Literature DB >> 23904102

Implementation of a laborist program and evaluation of the effect upon cesarean delivery.

Brian K Iriye1, Wilson H Huang, Jennifer Condon, Lyle Hancock, Judy K Hancock, Mark Ghamsary, Thomas J Garite.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laborist programs have expanded throughout the United States in the last decade. Meanwhile, there has been no published research examining their effect on patient outcomes. Cesarean delivery is a key performance metric with maternal health implications and significant financial impact. Our hypothesis is that the initiation of a full-time dedicated laborist staff decreases cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: In a tertiary hospital staffed with private practice physicians, data were retrospectively reviewed for 3 time periods from 2006 through 2011. The first period (16 months) there were no laborists (traditional model), followed by 14 months of continuous in-hospital laborist coverage provided by community staff (community laborist), and finally a 24-month period with full-time laborists providing continuous in-hospital coverage. The primary hypothesis was that full-time laborists would decrease cesarean delivery rates.
RESULTS: Data from 6206 term nulliparous patients were retrospectively reviewed. The cesarean delivery rate for no laborist care was 39.2%, for community physician laborist care was 38.7%, and for full-time laborists was 33.2%. With adjustment via logistic regression, full-time laborist presence was associated with a significant reduction in cesarean delivery when contrasted with no laborist (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.83; P < .0001) or community laborist care (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.87; P < .001). The community laborist model was not associated with an effect upon cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSION: A dedicated full-time laborist staff model is associated with lower rates of cesarean delivery. These findings may be used as part of a strategy to reduce cesarean delivery, lower maternal morbidity and mortality, and decrease health care costs.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; hospitalist; laborist; patient safety

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23904102     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  The Role of the Gastroenterology Hospitalist in Modern Practice.

Authors:  Michelle Hughes; Edward Sun; Sarah Enslin; Vivek Kaul
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-11

2.  Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Judy Jou; Katy B Kozhimannil; Pamela Jo Johnson; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.

Authors:  Torri D Metz; Amanda A Allshouse; Sara A Babcock Gilbert; Reina Doyle; Angie Tong; J Christopher Carey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Appropriateness of elective caesarean deliveries in a perinatal network: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Françoise Vendittelli; Marie-Caroline Tassié; Laurent Gerbaud; Didier Lémery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Factors Associated with Meeting Obstetric Care Consensus Guidelines for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Births.

Authors:  Tiffany Wang; Inga Brown; Jim Huang; Tetsuya Kawakita; Michael Moxley
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  Cesarean delivery rate and staffing levels of the maternity unit.

Authors:  Saad Zbiri; Patrick Rozenberg; François Goffinet; Carine Milcent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of an Obstetrical Hospitalist Program on the Safety Events in a Mid-Sized Obstetrical Unit.

Authors:  Julie Z Decesare; Suzanne Y Bush; Ashley N Morton
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.243

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.