PURPOSE: To evaluate spatiotemporal parallel imaging with R = 5 in comparison to conventional parallel imaging with R = 2 applied to phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This was motivated by the fact that scan times for PC imaging often exceed breath-hold capabilities of patients even with standard parallel imaging using typical reduction factors of R = 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: K-t generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) acquisition was validated in phantom measurements and then applied in 10 volunteer and three patient examinations. Due to the higher reduction factor compared to conventional GRAPPA, k-t GRAPPA measurements could be performed during breath-hold with high spatial and temporal resolution. K-t GRAPPA scans were compared to GRAPPA acquired during free-breathing with navigator respiration control. In addition, spatiotemporally accelerated PC imaging was acquired during free-breathing for comparison of k-t-accelerated breath-held scans. RESULTS: Substantial improvements in image quality for the breath-hold measurements were observed. Significantly reduced peak velocities were found for the GRAPPA protocol compared to the k-t-accelerated breath-hold scans for both flow (8%) and myocardial motion (up to 30%) measurements. CONCLUSION: Spatiotemporal acceleration allows the performance of high temporal or spatial resolution PC imaging during breath-hold while providing high image quality and robust acquisition of functional information that cannot be achieved during breath-hold with standard techniques.
PURPOSE: To evaluate spatiotemporal parallel imaging with R = 5 in comparison to conventional parallel imaging with R = 2 applied to phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This was motivated by the fact that scan times for PC imaging often exceed breath-hold capabilities of patients even with standard parallel imaging using typical reduction factors of R = 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: K-t generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) acquisition was validated in phantom measurements and then applied in 10 volunteer and three patient examinations. Due to the higher reduction factor compared to conventional GRAPPA, k-t GRAPPA measurements could be performed during breath-hold with high spatial and temporal resolution. K-t GRAPPA scans were compared to GRAPPA acquired during free-breathing with navigator respiration control. In addition, spatiotemporally accelerated PC imaging was acquired during free-breathing for comparison of k-t-accelerated breath-held scans. RESULTS: Substantial improvements in image quality for the breath-hold measurements were observed. Significantly reduced peak velocities were found for the GRAPPA protocol compared to the k-t-accelerated breath-hold scans for both flow (8%) and myocardial motion (up to 30%) measurements. CONCLUSION: Spatiotemporal acceleration allows the performance of high temporal or spatial resolution PC imaging during breath-hold while providing high image quality and robust acquisition of functional information that cannot be achieved during breath-hold with standard techniques.
Authors: Alexander Ruh; Roberto Sarnari; Haben Berhane; Kenny Sidoryk; Kai Lin; Ryan Dolan; Arleen Li; Michael J Rose; Joshua D Robinson; James C Carr; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Charlotte Gimpel; Bernd A Jung; Sabine Jung; Johannes Brado; Daniel Schwendinger; Barbara Burkhardt; Martin Pohl; Katja E Odening; Julia Geiger; Raoul Arnold Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2016-12-13
Authors: Michael J Rose; Kelly Jarvis; Varun Chowdhary; Alex J Barker; Bradley D Allen; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby; Susanne Schnell Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: M Markl; S Schnell; C Wu; E Bollache; K Jarvis; A J Barker; J D Robinson; C K Rigsby Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Daming Shen; Ashitha Pathrose; Roberto Sarnari; Allison Blake; Haben Berhane; Justin J Baraboo; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Daniel Kim Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 4.044