fragments from cytoplasmic inclusion bodies by complete denaturation and refolding (46) is often not efficient. Stable cysteine free mutants of some scFvs were successfully produced in the cytoplasm of E. coli (47, 48). E. coli strains with mutations in the glutathione and thioredoxin reductase in combination with coexpression of cytoplasmic chaperones GroEL/ES, trigger factor, DnaK/J as well as signal sequence-less variants of periplasmic chaperones DsbC and Skp increased the yield of functional Fab (49). For the production of camelid single domain antibodies (VHH), coexpression of Erv1p sulfhydryl oxidase increased the yield in the cytoplasm (50). Despite these efforts, most antibody fragments are produced in the periplasm of E. coli using N-terminal leader sequences targeting the periplasmic Sec pathway (51), for example signal peptides derived from outer membrane protein A (OmpA), alkaline phosphatase A (PhoA), or pectate lyase B (PelB) (52–54). Also the SRP pathway can be used for antibody fragment production (55). After expression, recombinant antibodies are usually isolated from the periplasmic fraction (56, 57) but also from the culture supernatant (58–61). The yield of functional scFv fragments has been improved by co- or overexpression of GroES/L, peptidyl prolyl-cis,trans-isomerase FkPa, or other folding helper proteins (62–66). Functional expression can also be increased by optimization of cultivation parameters, such as temperature, media, or additives. Here, the optimal parameters are dependent on the individual antibody fragment (58, 67). The production system itself influences the production rate. Very high yields of antibody fragments produced in E. coli are mainly provided by high-cell density fermentation in bioreactors: the expression of a hapten-specific scFv produced in a bioreactor (68) lead to yields up to 1.2 g/L compared to 16.5 mg/L yield of the same antibody obtained by optimized shake flask production (69), which can be mostly addressed to the over 100-fold higher cell density in the bioreactor. A recent production system is the LEX bubble column bioreactor. Yields in the LEX system of an anti-MUC1 scFv was ∼30–40× higher and yields of an anti-lysozyme antibody was about 2× higher compared to shake flask incubation (67, 70). E. coli strain optimization, e.g., plasmid stability, can additionally improve production yield (71). The Fab format requires expression, periplasmic transport, correct folding, and assembly of two different polypeptide chains. Among the different vector formats and arrangements, bicistronic vectors with the first cistron encoding the light chain and the second cistron encoding the Fd fragment are optimal (56). Even aglycosylated full-size IgGs were successfully produced in E. coli (72, 73). In our view, the raison d’être of complete IgG production in E. coli is doubtful. Cell wall-less L-forms of the Gram-negative bacterium Proteus mirabilis were used for the production of miniAbs and scFv (30, 74), but yield of total scFv and of functional scFv were different and ranged from 83 to 127 mg/L of total scFv to just 9–12 mg/L of functional scFv (74). However, quite recently scFv were produced successfully in Pseudomonas putidas with a yield of 0.5–3.6 mg/L. Interestingly, production yields were decreased by using scFv genes codon optimized for P. putidas (75).

Gram-positive bacteria

Gram-positive bacteria directly secrete proteins into the medium due to the lack of an outer membrane which could facilitate production of antibody fragments. The Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus brevis (76, 77), Bacillus subtilis (78, 79), and Bacillus megaterium (80–85) have already been successfully used for the production of different antibody fragments. In addition, B. megaterium does not produce alkaline proteases and provides high stability of plasmid vectors during growth allowing stable transgene expression during long term cultivation in bioreactors (86). Lactobacilli are also tested for antibody production and are “generally regarded as safe” (GRAS) microorganisms. To date, two lactobacillus strains were used for the production of scFvs, Lactobacillus zeae/casei (87, 88), and Lactobacillus paracasei (35, 89). The GRAS status of lactobacilli allows their direct use for oral application for example for production of anti-Streptococcus mutans antibody fragments to prevent tooth decay (88).

Eukaryotic Hosts Used for Antibody Production

Yeasts

Eukaryotic cells have developed an advanced folding, post-translational, and secretion apparatus which enhances the secretory production of antibodies, including full immunoglobulins compared to bacteria. Yeasts combine the properties of eukaryotic cells short generation time and ease of genetic manipulation with the robustness and simple medium requirements of unicellular microbial hosts. Moreover, yeasts have been used for fermentation in food production for several millennia in human history; they do not produce bacterial endotoxins and have gained the GRAS status paving the way toward production of therapeutic proteins (90, 91). Pichia pastoris represents the major yeast strain used for recombinant antibody production (92). Other yeasts like Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hansenula polymorpha, Schizosaccharomyces pombe (93, 94), Schwanniomyces occidentalis, Kluyveromyces lactis, and Yarrowia lipolytica (95) have also been described for protein production but have played only a minor role. P. pastoris shows overall optimal capacity for the production and secretion of heterologous proteins than S. cerevisiae and does not secrete large amounts of its own protein which simplifies the downstream processing. Moreover, P. pastoris prefers respiratory growth resulting in high-cell densities of more than 100 g/L dry weight (96). Probably the most prominent feature of P. pastoris is the metabolization of methanol as sole carbon source. The alcohol oxidase 1 (AOX1) promoter is strictly controllable by methanol and commonly used for recombinant protein expression. The secretory production of heterologous proteins including antibodies requires an aminoterminal signal sequence targeting the yeast’s secretory pathway. S. cerevisiae mating factor alpha (alpha-factor) pre-pro peptide is the most commonly used secretory signal sequence and is followed by appropriate proteolytic cleavage sites sensitive for the Golgi resident endoprotease KEX2 for efficient release of antibodies during secretion, which is often used in combination with ST13 exoprotease sites (97). Expression of scFv antibody fragments in P. pastoris was first shown by Ridder et al. in 1995 (98). Yields for different scFvs ranged from 70 mg/L (99) to 250 mg/L (100). Up to 8 g/L functional scFv were obtained under optimized conditions in bioreactors with coexpression of BiP (101). Llama VHHs achieved over 100 mg/L yield in S. cerevisiae even in shake flask cultivation (102). Production of more complex, yet still single-gene-encoded formats such as dimeric scFv-Fc antibodies in P. pastoris achieved production levels of 10–30 mg/L (103). Antibody formats encoded by two genes such as Fab and IgG required the fusion of the two different antibody chains to the aminoterminal secretory signal sequence and their cotransformation. The yield of Fabs produced in yeast ranged from 1 to 50 mg/L by shake flask cultivation and up to 0.5 g/L in bioreactors (96). Limited data concerning full-sized IgG expression in yeast is available. In an early study, a mouse-human chimeric antibody and its Fab fragment were produced in S. cerevisiae with a yield of 50–80 μg/L IgG and 200 μg/L Fab, respectively. The chimeric IgG mediated tumor specific binding and ADCC (antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity) but no CDC (complement dependent cytotoxicity) (104). Using P. pastoris up to 1.4 g/L of a human IgG1 could be expressed in a 40-L bioreactor (105). Lower transformation rates compared to E. coli must be considered for antibody library generation rather than for antibody production. Moreover, the frequency of homologous transformation in yeast is higher compared to higher eukaryotes facilitating the process of making stable expression clones. Specific issues of heterologous protein expression in yeast can be circumvented by optimizing gene sequences, for example by avoiding AT-rich stretches which can cause premature transcriptional termination. The productivity of antibody fragments in yeasts was increased by DNA shuffling (106). Inefficient secretion of larger heterologous proteins (>30 kDa), proteolysis of secreted proteins during high-cell density fermentation, and inappropriate glycosylation of human glycoproteins are serious issues which required engineering of yeast strains. Overexpression of the chaperone immunoglobulin binding protein (BiP) or protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) in S. cerevisiae increased scFv secretion titers twofold to eightfold, with an average yield of 20 mg/L in shake flask culture (107). Yeasts tend to hyperglycosylate heterologous proteins even at positions not glycosylated in the native mammalian host, which can influence activity of antibodies and is a potential source of immunogenicity or adverse reactions in human patients. P. pastoris exhibits much lower hyperglycosylation than S. cerevisiae, and its N-linked carbohydrate structures are already similar to the mammalian high-mannose core unit Man5–6GlcNAc2 (108). Moreover, genetically modified glyco-engineered P. pastoris strains have been generated which produce humanized glycosylation patterns (109–113). The therapeutic IgG antibodies produced in glyco-engineered yeast achieved results that were comparable to its counterpart Trastuzumab that has been produced in mammalian cells (114). Unlike IgGs produced in wildtype yeast, those produced in glyco-engineered yeasts were able to mediate antibody-mediated effector functions. Production processes employing glyco-engineered yeasts are currently optimized for commercial antibody production (115) as well as for high throughput screening (116).

