Literature DB >> 23906274

Incidence of postoperative infections requiring reoperation after arthroscopic knee surgery.

Michael G Yeranosian1, Frank A Petrigliano, Rodney D Terrell, Jeffrey C Wang, David R McAllister.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to determine the incidence of infection requiring reoperation after arthroscopic knee surgery during a 6-year period and to compare infection rates across different age groups, genders, geographic regions of the United States, and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes through a retrospective review of a large insurance company database.
METHODS: A retrospective review of an insurance company database was performed for all knee arthroscopies performed in the United States from 2004 to 2009. The database was first queried for all knee arthroscopies, and the number of those cases requiring additional surgery for infection within 30 days was determined to calculate the incidence of infection. The incidence was stratified by gender, age group, region within the United States, and CPT code. A separate analysis for procedures using allografts was also performed.
RESULTS: A total of 432,038 arthroscopic surgeries were performed, and the number of infections requiring drainage was 638, for an overall incidence of infection from 2004 to 2009 of 0.15%. Among adults, men were affected almost twice as often as women (P < .001), and among children, boys were affected almost 3 times as often as girls (P < .001). A decreasing incidence was noted in patients 60 years or older between 2004 and 2009 (P = .01). Overall, the incidence did not significantly vary by age, region, or CPT codes that specified the implantation of allograft tissue. Compared with diagnostic arthroscopy, the relative risk of infection was higher for CPT-29889 (posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of infection requiring reoperation after knee arthroscopy from 2004 to 2009 was 0.15%. The incidence was higher among male patients in both the adult and pediatric populations. The incidence of infection decreased from 2004 to 2009 in patients 60 years or older. Among adult patients, the incidence did not vary by age, by region, or by CPT codes that involved implantation of allografts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, cross-sectional study.
Copyright © 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23906274     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  14 in total

1.  Inside-Out Trans-Arthroscopic Drain Application During Knee Joint Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Gian M Salzmann; Stefan Preiss; Laurent P Harder; Florian D Naal
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-02

2.  Variance in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Selection based on Patient Demographics and Location within the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network Cohort.

Authors:  Darby A Houck; Matthew J Kraeutler; Armando F Vidal; Eric C McCarty; Jonathan T Bravman; Michelle L Wolcott
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Meniscus repairs can be saved in the event of postoperative septic arthritis.

Authors:  Philipp Schuster; Markus Geßlein; Michael Schlumberger; Philipp Mayer; Hermann Josef Bail; Jörg Richter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Septic arthritis after arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament and multi-ligament reconstructions is rare and can be successfully treated with arthroscopic irrigation and debridement: analysis of 866 reconstructions.

Authors:  Philipp Schuster; Markus Geßlein; Philipp Mayer; Michael Schlumberger; Raul Mayr; Jörg Richter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Risk Factors and Complications for Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Natalie L Leong; Shelby Sumner; Ani Gowd; Gregory P Nicholson; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-02-28

Review 6.  Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms.

Authors:  J B Thorlund; C B Juhl; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-06-16

7.  Operative Management of Patellar Instability in the United States: An Evaluation of National Practice Patterns, Surgical Trends, and Complications.

Authors:  Armin Arshi; Jeremiah R Cohen; Jeffrey C Wang; Sharon L Hame; David R McAllister; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 8.  Knee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Gordon H Guyatt; Rachelle Buchbinder; Rudolf W Poolman; Stefan Schandelmaier; Yaping Chang; Behnam Sadeghirad; Nathan Evaniew; Per O Vandvik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Knee Septic Arthritis after Arthroscopy: Incidence, Risk Factors, Functional Outcome, and Infection Eradication Rate.

Authors:  G Balato; S L Di Donato; T Ascione; A D'Addona; F Smeraglia; G Di Vico; D Rosa
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-07-28

10.  Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms.

Authors:  J B Thorlund; C B Juhl; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.