PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the use of immediate postoperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy (IPOIC) after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in Europe. METHODS: Urologists based in five European Union nations were asked to extract information from the records of patients with NMIBC-urothelial carcinoma who received at least one TURBT. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to determine the significant predictors of IPOIC usage. Data were weighted to control for country-to-country and other differences. RESULTS: Overall, 324 urologists (58 France, 72 Germany, 62 Italy, 65 Spain, 67 United Kingdom) were involved; the participation rate was 55 %. Overall, 771 patients received 954 TURBTs (mean-1.2/patient), of which 413 of the TURBTs (43.3 %) were administered IPOIC . Sixty-six of the 413 IPOICs (16.0 %) were for a recurrent tumour. Five of the tested variables were significantly associated with a patient's likelihood of receiving IPOIC after TURBT. Variables in the order of significance are as follows: (1) country (United Kingdom, patients most likely to receive IPOIC; France, least likely); (2) progression risk (physician assessed) [lower-risk conditions (no CIS, tumour < 3 cm) or intermediate risk-more likely]; (3) whether urologist completed a uro-oncology fellowship (completed-more likely); (4) recurrence risk (physician assessed) [higher-risk conditions (≥T2, ≥3 cm, CIS)-more likely]; and (5) physician's NMIBC patients volume (higher volume-more likely). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed wide practice variation and substantial noncompliance with European Association of Urology Guidelines on the use of IPOIC after TURBT for NMIBC.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the use of immediate postoperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy (IPOIC) after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in Europe. METHODS: Urologists based in five European Union nations were asked to extract information from the records of patients with NMIBC-urothelial carcinoma who received at least one TURBT. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to determine the significant predictors of IPOIC usage. Data were weighted to control for country-to-country and other differences. RESULTS: Overall, 324 urologists (58 France, 72 Germany, 62 Italy, 65 Spain, 67 United Kingdom) were involved; the participation rate was 55 %. Overall, 771 patients received 954 TURBTs (mean-1.2/patient), of which 413 of the TURBTs (43.3 %) were administered IPOIC . Sixty-six of the 413 IPOICs (16.0 %) were for a recurrent tumour. Five of the tested variables were significantly associated with a patient's likelihood of receiving IPOIC after TURBT. Variables in the order of significance are as follows: (1) country (United Kingdom, patients most likely to receive IPOIC; France, least likely); (2) progression risk (physician assessed) [lower-risk conditions (no CIS, tumour < 3 cm) or intermediate risk-more likely]; (3) whether urologist completed a uro-oncology fellowship (completed-more likely); (4) recurrence risk (physician assessed) [higher-risk conditions (≥T2, ≥3 cm, CIS)-more likely]; and (5) physician's NMIBC patients volume (higher volume-more likely). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed wide practice variation and substantial noncompliance with European Association of Urology Guidelines on the use of IPOIC after TURBT for NMIBC.
Authors: Willem Oosterlinck; Richard Sylvester; Marco Babjuk; Eero Kaasinen; Andreas Böhle; Juan Palou-Redorta; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Savino M Di Stasi; Marco Valenti; Cristian Verri; Emanuele Liberati; Arcangelo Giurioli; Gioia Leprini; Francesco Masedu; Antonio R Ricci; Francesco Micali; Giuseppe Vespasiani Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Maurizio Brausi; J Alfred Witjes; Donald Lamm; Raj Persad; Joan Palou; Marc Colombel; Roger Buckley; Mark Soloway; Hideyuki Akaza; Andreas Böhle Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Marko Babjuk; Maximilian Burger; Richard Zigeuner; Shahrokh F Shariat; Bas W G van Rhijn; Eva Compérat; Richard J Sylvester; Eero Kaasinen; Andreas Böhle; Joan Palou Redorta; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Karim Chamie; Christopher S Saigal; Julie Lai; Jan M Hanley; Claude M Setodji; Badrinath R Konety; Mark S Litwin Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Diego M Carrion; Juan Gómez Rivas; Cristina Ballesteros Ruiz; Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Alfredo Aguilera Bazán; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro Journal: Int J Surg Protoc Date: 2020-10-17