Filamentous fungi

Filamentous fungi of the genera Trichoderma and Aspergillus have the capacity to secrete large amounts of proteins and metabolites into the medium (117). They are widely used in the food and biotechnological industry, for example A. niger for citric acid production. Moreover, A. niger (subgenus A. awamori) and Aspergillus oryzae gained obtained GRAS status. Two promoters are typically used for the expression of antibodies in fungi: the glucoamylase promoter (glaA) (118) and the endoxylanase A promoter (exlA) (119). Antibody chains are usually fused to the aminoterminus of glucoamylase in Aspergillus and cellobiohydrolase I in Trichoderma spec., respectively, in order to obtain optimal secretion (120). Moreover, protease cleavage sites like KexB are introduced to release the antibody from glucoamylase before secretion (118). Yields of up to 1.2 g/L IgG were achieved in A. niger when both antibody chains were fused to glycoamylase. In Trichoderma reesei, 150 mg/L of a Fab fragment was obtained when both chains were fused with cellobiohydrolase I increasing yields 100-fold higher than with its natural signal peptide (121). A. awamori was used for the production of several scFvs, llama VHHs and antibody enzyme fusion proteins (117, 119, 122). A yield of 73.8 mg/L of an anti-EGFR-VHH was achieved in A. oryzae by using a Taka-amylase A signal sequence and 28 amino acids from the aminoterminal region of Rhizopus oryzae lipase (123). Fungal proteases can result in protein degradation which was addressed by deletion mutants. Chrysosporium lucknowense C1 contains a triple protease deletion (Delta-alp1, Delta-pep4, Delta-alp2) and was successfully used in small-scale productions for screening as well as in high scale bioreactor productions (124).

Protozoa

Recently, the eukaryotic parasite Leishmania tarentolae has been explored as an expression system for different recombinant proteins (125, 126). One major advantage of this expression system is the mammalian-like glycosylation pattern: this protozoa is able to perform O-glycosylation as well as N-glycosylation, which is highly conserved in mammalians (127). Consequently, L. tarentolae has been begun to be used for the production of recombinant antibodies: analysis of different signal peptides lead to a protein yield of 2–6 mg/L purified scFv (128).

