Literature DB >> 23908252

Pelvic fractures: part 2. Contemporary indications and techniques for definitive surgical management.

Joshua R Langford1, Andrew R Burgess, Frank A Liporace, George J Haidukewych.   

Abstract

Once the patient with pelvic fracture is resuscitated and stabilized, definitive surgical management and anatomic restoration of the pelvic ring become the goal. Understanding injury pattern by stress examination with the patient under anesthesia helps elucidate the instability. Early fixation of the unstable pelvis is important for mobilization, pain control, and prevention of chronic instability or deformity. Current pelvic fracture management employs a substantial amount of percutaneous reduction and fixation, with less emphasis placed on pelvic reconstruction proceeding from posterior to anterior, and most reduction and fixation of unstable pelvic fractures done with the patient supine. Compared with control subjects with acetabular fracture or pelvic fracture alone, patients with combined injury have a significantly higher Injury Severity Score, lower systolic blood pressure, and higher mortality rates; they are also transfused more packed red blood cells. Even with anatomic restoration of the pelvis, long-term outcomes after severe pelvic trauma are below population norms. The most common chronic problems relate to sexual dysfunction and pain. Regardless of fracture type, neurologic injury is a universal harbinger of poor outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23908252     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-08-458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  9 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of anterior ring fixation of the ramus in type C pelvis fractures.

Authors:  S McLachlin; M Lesieur; D Stephen; H Kreder; C Whyne
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Tranexamic acid use in pelvic and/or acetabular fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry T Shu; Jacob D Mikula; Andrew T Yu; Babar Shafiq
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-12-02

3.  Regional anesthesia does not decrease opioid demand in pelvis and acetabulum fracture surgery.

Authors:  Daniel J Cunningham; J Patton Robinette; Ariana R Paniagua; Micaela A LaRose; Michael Blatter; Mark J Gage
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-09-14

4.  Epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures and injuries.

Authors:  Gilberto José Cação Pereira; Erick Ribeiro Damasceno; Daniel Innocenti Dinhane; Francisco Marques Bueno; Jaqueline Bartelega Rodrigues Leite; Bruno da Costa Ancheschi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-05-19

Review 5.  Vertical shear pelvic injury: evaluation, management, and fixation strategies.

Authors:  Laura Blum; Mark E Hake; Ryan Charles; Todd Conlan; David Rojas; Murphy Trey Martin; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Stability evaluation of anterior external fixation in patient with unstable pelvic ring fracture: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Lan Li; Jingwei Lu; Longfei Yang; Kaijia Zhang; Jing Jin; Guojing Sun; Xingsong Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

Review 7.  Imaging Review of Pelvic Ring Fractures and Its Complications in High-Energy Trauma.

Authors:  Edoardo Leone; Andrea Garipoli; Umberto Ripani; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Marco Spoliti; Domenico Creta; Carolina Giannace; Antonio Galluzzo; Margherita Trinci; Michele Galluzzo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02

8.  The Outcome of Complex Pelvic Fracture after Internal Fixation Surgery.

Authors:  H D Ismail; M F Lubis; Y P Djaja
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2016-03

9.  Comparisons of front plate, percutaneous sacroiliac screws, and sacroiliac anterior papilionaceous plate in fixation of unstable pelvic fractures.

Authors:  Ronghe Gu; Weiguo Huang; Lijing Yang; Huijiang Liu; Kegong Xie; Zonggui Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.