Literature DB >> 23906213

Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae.

P Brinckmann1, M Biggemann, D Hilweg.   

Abstract

The axial compressive strength of 98 motion segments of human thoracolumbar spines was measured in vitro under conditions simulating the in vivo environment. In addition, the density of the trabecular bone in the midplane of the vertebrae was determined by quantitative computed tomography; the areas of the vertebral endplates were measured by computed tomography as well as by photographic methods. The results of this experiment show that the compressive strength of human thoracolumbar vertebrae increases in proportion to bone density as well as to the size of the endplates. With knowledge of bone density and endplate area, compressive strength can be predicted with an error of estimate of 1 kN. Since both parameters (bone density as well as endplate area) can be determined in vivo by CT, the data from this experiment allow for an in vivo prediction of the strength of vertebral bodies by noninvasive means. The strength prediction may be employed to quantify the risk of fracture in physically very demanding tasks, to support expert opinion in trauma cases or to assist in therapeutic decisions in severe cases of osteoporosis. In the spine specimens investigated, compressive strength increased in the cranio-caudal direction. Bone density and endplate area data, the predictors of compressive strength, were available from 53 human thoracolumbar spines. It was therefore investigated how these parameters vary in the cranio-caudal direction. Bone density is practically constant in the thoracolumbar spine, while endplate area increases from T10 to L5. The observed cranio-caudal increase in compressive strength is therefore due to the increase in geometric dimensions and not to an increase in bone density. As this pattern was found to be extremely uniform in all spines investigated, a strength prediction of all vertebrae of an individual spine can be based on the density and area measurement of only one vertebra, say of L3; strength of the adjacent vertebrae may then be extrapolated with high accuracy.
Copyright © 1989. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 23906213     DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(89)90071-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  18 in total

1.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Vertebral deformity arising from an accelerated "creep" mechanism.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Phillip Pollintine; Edward Gomm; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Core Stability in Athletes: A Critical Analysis of Current Guidelines.

Authors:  Klaus Wirth; Hagen Hartmann; Christoph Mickel; Elena Szilvas; Michael Keiner; Andre Sander
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Analysis of the load on the knee joint and vertebral column with changes in squatting depth and weight load.

Authors:  Hagen Hartmann; Klaus Wirth; Markus Klusemann
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The role of patient-mode high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography indices in the prediction of failure strength of the elderly women's thoracic vertebral body.

Authors:  Y Lu; M Krause; N Bishop; K Sellenschloh; C-C Glüer; K Püschel; M Amling; M M Morlock; G Huber
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Too Fit To Fracture: outcomes of a Delphi consensus process on physical activity and exercise recommendations for adults with osteoporosis with or without vertebral fractures.

Authors:  L M Giangregorio; S McGill; J D Wark; J Laprade; A Heinonen; M C Ashe; N J MacIntyre; A M Cheung; K Shipp; H Keller; R Jain; A Papaioannou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Abnormal stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs following damage to the vertebral bodies: a cause of disc failure?

Authors:  M A Adams; D S McNally; J Wagstaff; A E Goodship
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures.

Authors:  S P Nielsen; F Hermansen; O Bärenholdt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Intervertebral disc degeneration: evidence for two distinct phenotypes.

Authors:  Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Prediction of lumbar vertebral body compressive strength of overweight and obese older adults using morphed subject-specific finite-element models to evaluate the effects of weight loss.

Authors:  Samantha L Schoell; Kristen M Beavers; Daniel P Beavers; Leon Lenchik; Anthony P Marsh; W Jack Rejeski; Joel D Stitzel; Ashley A Weaver
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.