Insect cells

Insect cells represent a very versatile eukaryotic expression system. They can be efficiently transfected with insect-specific viruses from the family of Baculoviridae, particularly the Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcNPV). Baculoviruses are highly species-specific and are considered as safe for humans, mammalians and plants. Infection of human hepatocytes and mammalian cell lines including stable transduction has been demonstrated in cell culture without evidence of viral replication or gene expression under the control of baculoviral promoters (129, 130). Non-essential baculovirus genes involved in the viral life cycle, like Polyhedrin, P10, or Basic can be replaced by heterologous genes. The flexible viral envelop allows packaging of large heterologous gene sequences of more than 20 kb. Heterologous genes under the control of the strong polyhedron promoter are expressed at levels ranging from 0.1 to 50% of the total insect cell protein. Baculoviral protein expression is normally performed in insect cell lines like Sf-9 and Sf-21 of Spodoptera frugiperda, DS2 cells of Drosophila melanogaster, or High Five cells (BTI-TN-5B1-4) of Trichopulsia ni. High Five cells have certain advantages over Sf-9 cells for recombinant protein expression because they secrete up to 25-fold higher protein levels (131), have a more rapid doubling time, allow quick adaptation to serum-free medium and grow in suspension culture. In contrast, Sf-9 and Sf-21 cells are recommended for producing high-titer viral stocks due to higher transfection efficiency. Recombinant protein production can be performed in small-scale using plates or shake flasks as well as in large scale using Spinner flasks or bioreactors. Important parameters for optimizing baculoviral protein production are multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.), production length (usually up to 96 h), addition of protease inhibitors due to the release of viral proteases, temperature (usually 25–30°C), and media pH (pH 6.0–6.4). Secreted monomeric anti-phOx scFv were obtained at levels of up to 32 mg/L in a 6-L bioreactor with 109 cells per liter after 72 h with an m.o.i. of 1 (132). Production yields of 6–18 mg/L have been achieved for various IgGs (133). Immunoglobulins produced in High Five cells showed mammalian-like terminal galactosyl residues β(1,4)-linked to the biantennary GlcNAc residues. In contrast, the absence of sialylation, the formation of paucimannosidic structures and the presence of potentially allergenic α(1,3)-fucose linkages are different to mammalian glycosylation (134). Nevertheless, IgGs produced in insect cells were able to mediate effector functions like complement binding (135, 136) and ADCC (137). Insect cell protein expression was improved using protease deficient baculovirus strains or cell lines with additional glycosyltransferase gene modifications to obtain glycosylation patterns comparable to mammalian cell lines (138–141). Expression of IgGs in insect cells under control of the strong Polyhedron promoter resulted in an extensive aggregation, probably caused by overloading the cellular folding and post-translational processing apparatus (142). Overexpression of the ER resident chaperone binding protein (BiP) significantly enhanced levels of soluble and secreted IgGs in T. ni cells (143). Enhanced secretion of IgGs was also achieved by coexpression of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) or the human cytosolic chaperone hsp70 in T. ni cells (138). Due to strong usage of the cellular metabolism during baculoviral protein expression a high diversity in the post-translational modification was observed. Alternatively to baculoviral expression, insect cells can also be transfected with expression plasmids in a transient or stable manner. Here, usually Schneider 2 (S2) cells of D. melanogaster are used. Secretory production requires a signal sequence like the honeybee melittin leader. Stable transfection of Drosophila cell lines with monomeric and dimeric antibody fragments resulted in yields of up to 25 μg/mL (144). Immunoglobulin G production using the baculovirus expression system demonstrated IgG effector function such as complement binding (135, 136). 10 μg/mL of anti-Rhesus D antibody produced in Sf-9 cells mediated lysis of Rh+ red blood cells by ADCC (137).

Mammalian cells

Today, 60–70% of all recombinant protein pharmaceuticals and 95% of the currently approved therapeutic antibodies are still produced in mammalian cell lines despite relatively high production costs and difficult in handling. However, the advanced mammalian folding, secretion and post-translational apparatus is capable of producing antibodies indistinguishable from those in the human body with least concerns for immunogenic modifications. Moreover, it is also highly efficient for secretion of large and complex IgGs and in combination with the folding and post-translational control it results in high product quality which reduces efforts and costs in the subsequent and more expensive downstream processing steps. The risks of contamination by pathogens or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (TSE/BSE) agents have been eliminated by well-documented Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliant designer cell substrates and chemical defined media without the need of supplementing animal serum components (145). In 2004, mammalian cell culture technology reached production levels of approximately 5 g/L IgGs in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (146). Today, industrial IgG production levels often exceed 12 g/L as the result of a steadily ongoing progress in mammalian cell culture technology, which is mainly due to improved high producer cell lines, optimized production media, and prolonged production processes at high-cell densities. The highest reported IgG production titer we found was obtained in the human embryonic retinal cell line Per.C6 [Crucell, Leiden, Netherlands, (147)] with 27 g/L. Generally, the productivity of recombinant mammalian cell lines increased from initially 10 pg antibody per cell per day (pcd) in 1986 to about 90 pcd in 2004. Today, the antibody production levels only rarely exceed 100 pcd because higher cellular productivity usually corresponds to lower maximum cell densities in the production process. Producer cell lines have also been genetically engineered regarding product homogeneity, improved metabolism, reduced apoptosis, and inducible cell cycle arrest (148, 149) which allows prolonged production times for almost 3 weeks at high-cell viability and cell densities. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are the most common cells applied in the commercial production of biopharmaceuticals. This cell line isolated in the 1950s gave rise to a range of genetically different progeny, such as K1-, DukX B11-, DG44-cell lines and others which differ in protein product quality and achievable yield. In addition, Per.C6 cells, mouse myeloma NS0 cells, baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells and the human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293 received regulatory approval for recombinant protein production. Although glycosylation patterns of mammalian glycoproteins are very similar to that in humans (150), even small differences can influence pharmacokinetics and effector functions of antibodies. Alternative designer cell lines with improved glycosylation patterns have been generated, for example human neuronal precursor cell line AGE1.HN (Probiogen, Berlin, Germany) supporting specific and complex glycostructures for the production of antibodies which require specific post-translational modifications or suffer from instability or susceptibility for proteolysis (151). CHO cell variant Lec13 (Glycotope) also produces human IgG1 with N-Linked glycans lacking fucose which improves on Fc-gammaRIII binding and ADCC (152).

Stable production of antibodies in mammalian cells

The generation of stable master cell lines is a prerequisite for GMP compliant IgG production in the therapeutic sector in order to guarantee long term production stability. Here, the antibody gene expression cassettes have to be stably integrated into the host cell genome. Strong promoters like the immediate early cytomegalovirus (CMV) or the cellular elongation factor (EF) 1-alpha promoter and polyadenylation sites from the simian virus (SV) 40 or the bovine growth hormone (BGH) for improved mRNA stability and translation efficiency are usually implemented into the expression vector. Furthermore, splicing of mRNA is known to promote mRNA packaging and transfer into the cytosol in order to stabilize and enhance gene expression as well as to reduce silencing of heterologous transgenes (153, 154). For IgG expression, two different genes must be stably transfected into one cell clone, either by cotransfection or by using bicistronic expression vectors. Bicistronic vectors employing internal ribosomal entry sites (IRES) allow the translation of two or more cistrons from the same transcript (155). The encephalomyelitis virus (ECMV) IRES has shown the highest efficiency in various mammalian cell lines. Mutated IRES derivatives allow the control of translation efficiency in relation to the cap-dependent cistron. The ratio between light and heavy chain has great impact on the secretion level of functional IgGs (156). The long term stability of ECMV IRES containing bicistronic constructs has been demonstrated even in the absence of selection pressure over months (157). There are different methods to enhance antibody expression by increasing the number of antibody gene copies in the genome through gene amplification. The two major systems on the market are based on dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) or glutamyl synthetase (GS) selection. Yield and functionality of an IgG1 produced in dhfrCHO and GS-NSO are equivalent (158) and reached 1.8 g/L in GS-NS0 cells (159). However, gene amplification also causes genetic instability, and after removing the selection pressure the yield of antibodies can be reduced again. Moreover, high producer cell lines often contain only a few copies of the antibody genes. For example, up to 2.7 g/L final antibody concentration were obtained from NS0 cells containing three vector copies per cell (160). Other factors than the number of gene copies play an important role to achieve high production levels of antibodies. Therefore, industrial antibody expression platforms employ efficient screening systems in order to isolate the best of the high producers. However, there are also strategies to facilitate the isolation of high producer clones (161). To overcome negative effects of the integration site, protective cis-regulatory elements include insulators, boundary elements, scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MARs) (162), chromatin opening elements (163), and antirepressor elements (164) were introduced into the vector which reduced the influence of heterochromatin and stabilize transgene expression (165, 166). Silencing can be blocked by inhibition of histone deacetylation using butyrate (167) which could enhance the protein expression levels of the cells (168) but can also induce apoptosis. Recombination enzymes, like bacteriophage P1 Cre recombinase, lambda phage integrase, or yeast Flp recombinase can efficiently catalyze the site specific integration into defined chromosomal recombination exchange cassettes which have been introduced into producer cell lines (169, 170). The 2A/furin technology allows expression of both IgG chains as a single gene due to post-translational auto-cleavage of the viral protease 2A encoded by the linker and subsequent processing by the Golgi protease furin (171, 172).

