Literature DB >> 23904696

A Paradigm Shift to Check the Increasing Trend of Cesarean Delivery is the Need of Hour: But How?

Sudarsan Saha1, Soma Saha, Rupkamal Das, Mayoukh Chakraborty, Himadri Sekhar Bala, Priyankar Naskar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To check the progressive increasing trend of caesarean delivery in a tertiary facility care centre. AIMS: The purpose of this study is to implement a paradigm shift in caesarean delivery by introducing a new classification system and a check list based management protocol.
METHODS: The study was conducted from 1st January, 2007 to 31st December, 2008 at CNMC G&O Department. All deliveries in the year 2007 were compared retrospectively and all deliveries in the year 2008 under prospective study with implementation of a new strategic protocol. Comparative audit and analysis of deliveries in retrospective and prospective year reveals significant changes in the caesarean delivery rate.
RESULTS: In retrospective group all women in labour were allowed for spontaneous delivery and in prospective group all women were subjected to intervention protocol and caesarean delivery done in both the groups in need for risk of fetal and maternal salvage. Incidence of caesarean delivery (CD) in retrospective group was 29 % while in the prospective group it was 18.4 %. Marked decrease in CD was observed for augmentation, induction and trial of labour (TOL) for delivery in prospective group. The result was compared with Robson's studies following similar type of classification system.
CONCLUSION: Marked improvement was noticed in this new paradigm and more multicentric trial is needed to check the increasing trend of CD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean delivery (CD); Check based protocol; Paradigm shift; Ten group classification; Trial of labour (TOL); VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section)

Year:  2012        PMID: 23904696      PMCID: PMC3500955          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-012-0288-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  10 in total

1.  A high rate of caesarean sections in an affluent section of Chennai: is it cause for concern?

Authors:  M Pai; P Sundaram; K K Radhakrishnan; K Thomas; J P Muliyil
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.537

2.  Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?

Authors:  M S Robson
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.237

3.  High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population-based cross sectional study.

Authors:  S Sreevidya; B W C Sathiyasekaran
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  A critical appraisal of cesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India.

Authors:  I Kambo; N Bedi; B S Dhillon; N C Saxena
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors.

Authors:  Renate M E Häger; Anne K Daltveit; Dag Hofoss; Stein T Nilsen; Toril Kolaas; Pål Øian; Tore Henriksen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Evidence-based vaginal birth after Caesarean section.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Jason Hashima; Patricia Osterweil
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 5.237

7.  Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates.

Authors:  M S Robson; I W Scudamore; S M Walsh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Primary nonmedically indicated cesarean section ("section on request"): evidence based or modern vogue?

Authors:  Sorina Grisaru; Arnon Samueloff
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 9.  Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Joseph R Wax; Angelina Cartin; Michael G Pinette; Jacquelyn Blackstone
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Comparing rates of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success, and fetal and maternal complications among family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  Balbina Russillo; Maida J Sewitch; Linda Cardinal; Normand Brassard
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2008-02
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  A reflection on current obstetrics and gynaecology research in India.

Authors:  Juan F Pacheco-Páramo; Jon Cornwall
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2013-12-31

2.  Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications.

Authors:  Shiba Mittal; Sachin Pardeshi; Niranjan Mayadeo; Janki Mane
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-01-03

3.  Proposing a Hybrid Model Based on Robson's Classification for Better Impact on Trends of Cesarean Deliveries.

Authors:  Punit Hans; Renu Rohatgi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-11-21

4.  Segregation of Patients for Intrapartum Monitoring, using Robson's Classification.

Authors:  Khushboo Vikram Kandhari; Rahul Vishwanath Mayekar; Archana Anilkumar Bhosale; Yogeshwar Sadashiv Nandanwar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  High Time for Routine Implementation of the Robson Ten-Group Classification for Cesarean Sections Reporting in India!!!

Authors:  Divya Pandey
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-11-10

6.  DECIDE: a cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce non-medically indicated caesareans in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Charles Kaboré; Valéry Ridde; Séni Kouanda; Ludovic Queuille; Paul-André Somé; Isabelle Agier; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; Joao Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania's experience.

Authors:  Justina Kacerauskiene; Egle Bartuseviciene; Dalia Regina Railaite; Meile Minkauskiene; Arnoldas Bartusevicius; Mindaugas Kliucinskas; Renata Simoliuniene; Ruta J Nadisauskiene
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.