Literature DB >> 23904752

Reliability of a seated three-dimensional passive intervertebral motion test for mobility, end-feel, and pain provocation in patients with cervicalgia.

Dana M Manning1, Gregory S Dedrick, Phillip S Sizer, Jean-Michel Brismée.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Neck pain can be evaluated with passive intervertebral motion (PIVM). No study has evaluated the reliability of three-dimensional (3D) segmental PIVM testing of the cervical spine in symptomatic subjects in a functional, seated position. The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability of such 3D PIVM technique for pain provocation, hypomobility, and end-feel detection.
METHODS: Subjects (n = 63), age 44±15·6 years, neck pain 3·4±1·6 cm with visual analog scale, were evaluated by two of three raters with varied manual therapy education and experience. To perform the test, the rater passively invoked side-bending motion at each cervical joint from C2-C3 to C6-C7, allowing segmental synkinetic rotation and extension to occur. Each joint was assessed for hypomobility, hard end-feel, and pain provocation. Kappa statistics were used to determine the inter-rater reliability for each variable for joints C2-C3 through C6-C7 for both the most painful and least painful sides.
RESULTS: Percent agreements for pain provocation, hypomobility, and end-feel ranged 65-83%, 62-84%, and 68-87%, respectively. Kappa values for pain provocation, hypomobility, and end-feel on the most painful side were fair to moderate (0·29-0·53, 0·21-0·48, and 0·25-0·50, respectively), and on the least painful side were fair to substantial (0·43-0·65, 0·33-0·58, and 0·28-0·60, respectively). DISCUSSION: This is the first investigation to assess reliability of 3D cervical segmental testing in sitting and to assess reliability of end-feel. The seated 3D PIVM test has sufficient clinical reliability for use in patients with cervicalgia for the assessment of hypomobility, end-feel, and pain provocation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervicalgia; Manual therapy; Passive motion; Reliability

Year:  2012        PMID: 23904752      PMCID: PMC3419570          DOI: 10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  30 in total

Review 1.  Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  E van Trijffel; Q Anderegg; P M M Bossuyt; C Lucas
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2005-07-01

Review 2.  Coupling behavior of the cervical spine: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Chad Cook; Eric Hegedus; Christopher Showalter; Phillip S Sizer
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: intent and validity.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott; Timothy W Flynn; Julie M Fritz; Wayne A Hing; Duncan Reid; Julie M Whitman
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2007-11-07

Review 4.  Spinal motion palpation: a comparison of studies that assessed intersegmental end feel vs excursion.

Authors:  Michael T Haneline; Robert Cooperstein; Morgan Young; Kristopher Birkeland
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of the neck.

Authors:  L E Strender; M Lundin; K Nell
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  [Lateral fexion in the diagnosis of dynamic disorders of the cervical spine].

Authors:  J Jirout
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 0.531

7.  The validity of manual examination in assessing patients with neck pain.

Authors:  Wade King; Peter Lau; Richard Lees; Nikolai Bogduk
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Lucas Hoving; Bart W Koes; Henrica C W de Vet; Danielle A W M van der Windt; Willem J J Assendelft; Henk van Mameren; Walter L J M Devillé; Jan J M Pool; Rob J P M Scholten; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-21       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Correlation among physical impairments, pain, disability, and patient satisfaction in patients with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Thomas T Chiu; Tai-Hing Lam; Anthony J Hedley
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Authors:  H Vernon; S Mior
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pain and Vertebral Dysfunction in Dry Immersion: A Model of Microgravity Simulation Different from Bed Rest Studies.

Authors:  L Treffel; N Massabuau; K Zuj; M-A Custaud; G Gauquelin-Koch; S Blanc; C Gharib; C Millet
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Neuroimmune responses following joint mobilisation and manipulation in people with persistent neck pain: a protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Ivo J Lutke Schipholt; Gwendolyne Scholten-Peeters; Hetty Bontkes; Michel W Coppieters
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.