Transient production of antibodies in mammalian cells

The generation of high producer cell lines has been dramatically improved and accelerated (161, 173), however it is still too expensive, time-consuming and laborious for research applications, or if large numbers of individual antibodies have to be produced. Here, transient and semi-stable mammalian antibody expression is much more suitable because it allows fast and parallelized production without any need to generate producer cell lines (174). Moreover, transient mammalian antibody production can be scaled up by employing batch or fed-batch bioreactor processes to more than 150 L production volumes (175). Therefore, transient antibody production is suitable for small-scale production in antibody screening (176), but also capable to generate grams of antibodies (177–179). The human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cell lines have been widely used for transient protein expression because they can be very efficiently transfected with plasmid DNA. Some derivatives were further transformed either with the simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen, termed HEK293T, or with the Epstein Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1), termed HEK293E, in order to mediate semi-stable episomal propagation of vectors containing an origin of replication (ori) of SV40 or EBV, respectively. Transient transfection of plasmid DNA in HEK293 cells can also be performed in large scale by calcium phosphate transfection (180), cationic liposomes, and polymers like polyethyleneimine (PEI) (181, 182). Recently, transient production of IgG-like scFv-Fc antibodies in the HEK293-6E cell line, a genetically modified variant with a truncated version of EBNA1 growing in suspension and chemically defined serum-free medium (183, 184), achieved volumetric yields of up to 0.6 g/L by simple shake flask cultivation. Improved production media, fed-batch supplementation, and well-controlled bioreactor processes allow higher cell densities and prolonged production time, both enhancing the yield. Backliwal and colleagues (177) combined optimized PEI-based transfection at high-cell densities with the coexpression of cell cycle regulators p18 and p21, acidic fibroblast growth factor, valproic acid supplementation, consequent maintenance at high-cell densities of cells/milliliter and up-scaling to 2 L and achieved production levels of more than 1 g IgG within 2 weeks after transient transfection.

Transgenic Organisms

Transgenic plants

The development of transgenic plants for the expression of recombinant antibodies is becoming interesting, especially when high amounts are required. Up-scaling of this production system can be achieved more easily compared to other systems such as mammalian cell culture, where up-scaling of the fermentation process leads to increasing production costs. In theory, the costs of an IgA expressed in plants are only 1–10% compared to the expression in hybridoma cells (185). The generation of genetically modified dicotyledonous plants is mainly done by the transfer of the expression cassette of the transgene with the help of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In principle, the gene of interest is cloned into the T-DNA of a binary plasmid (186, 187) which is flanked by two 25 bp imperfect repeats. In most cases, the expression of the transgene is under the control of one or two (188) copies of the constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV). In addition, a selection marker is located on the T-DNA and transferred into the host genome for effective screening of successfully transformed plants. After integration of the T-DNA into the host genome by non-homologous recombination complete plants can be regenerated from transformed pieces of the plant [RB (189)]. As this procedure requires several months of transformation and special regeneration protocols, transient expression systems have been developed which allow time saving production of recombinant proteins: McCormick and colleagues designed a tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) based vector for the secretory expression of different scFvs for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (190). Expression yields in Nicotiana benthamiana were up to 100–800 μg/mL in the crude secretory extract. Same technique has been applied for the expression of idiotype-scFvs for personalized vaccination of follicular B-cell lymphoma patients in a phase I clinical study (191). In this study, nearly half of the treated patients developed an antigen specific immune response despite differences in glycosylation pattern. Differences in the glycosylation pattern between mammalia and plants are one of the main obstacles researchers have to overcome when developing therapeutic antibodies expressed in plants. Although plants are able to perform complex glycosylation, differences in glycosylation patterns, in particular β1,2-xylose and α1,3-fucose, can lead to immunogenicity of the therapeutic proteins (192–194). Therefore, different strategies have been developed to express recombinant proteins with a more mammalian-like glycosylation pattern. The first one is the retention of the protein in the endoplasmic reticulum (eR) as eR-associated N-glycosylation leads to the generation of oligomannose-type N-glycans which are identical in plants and mammalians (192, 195). One side effect of this localization is the accumulation to higher levels in the eR (196, 197). A second approach for the expression of proteins with mammalian-like glycosylation patterns is the usage of glyco-engineered plants. In most cases, RNA interference (RNAi) is used for the down-regulation of endogenous beta1,2-xylosyltransferase and alpha1,3-fucosyltransferase leading to a reduction of the xylosylated and core-fucosylated N-glycans (198–200). A second type of glyco-engineering in plants is the coexpression of genes which facilitates the expression of human-like N-glycans (201) or even the in planta protein sialylation by the coexpression of six mammalian genes (202). An increasing effort has been put into the adaptation of N-glycosylation, but there are also some efforts in the engineering of sialylated mucin-type O-glycans to achieve the most human-like glycosylation patterns (203, 204). Alternatively, non-glycosylated antibodies which mediate protection against an inhalation anthrax spore challenge in non-human primates showed an improvement of the half-life in serum (205). Rodriguez and colleagues showed that the aglycosylated form of Nimotuzumab (currently in a phase II clinical study in the USA and Canada) produced in tobacco shares the in vitro and in vivo properties as well as the antitumor effect in nude mice with the glycosylated form (206). Transient expression of an antibody in plants can be achieved using viral vectors. The main problem with this approach is the low infectivity with these vectors. Therefore, the more efficient transfer of A. tumefaciens was combined with the speed and high expression rate of plant RNA viruses (207). This system has been used for the expression of monoclonal antibodies in Nicotiana benthamiana with yields up to 0.5 g/kg fresh weight (208). In principle, most plantibodies are expressed in tobacco (N. tabacum or N. benthamiana), but there are also production systems in Lemna minor (duckweed) (209–211), rice cell culture (212), Arabidopsis thaliana seeds (213, 214), Medicago sativa (alfalfa) (215), lettuce (216), and maize (217). HIV-1 neutralizing antibody 2G12 was expressed in the endosperm of maize and showed similar or even better neutralizing properties as its CHO-derived counterpart (218). Besides the transfection or transformation of whole plants or at least organs, monoclonal BY-2 tobacco cell lines that grow in suspension have been developed (219). Flow cytometric analysis has been used to enrich cells expressing a fluorescent marker which was located on the same T-DNA with the antibody gene. Using this method for the enrichment of high expressing cells, production could be increased up to 13-fold and was shown to be stable for 10–12 months. Much effort has been set into the establishment and development of plants producing antibodies for therapy, but so far none of these products has appeared on the market, despite of the estimated dramatic reduction of production costs (220). Nevertheless, at least two plant derived antibodies have been used in clinical trials: CaroRX was developed by Planet Biotechnology (Hayward, CA, USA) and is expressed in transgenic tobacco (221). This antibody binds to the streptococcal antigen I/II of S. mutans, the major causative agent of bacterial tooth decay and prevents the attachment of S. mutans to tooth enamel. CaroRX has entered clinical phase II (222, 223). A second plant-made anti-idiotype antibody against non-Hodgkin-lymphoma (NHL) which was successfully tested in clinical phase I study has been mentioned above (191, 224).

