Geoffrey A Mueller1, Jungki Min2, Alexander C Y Foo2, Anna Pomés3, Lars C Pedersen2. 1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 111 T.W. Alexander Drive MD-MR-01, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA. Geoffrey.Mueller@nih.gov. 2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 111 T.W. Alexander Drive MD-MR-01, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA. 3. Indoor Biotechnologies, Inc., Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Allergen-antibody complexes are extremely valuable in describing the detailed molecular features of epitopes. This review summarizes insights gained from recently published co-structures and what obstacles impede the acquisition of further data. RECENT FINDINGS: Structural epitope data helped define the epitopes of two anti-Fel d 1 antibodies undergoing phase I clinical trials, providing a greater level of detail than was possible through hydrogen-deuterium exchange protection studies. Separately, a human camelid-like antibody structure with lysozyme described several unique features in a long variable loop that interacted with the active site cleft of Gal d 4. Finally, a co-structure conclusively demonstrated that Phl p 7 could function as a superantigen and that an antibody could simultaneously recognize two epitopes. These remarkable assertions would not have been possible without visualization of the complex. Only three new complexes have appeared in the last few years, suggesting that there are major impediments to traditional production and crystallization. The structural data was extremely valuable in describing epitopes. New techniques like cryo-EM may provide an alternative to crystallography.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Allergen-antibody complexes are extremely valuable in describing the detailed molecular features of epitopes. This review summarizes insights gained from recently published co-structures and what obstacles impede the acquisition of further data. RECENT FINDINGS: Structural epitope data helped define the epitopes of two anti-Fel d 1 antibodies undergoing phase I clinical trials, providing a greater level of detail than was possible through hydrogen-deuterium exchange protection studies. Separately, a human camelid-like antibody structure with lysozyme described several unique features in a long variable loop that interacted with the active site cleft of Gal d 4. Finally, a co-structure conclusively demonstrated that Phl p 7 could function as a superantigen and that an antibody could simultaneously recognize two epitopes. These remarkable assertions would not have been possible without visualization of the complex. Only three new complexes have appeared in the last few years, suggesting that there are major impediments to traditional production and crystallization. The structural data was extremely valuable in describing epitopes. New techniques like cryo-EM may provide an alternative to crystallography.
Authors: Nina K Jain; Susan Barkowski-Clark; Richard Altman; Krista Johnson; Fang Sun; Jonathan Zmuda; Chao Yan Liu; Adriana Kita; Ryan Schulz; Alyssa Neill; Robert Ballinger; Rekha Patel; Jian Liu; Alinafe Mpanda; Brian Huta; Henry Chiou; Walter Voegtli; Tadas Panavas Journal: Protein Expr Purif Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: Alan Merk; Alberto Bartesaghi; Soojay Banerjee; Veronica Falconieri; Prashant Rao; Mindy I Davis; Rajan Pragani; Matthew B Boxer; Lesley A Earl; Jacqueline L S Milne; Sriram Subramaniam Journal: Cell Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Debajyoti Ghosh; Geoffrey A Mueller; Gabriele Schramm; Lori L Edwards; Arnd Petersen; Robert E London; Helmut Haas; Swati Gupta Bhattacharya Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Geoffrey A Mueller; John A Ankney; Jill Glesner; Taruna Khurana; Lori L Edwards; Lars C Pedersen; Lalith Perera; Jay E Slater; Anna Pomés; Robert E London Journal: Mol Immunol Date: 2014-03-22 Impact factor: 4.407
Authors: J M Orengo; A R Radin; V Kamat; A Badithe; L H Ben; B L Bennett; S Zhong; D Birchard; A Limnander; A Rafique; J Bautista; A Kostic; D Newell; X Duan; M C Franklin; W Olson; T Huang; N A Gandhi; L Lipsich; N Stahl; N J Papadopoulos; A J Murphy; G D Yancopoulos Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Martina Di Muzio; Sabrina Wildner; Sara Huber; Michael Hauser; Eva Vejvar; Werner Auzinger; Christof Regl; Josef Laimer; Danila Zennaro; Nicole Wopfer; Christian G Huber; Ronald van Ree; Adriano Mari; Peter Lackner; Fatima Ferreira; Mario Schubert; Gabriele Gadermaier Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jill Glesner; A Brenda Kapingidza; Magdalena Godzwon; Lesa R Offermann; Geoffrey A Mueller; Eugene F DeRose; Paul Wright; Crystal M Richardson; Judith A Woodfolk; Lisa D Vailes; Sabina Wünschmann; Robert E London; Martin D Chapman; Mats Ohlin; Maksymilian Chruszcz; Anna Pomés Journal: J Immunol Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Martina Di Muzio; Sabrina Wildner; Sara Huber; Michael Hauser; Eva Vejvar; Werner Auzinger; Christof Regl; Josef Laimer; Danila Zennaro; Nicole Wopfner; Christian G Huber; Ronald van Ree; Adriano Mari; Peter Lackner; Fatima Ferreira; Mario Schubert; Gabriele Gadermaier Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Maksymilian Chruszcz; Fook Tim Chew; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Barry K Hurlburt; Geoffrey A Mueller; Anna Pomés; Juha Rouvinen; Mayte Villalba; Birgitta M Wöhrl; Heimo Breiteneder Journal: Allergy Date: 2021-05-02 Impact factor: 14.710
Authors: Monica L Fernández-Quintero; Johannes R Loeffler; Franz Waibl; Anna S Kamenik; Florian Hofer; Klaus R Liedl Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2019-12-31 Impact factor: 1.952