Literature DB >> 23905949

Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Un Yong Choi1, Jeong Yoon Park, Kyung Hyun Kim, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Yong Eun Cho.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Clinical results for unilateral pedicle screw fixation after lumbar interbody fusion have been reported to be as good as those for bilateral instrumentation. However, no studies have directly compared unilateral and bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The purpose of this study was to determine whether unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is comparable with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in 1-segment MIS TLIF.
METHODS: This was a prospective randomized study of 53 patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation after MIS TLIF for 1-segment lumbar degenerative disc disease. Twenty-six patients were assigned to a unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group and 27 patients were assigned to a bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group. Operative time, blood loss, clinical outcomes (that is, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] and visual analog scale [VAS] scores), complication rates, and fusion rates were assessed using CT scanning 2 years after surgical treatment.
RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and operated level, and they did not differ significantly in the length of follow-up (27.5 [Group 1] vs 28.9 [Group 2] months) or clinical results. Both groups showed substantial improvements in VAS and ODI scores 2 years after surgical treatment. The groups differed significantly in operative time (unilateral 84.2 minutes; bilateral 137.6 minutes), blood loss (unilateral 92.7 ml; bilateral, 232.0 ml), fusion rate (unilateral 84.6%; bilateral 96.3%), and postoperative scoliotic change (unilateral 23.1%; bilateral 3.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral and bilateral screw fixation after MIS TLIF produced similar clinical results. Although perioperative results were better with unilateral screw fixation, the long-term results were better with bilateral screw fixation, suggesting bilateral screw fixation is a better choice after MIS TLIF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23905949     DOI: 10.3171/2013.2.FOCUS12398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying-Chao Han; Zhu-Qing Liu; Shan-Jin Wang; Li-Jun Li; Jun Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Weibin Shi; Chun Jiang; Zixian Chen; Fubing Liu; Zhenzhou Feng; Xiaoxing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in short-segment lumbar spinal fusion: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Zengfeng Xin; Weixu Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): A review of indications, technique, results and complications.

Authors:  Bhavuk Garg; Nishank Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-01-14

Review 5.  Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gun Keorochana; Kitipong Setrkraising; Patarawan Woratanarat; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with cage fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Wen Xiao; Hua Jiang; Li-Jing Yang; Zeng-Ming Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparative Analysis of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in TLIF for Lumbar Degenerative Disorder: Single Center Large Series.

Authors:  Vigneshwara Badikillaya; Keyur K Akbari; Pramod Sudarshan; Hardik Suthar; Muralidharan Venkatesan; Sajan K Hegde
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

8.  History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Michael C Prabhu; Kevin C Jacob; Madhav R Patel; Hanna Pawlowski; Nisheka N Vanjani; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

9.  What Affects Segmental Lordosis of the Surgical Site after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Authors:  Soo-Heon Kim; Bang Sang Hahn; Jeong-Yoon Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.052

Review 10.  Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Robert W Molinari; Ahmed Saleh; Robert Molinari; Jeff Hermsmeyer; Joseph R Dettori
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.