Transgenic animals

In recent years the idea of expressing human antibodies in transgenic animals has increased. On the one hand the humanization of antibodies for therapeutics derived from hybridoma technology is still a laborious and time-consuming procedure which often requires the generation and characterization of a set of different humanized versions of the antibody. On the other hand the mouse or rat derived antibodies may elicit an immune response in patients (225, 226). One method for the generation of fully human binders is the antibody phage display technology (21). Beside this, several researchers developed transgenic animals for the production and expression of human monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies: therefore, human antibodies have mostly been expressed in the milk of transgenic mice (227–230), goats (231), or even in eggs of transgenic chickens (232). The first step toward the generation of human antibodies in animals by immunization was the transfer of a human minilocus containing unrearranged immunoglobulin variable, diversity, and joining elements linked to a human μ-chain into mice (233). In this study, approximately 4% of the extracted B-lymphocytes expressed human antibodies. The immunization of larger animals containing human chromosomal immunoglobulin loci would enable the production of even larger amounts of antibodies. Therefore, transgenic cattle were developed by the transfer of a human artificial chromosome vector containing the entire unrearranged sequences of the human immunoglobulin heavy and lambda light chain loci (234). For the improvement of the human antibody proportion and for safety reasons regarding the potential risk of BSE, the bovine immunoglobulin μ heavy chain locus and the bovine prion protein have been knocked out (235, 236). Finally, transgenic cattle carrying human immunoglobulin heavy and kappa-light chain loci have been used for immunization with anthrax protective antigen. The resulting polyclonal antibody mixture consisted of entirely human and chimeric immunoglobulins that showed high activity and were protective in an in vivo mouse challenge models (237). Rabbits and cattle were used for expression of a bispecific scFv targeting the melanoma-associated proteoglycan and the human CD28 molecule on T cells (238). The usage of different animals as a source for the generation of human polyclonal sera has already been initiated: the immunoglobulin gene loci have been knocked out in livestock such as pigs or rabbits (239–241). For a review of approaches for the generation of transgenic animals expressing polyclonal human antibodies see Houdebine (242). Much of the energy in transgenic production has been set on the development of humanized mice or rats. The well established property of generating hybridoma cells from these species facilitates a streamlined approach for the generation of a cell line which stably expresses monoclonal antibodies (17, 243, 244). Using humanized mice, an anti-HIV-1 gp140 antibody was identified, but in contrast the low number of antigen specific hybridomas occurring during the generation of the clones has been observed (245). Therefore, the usage of humanized rats has been suggested to circumvent these problems and first antibodies have been developed with sub-nanomolar affinities using the so called OmniRat (246).

Concluding Remarks

Today, mammalian cell lines represent the most widely used expression system for the production of recombinant antibodies. Several other hosts are being developed which are even able to produce antibodies with human-like glycosylation patterns. In addition to this, there are several applications where the glycosylation pattern does not play a critical role, such as for in vitro diagnostics or in research. Therefore, bacteria, yeasts, filamentous fungi, and insect cells can be employed in order to lower the production costs of these products. In principle, transgenic plants and animals have the highest potential for up-scaling processes to theoretically unlimited production amounts. An overview of recombinant antibodies produced in different hosts is shown in Table 1. There, however, it must be discriminated between the yield of functional antibodies after purification and the total yield.
Table 1

Production of recombinant antibodies by host.

