OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CT-perfusion (CT-p) can be used to evaluate the effects of chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and whether CT-p and standard therapeutic response assessment (RECIST) data obtained before and after therapy correlate. METHODS: 55 patients with unresectable NSCLC underwent CT-p before the beginning of therapy and 50 of them repeated CT-p 90 days after it. Therapeutic protocol included platinum-based doublets plus bevacizumab for non-squamous carcinoma and platinum-based doublets for squamous carcinoma. RECIST measurements and calculations of blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), time to peak (TTP) and permeability surface (PS) were performed, and baseline and post-treatment measurements were tested for statistically significant differences. Baseline and follow-up perfusion parameters were also compared based on histopathological subclassification (2004 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours) and therapy response assessed by RECIST. RESULTS: Tumour histology was consistent with large cell carcinoma in 14/50 (28%) cases, adenocarcinoma in 22/50 (44%) cases and squamous cell carcinoma in the remaining 14/50 (28%) cases. BF and PS differences for all tumours between baseline and post-therapy measurements were significant (p=0.001); no significant changes were found for BV (p=0.3) and TTP (p=0.1). The highest increase of BV was demonstrated in adenocarcinoma (5.2±34.1%), whereas the highest increase of TTP was shown in large cell carcinoma (6.9±22.4%), and the highest decrease of PS was shown in squamous cell carcinoma (-21.5±18.5%). A significant difference between the three histological subtypes was demonstrated only for BV (p<0.007). On the basis of RECIST criteria, 8 (16%) patients were classified as partial response (PR), 2 (4%) as progressive disease (PD) and the remaining 40 (80%) as stable disease (SD). Among PR, a decrease of both BF (18±9.6%) and BV (12.6±9.2%) were observed; TTP increased in 3 (37.5%) cases, and PS decreased in 6 (75%) cases. SD patients showed an increase of BF, BV, TTP and PS in 6 (15%), 21 (52.5%), 23 (57.5%) and 2 (5%) cases, respectively. PD patients demonstrated an increase of BF (26±0.2%), BV (2.7±0.1%) and TTP (3.1±0.8%) while only PS decreased (23±0.2%). CONCLUSION: CT-p can adequately evaluate therapy-induced alterations in NSCLC, and perfusion parameters correlate with therapy response assessment performed with RECIST criteria. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Evaluating perfusional parameters, CT-p can demonstrate therapy-induced changes in patients with different types of lung cancer and identify response to treatment with excellent agreement to RECIST measurements.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CT-perfusion (CT-p) can be used to evaluate the effects of chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and whether CT-p and standard therapeutic response assessment (RECIST) data obtained before and after therapy correlate. METHODS: 55 patients with unresectable NSCLC underwent CT-p before the beginning of therapy and 50 of them repeated CT-p 90 days after it. Therapeutic protocol included platinum-based doublets plus bevacizumab for non-squamous carcinoma and platinum-based doublets for squamous carcinoma. RECIST measurements and calculations of blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), time to peak (TTP) and permeability surface (PS) were performed, and baseline and post-treatment measurements were tested for statistically significant differences. Baseline and follow-up perfusion parameters were also compared based on histopathological subclassification (2004 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours) and therapy response assessed by RECIST. RESULTS:Tumour histology was consistent with large cell carcinoma in 14/50 (28%) cases, adenocarcinoma in 22/50 (44%) cases and squamous cell carcinoma in the remaining 14/50 (28%) cases. BF and PS differences for all tumours between baseline and post-therapy measurements were significant (p=0.001); no significant changes were found for BV (p=0.3) and TTP (p=0.1). The highest increase of BV was demonstrated in adenocarcinoma (5.2±34.1%), whereas the highest increase of TTP was shown in large cell carcinoma (6.9±22.4%), and the highest decrease of PS was shown in squamous cell carcinoma (-21.5±18.5%). A significant difference between the three histological subtypes was demonstrated only for BV (p<0.007). On the basis of RECIST criteria, 8 (16%) patients were classified as partial response (PR), 2 (4%) as progressive disease (PD) and the remaining 40 (80%) as stable disease (SD). Among PR, a decrease of both BF (18±9.6%) and BV (12.6±9.2%) were observed; TTP increased in 3 (37.5%) cases, and PS decreased in 6 (75%) cases. SDpatients showed an increase of BF, BV, TTP and PS in 6 (15%), 21 (52.5%), 23 (57.5%) and 2 (5%) cases, respectively. PDpatients demonstrated an increase of BF (26±0.2%), BV (2.7±0.1%) and TTP (3.1±0.8%) while only PS decreased (23±0.2%). CONCLUSION:CT-p can adequately evaluate therapy-induced alterations in NSCLC, and perfusion parameters correlate with therapy response assessment performed with RECIST criteria. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Evaluating perfusional parameters, CT-p can demonstrate therapy-induced changes in patients with different types of lung cancer and identify response to treatment with excellent agreement to RECIST measurements.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Enric Carcereny; Radj Gervais; Alain Vergnenegre; Bartomeu Massuti; Enriqueta Felip; Ramon Palmero; Ramon Garcia-Gomez; Cinta Pallares; Jose Miguel Sanchez; Rut Porta; Manuel Cobo; Pilar Garrido; Flavia Longo; Teresa Moran; Amelia Insa; Filippo De Marinis; Romain Corre; Isabel Bover; Alfonso Illiano; Eric Dansin; Javier de Castro; Michele Milella; Noemi Reguart; Giuseppe Altavilla; Ulpiano Jimenez; Mariano Provencio; Miguel Angel Moreno; Josefa Terrasa; Jose Muñoz-Langa; Javier Valdivia; Dolores Isla; Manuel Domine; Olivier Molinier; Julien Mazieres; Nathalie Baize; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Gilles Robinet; Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Vittorio Gebbia; Lioba Ferrera-Delgado; Pierre Bombaron; Reyes Bernabe; Alessandra Bearz; Angel Artal; Enrico Cortesi; Christian Rolfo; Maria Sanchez-Ronco; Ana Drozdowskyj; Cristina Queralt; Itziar de Aguirre; Jose Luis Ramirez; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miguel Angel Molina; Miquel Taron; Luis Paz-Ares Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Quan Sing Ng; Vicky Goh; Ernst Klotz; Heinz Fichte; Michele I Saunders; Peter J Hoskin; Anwar R Padhani Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Vicky Goh; Steve Halligan; Frances Daley; David M Wellsted; Thomas Guenther; Clive I Bartram Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Chunxia Su; Mathias Meyer; Robert Pirker; Wieland Voigt; Jingyun Shi; Lothar Pilz; Rudolf M Huber; Yilong Wu; Jinghong Wang; Yonglan He; Xuan Wang; Jian Zhang; Xiuyi Zhi; Meiqi Shi; Bo Zhu; Stefan S Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler; Christian Manegold; Caicun Zhou; Eric Dominic Roessner Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2016-08
Authors: J de Castro; M Cobo; D Isla; J Puente; N Reguart; B Cabeza; A Gayete; M Sánchez; M I Torres; J Ferreirós Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Martin Lundsgaard Hansen; Eva Fallentin; Carsten Lauridsen; Ian Law; Birgitte Federspiel; Lene Bæksgaard; Lars Bo Svendsen; Michael Bachmann Nielsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Louise S Strauch; Rie Ø Eriksen; Michael Sandgaard; Thomas S Kristensen; Michael B Nielsen; Carsten A Lauridsen Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2016-07-21