HostAntigenAntibody format (clone)Production systemYieldReference
GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA
Escherichia coliDigoxinFab (26–10)Shake flask0.8 mg/L/OD600Levy et al. (49)
Escherichia coliCD18F (ab′)2Fermentor2.5 g/LChen et al. (247 )
Escherichia coliLysozymescFv (D1.3)250/400 mL shake flask0.3–1.0 mg/LJordan et al. (84), Monsellier and Bedouelle (248), Thie et al. (70)
Escherichia coliCRPscFv (LA13-IIE3)300 mL shake flask0.55 mg/LJordan et al. (83)
Escherichia coliLysozymescFab (D1.3)300 mL shake flask9.5 μg/L
Escherichia coliMUC1VHH100 L shake flask10 mg/LRahbarizadeh et al. (249)
Escherichia coliClostridium difficile toxin AVHH (14 different)Shake flask?1.2–72.3 mg/LHussack et al. (250)
Escherichia coliMUC1scFv (2 different)250 mL shake flask0.46/1.3 mg/LThie et al. (70)
Escherichia colip815HER2Fab10 L fermenter1–2 g/LCarter et al. (251 )
Escherichia coliAtrazineFab (K411B)2 L fermenter13.8 mg/LWiebe et al. (66)
Escherichia coliPPLVL dAb1.5 L fermenter35–65 mg/LCossins et al. (252)
Escherichia coliphOxscFv50 mL shake flask16.2 mg/LKipriyanov et al. (69)
Escherichia coliphOxscFv3 L fermenter1.2 g/LSletta et al. (68)
Escherichia coliScorpion toxin Cn2scFv; Fab (BCF2)n. d.0.3 mg/L; 1.0 mg/LQuintero-Hernández et al. (253)
Escherichia coliTNF alphascFvShake flask?45 mg/LYang et al. (254)
Escherichia coliHSP70Fab (cmHsp70.1)8 L fermenter>15 mg/LFriedrich et al. (64 )
Escherichia coliTissue factorIgG10 L fermenter130–150 mg/LSimmons et al. (73)
Escherichia coliTAG-72Fv (B72.3)Shake flask; fermentor40 mg/L; 450 mg/LKing et al. (255)
Escherichia coliVEGFscFv::SUMO50 mL shake flask?50.3 mg/LYe et al. (256)
Escherichia coliHIV capsidFab, engineeredShake flask12 mg/LNadkarni et al. (257)
Escherichia coliOvarian carcinoma/CD3scFv–scFv250 mL shake flask1.2 g/LZhao et al. (71)
Escherichia coliFibroblast growth factor receptor FGFR1VHHShake flask10–15 mg/LVeggiani and de Marco (50)
Escherichia coliHuman prionscFvShake flask35 mg/LPadiolleau-Lefevre et al. (258)
Escherichia coliLysozymescFv (D1.3)LEX bioreactor (1.5 L)∼2 mg/LMiethe et al. (67 )
Escherichia coliMUC1scFv (HT186-D11)LEX bioreactor (1.5 L)∼40 mg/L
Escherichia coliCD30scFv (SH313-B5)LEX bioreactor (1.5 L)∼38 mg/L
Escherichia coliCrf2scFv (MS112-IIB1)LEX bioreactor (1.5 L)∼4.5 mg/L
Escherichia coliTubulinscFv (different ones)Shake flask (intracellular)up to 50 mg/LPhilibert et al. (259)
Escherichia colin. d.Fab20 L; 75 L fed-batch bioreactor0.7 g/L; 0.5 g/LNesbeth et al. (260)
Proteus mirabilisFAPscFv (OS4)50 mL shake flask∼12 mg/LRippmann et al. (74 )
Proteus mirabilisPhosphorylcholinescFv-dHLXn. d.10–18 mg/LKujau et al. (30)
Pseudomonas putidasLysozymescFv (D1.3)200 mL shake flask1.5 mg/LDammeyer et al. (75)
Pseudomonas putidasMUC1scFv (HT186-D11)200 mL shake flask3.6 mg/L
Pseudomonas putidasCRPscFv (TOB5-D4)200 mL shake flask2.9 mg/L
GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA
Bacillus brevisuPAFab2 L shake flask100 mg/LInoue et al. (76)
Bacillus megateriumLysozymescFv (D1.3)400 mL shake flask0.41 mg/LJordan et al. (84)
Bacillus megateriumCRPscFv (LA13-IIE3)300 mL shake flask0.39 mg/LJordan et al. (83)
Bacillus megateriumLysozymescFab (D1.3)300 mL shake flask3.5 μg/LJordan et al. (83 )
Bacillus subtilisDigoxinscFvn. d.12 mg/LWu et al. (78)
Lactobacillus paracaseiRotavirusVHHn. d.∼1 mg/LPant et al. (35 )
Streptomyces lividansLysozymeFvn. d.∼1 mg/LUeda et al. (261 )
EUKARYOTES
Yeast
Yarrowia lipolytica, Kluyveromyces lactisRasscFvShake flasks10–20 mg/LSwennen et al. (262)
Pichia pastorisMuc1VHHBaffled flasks10–15 mg/LRahbarizadeh et al. (263)
Pichia pastorisTNFαVHH-FcShake flasks5 mg/LJi et al. (264 )
Pichia pastorisAaHIVHHShake flasks17 mg/LEzzine et al. (265)
Pichia pastorisB-type natriuretic peptidescFvShake flasks150 mg/LMaeng et al. (266)
Pichia pastorisAtrazineFab-HRPShake flasks3–10 mg/LKoliasnikov et al. (267)
Pichia pastorisMuc1Bibody, tribodyShake flasks12–36 mg/LSchoonooghe et al. (268)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae71 DifferentVHHShake flasks<1 to>100 mg/LGorlani et al. (269, 270)
Pichia pastorisHER2scFvShake flasks15–20 mg/LSommaruga et al. (271)
Pichia pastorisn. d.scFvn. d.300 mg/LKhatri et al. (272)
Pichia pastorisKeratin 8sc (Fv)2Baffled shake flasks4–5 mg/LJafari et al. (273)
Pichia pastorisn. d.IgG0.5 L bioreactor0.5–1 g/LBarnard et al. (274)
Pichia pastorisRabies virusscFv-Fc80 L fermenter60 mg/LWang et al. (275)
Pichia pastorisHER2IgG3 L bioreactor148–227 mg/LChen et al. (276)
Filamentous fungi
Aspergillus niger var. awamoriErbB2IgG, FabShake flasks0.9 g/L; 0.2 g/LWard et al. (118)
Aspergillus niger var. awamoriLysozymescFv7 L fermenter108.9 mg/LSotiriadis et al. (277)
Aspergillus oryzaeEGFRVHHShake flasks73.8 mg/LOkazaki et al. (123)
Protozoa
Leishmania tarentolae16 Different scFvscFvShake flasks0.04–3.38 mg/LKlatt and Konthur (128)
Insect cells
Trichoplusia ni larvaeRotavirusVHHLiving larvae257 mg/LGómez-Sebastián et al. (278)
Spodoptera frugiperdaBlood coagulation factor VIIIscFvShake flasks3.2–10 mg/LKurasawa et al. (279)
Drosophila, S2Glycoprotein HFabSpinner flasks16 mg/LBackovic et al. (280)
Drosophila, S2HIVIgGn. d.5–35 mg/LJohansson et al. (281)
Drosophila, S2Bovine viral diarrhea virus, hepatitis C virusscFvn. d.5–12 mg/LGilmartin et al. (282)
Spodoptera frugiperda, SF-9gp41IgGT-flasks3 mg/LPalmberger et al. (283)
Trichoplusia nigp41IgGT-flasks12 mg/LPalmberger et al. (283)
Sf SWT-1 Mimicgp41IgGT-flasks3 mg/LPalmberger et al. (283)
MAMMALIAN CELLS
Transient
HEK293TCD200, SIRPγFabGenejuice, roller bottles4 mg/LNettleship et al. (284 )
HEK293Tn. d.IgGHEKfectin, tissue culture plates1–14 mg/LLi et al. (155)
CHOn. d.IgG1, IgG4Lipofectamine140 mg/LCodamo et al. (285)
HEK293Fn. d.IgG293fectin100–400 mg/LVan Berkel et al. (286)
CHO DG44RhDIgGPEI, square-shaped bottles90 mg/LWulhfard et al. (287)
HEK293En. d.IgGPEI, square-shaped bottles200 mg/LBackliwal et al. (288)
CHOn. d.IgGPEI, square-shaped bottles60–80 mg/LWulhfard et al. (289)
HEK293ERhDIgGPEI, square-shaped bottles1.1 g/LBackliwal et al. (177)
Stable
CHO-K1n. d.IgGLipofectamine0.05–0.45 mg/LLi et al. (155)
CHOHIV-1scFv-FcPEI5.78–45.49 mg/LMader et al. (290)
CHOn. d.IgGElectroporation4 g/LKober et al. (291)
NS0n. d.IgG5 L bioreactor, fed-batch800 mg/LSpens and Häggström (292)
NS0n. d.IgG2–100 L bioreactor2.64 g/LBurky et al. (293)
per.C6n. d.IgGHollow fiber bioreactor1 g/LJones et al. (147)
per.C6n. d.IgGRoller bottle culture50–100 mg/LJones et al. (147)
per.C6n. d.IgMShake flasks0.5–2 g/LTchoudakova et al. (294)
CHOn. d.VHH-FcShake flasks100 mg/LAgrawal et al. (295)
CHOHER2IgGOrbital shaking bioreactor152 mg/LHuang et al. (296)
Transgenic plants
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiCD22Immunotoxin, exotoxin AParticle bombardement0.2–0.4% of chloroplastsTran et al. (297)
Nicotiana tabacumBoNT/AscFvAgrobacterium tumefaciens20–40 mg/kgAlmquist et al. (298)
Nicotiana benthamianaHIVIgGCPMV105.1 mg/kgSainsbury et al. (299)
Nicotiana tabacumHCCscFv-RNaseAgrobacterium tumefaciens0.75–1.99 μg/gCui et al. (300 )
Nicotiana benthamianaEbola virus GP1IgGAgrobacterium tumefaciens0.4–0.5 mg/gHuang et al. (301)
Transgenic animals
MouseHBVIgGMilk17.8 mg/mLZhang et al. (302)
MouseCD147Chimeric IgGMilk1.1–7.4 mg/mLWei et al. (303)
MouseHepatitis A virusIgGMilk32 mg/mLZhang et al. (304)
MouseHER2scFv-FcMilk∼120 ng/mLYuskevich et al. (305 )
ChickenCD2, prion peptideChimeric IgGEgg white<150 μg/mLKamihira et al. (306)

AaHI, toxin class I of Androctonus australis hector scorpion venom; BoNT/A, Bolutinum toxin serotype A; CPMV, cowpea mosaic virus; FAP, fibroblast activation protein alpha; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; phOx, 2-phenyl-oxazoline-5on; PEI, polyethyleneimine; PPL, peptostreptococcal protein L; RhD, rhesus factor D; uPA, urokinase type plasminogen activator.

Production of recombinant antibodies by host. AaHI, toxin class I of Androctonus australis hector scorpion venom; BoNT/A, Bolutinum toxin serotype A; CPMV, cowpea mosaic virus; FAP, fibroblast activation protein alpha; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; phOx, 2-phenyl-oxazoline-5on; PEI, polyethyleneimine; PPL, peptostreptococcal protein L; RhD, rhesus factor D; uPA, urokinase type plasminogen activator. Antibody phage display is now a widespread method for the development of antibody fragments such as scFv or Fab. The expression host used in this technology is E. coli which is known to be the best genetically examined organism providing a large set of molecular biological tools for genetical engineering. Consequently, both antibody generation and production can be performed without changing the production system. Using high-cell density fermentation, the yield can be up to 1–2 g/L depending on the individual antibody fragment. Antibody fragments expressed in E. coli are mainly secreted into the periplasm and have to be extracted from there. Gram-positive bacteria lack the outer membrane and are well suited for biotechnological processes due to their powerful secretion apparatus which allow easy purification directly from the cultivation supernatant. However, antibody production systems employing Gram-positive bacteria are still in the developmental stage. However, larger antibody formats are very difficult to express in bacteria, if they can be expressed at all. Furthermore, the lack of a glycosylation apparatus limits their use, if effector functions are needed. Yeasts, as an eukaryotic organism, has the capacity to perform post-translational modifications. In addition, they can be used even in high throughput processes and glyco-engineering enables the expression of recombinant proteins with human-like glycosylation. Nevertheless, the production of full-size immunoglobulins remains a challenge. Compared to yeasts, filamentous fungi are more difficult for the generation of transformed clones, but they have a long tradition for the usage in biotechnology and they have partially been used for the expression of IgGs. In contrast, the development of protozoa as an expression system for recombinant proteins and antibodies has just been started and is still in a developmental stage. However, the mammalian-like glycosylation pattern presents them a promising candidate for further exploitation. Insect cells contain a better suited protein folding and secretion apparatus than prokaryotes. Their high robustness combined with less sophisticated requirements for fermentation provide some advantages compared to mammalian cells. However, the development of stable insect cell lines and process technology is not developed as far. Consequently, mammalian cell lines are most widely used for the production of therapeutic antibodies as they provide a sophisticated folding and secretion apparatus as well as human-like glycosylation. For the production of high levels of recombinant antibodies high technical efforts are needed leading to relatively high costs. The maximum reported yield of functional IgG was 5 g/L which cannot be achieved using other expression systems so far, but up-scaling of the production does not lead to a high reduction of the production costs. For an efficient reduction of production costs, transgenic plants can be used as they represent a highly scalable expression system; cultivation can be easily expanded without a gross increase in costs. In contrast, the generation of transgenic plants remains very complex and difficult. The most important obstacle of transgenic plants is the downstream processing as tons of plant material may have to be processed. However, antibody production in milk or eggs of animals would also be highly scalable and permits easy downstream processing. Several livestock animal species have been developed for the expression of recombinant proteins, but generation of transgenic animals also is very laborious. An interesting approach is the combination of human transgenic animals with hybridoma technology for the development of human antibodies. In principle, there is no “universal” production system which can guarantee high yields of recombinant antibody, particularly as every antibody-based molecule itself will cause its own issues in terms of expression.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  295 in total

1.  Expression of an anti-botulinum toxin A neutralizing single-chain Fv recombinant antibody in transgenic tobacco.

Authors:  Kurt C Almquist; Michael D McLean; Yongqing Niu; Greg Byrne; Fernando C Olea-Popelka; Coral Murrant; Jack Barclay; J Christopher Hall
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Recombinant protein production by large-scale transient gene expression in mammalian cells: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Lucia Baldi; David L Hacker; Myriam Adam; Florian M Wurm
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Multimerization domains for antibody phage display and antibody production.

Authors:  H Thie; S Binius; T Schirrmann; M Hust; S Dübel
Journal:  N Biotechnol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.079

Review 4.  New protein engineering approaches to multivalent and bispecific antibody fragments.

Authors:  A Plückthun; P Pack
Journal:  Immunotechnology       Date:  1997-06

5.  Antitransferrin receptor antibody-RNase fusion protein expressed in the mammary gland of transgenic mice.

Authors:  D L Newton; D Pollock; P DiTullio; Y Echelard; M Harvey; B Wilburn; J Williams; H R Hoogenboom; J C Raus; H M Meade; S M Rybak
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1999-12-10       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Differential N-glycan patterns of secreted and intracellular IgG produced in Trichoplusia ni cells.

Authors:  T A Hsu; N Takahashi; Y Tsukamoto; K Kato; I Shimada; K Masuda; E M Whiteley; J Q Fan; Y C Lee; M J Betenbaugh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A comparative study of different vector designs for the mammalian expression of recombinant IgG antibodies.

Authors:  Jiandong Li; Christian Menzel; Doris Meier; Congcong Zhang; Stefan Dübel; Thomas Jostock
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Production of chimeric monoclonal antibodies by genetically manipulated chickens.

Authors:  Masamichi Kamihira; Yoshinori Kawabe; Takuya Shindo; Ken-ichiro Ono; Kazuhisa Esaka; Takashi Yamashita; Ken-ichi Nishijima; Shinji Iijima
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  The production of antibody fragments and antibody fusion proteins by yeasts and filamentous fungi.

Authors:  Vivi Joosten; Christien Lokman; Cees AMJJ Van Den Hondel; Peter J Punt
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 5.328

Review 10.  Medical molecular farming: production of antibodies, biopharmaceuticals and edible vaccines in plants.

Authors:  H Daniell; S J Streatfield; K Wycoff
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 18.313

View more
  86 in total

1.  Production of 3-Oxo-2-(2'-pentenyl)-cyclopentane-1-octanoic Acid in the Fungus Aspergillus oryzae: A Step Towards Heterologous Production of Pyrethrins in Fungi.

Authors:  Maged E Mohamed; Khomaizon A K Pahirulzaman; Colin M Lazarus
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Considerations for the Design of Antibody-Based Therapeutics.

Authors:  Dennis R Goulet; William M Atkins
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Identification of Nanobodies Blocking Intimate Adherence of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli to Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  David Ruano-Gallego; Luis Ángel Fernández
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Exploration of broadly neutralizing antibody fragments produced in bacteria for the control of HIV.

Authors:  Sarah B Lloyd; Keith P Niven; Ben R Kiefel; David C Montefiori; Arnold Reynaldi; Miles P Davenport; Stephen J Kent; Wendy R Winnall
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Structural Analysis of Recent Allergen-Antibody Complexes and Future Directions.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Mueller; Jungki Min; Alexander C Y Foo; Anna Pomés; Lars C Pedersen
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  The M4 insulator, the TM2 matrix attachment region, and the double copy of the heavy chain gene contribute to the enhanced accumulation of the PHB-01 antibody in tobacco plants.

Authors:  Yoslaine Ruiz; Pedro Luis Ramos; Jeny Soto; Meilyn Rodríguez; Natacha Carlos; Aneisi Reyes; Danay Callard; Yadira Sánchez; Merardo Pujol; Alejandro Fuentes
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Comprehensive study of domain rearrangements of single-chain bispecific antibodies to determine the best combination of configurations and microbial host cells.

Authors:  Ryutaro Asano; Yuri Kuroki; Sachiko Honma; Mihoko Akabane; Shunsuke Watanabe; Shinzo Mayuzumi; Shuichi Hiyamuta; Izumi Kumagai; Koji Sode
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.857

8.  Identification of high affinity HER2 binding antibodies using CHO Fab surface display.

Authors:  Annalee W Nguyen; Kevin C Le; Jennifer A Maynard
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.650

9.  Development of an antibody cocktail for treatment of Sudan virus infection.

Authors:  Andrew S Herbert; Jeffery W Froude; Ramon A Ortiz; Ana I Kuehne; Danielle E Dorosky; Russell R Bakken; Samantha E Zak; Nicole M Josleyn; Konstantin Musiychuk; R Mark Jones; Brian Green; Stephen J Streatfield; Anna Z Wec; Natasha Bohorova; Ognian Bohorov; Do H Kim; Michael H Pauly; Jesus Velasco; Kevin J Whaley; Spencer W Stonier; Zachary A Bornholdt; Kartik Chandran; Larry Zeitlin; Darryl Sampey; Vidadi Yusibov; John M Dye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Ligand-targeted theranostic nanomedicines against cancer.

Authors:  Virginia J Yao; Sara D'Angelo; Kimberly S Butler; Christophe Theron; Tracey L Smith; Serena Marchiò; Juri G Gelovani; Richard L Sidman; Andrey S Dobroff; C Jeffrey Brinker; Andrew R M Bradbury; Wadih Arap; Renata Pasqualini
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.