Literature DB >> 23903752

Breaking a vicious cycle.

Daniel F Hayes1, Jeff Allen, Carolyn Compton, Gary Gustavsen, Debra G B Leonard, Robert McCormack, Lee Newcomer, Kristin Pothier, David Ransohoff, Richard L Schilsky, Ellen Sigal, Sheila E Taube, Sean R Tunis.   

Abstract

Despite prodigious advances in tumor biology research, few tumor-biomarker tests have been adopted as standard clinical practice. This lack of reliable tests stems from a vicious cycle of undervaluation, resulting from inconsistent regulatory standards and reimbursement, as well as insufficient investment in research and development, scrutiny of biomarker publications by journals, and evidence of analytical validity and clinical utility. We offer recommendations designed to serve as a roadmap to break this vicious cycle and call for a national dialogue, as changes in regulation, reimbursement, investment, peer review, and guidelines development require the participation of all stakeholders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23903752     DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  38 in total

1.  The Challenges of Validating in Precision Medicine: The Case of Excision Repair Cross-Complement Group 1 Diagnostic Testing.

Authors:  Brianna Barsanti-Innes; Spencer Phillips Hey; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-10-24

Review 2.  An evaluation of regulatory and commercial barriers to stratified medicine development and adoption.

Authors:  N A Meadows; A Morrison; D A Brindley; A Schuh; R W Barker
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  PACE Continuous Innovation Indicators-a novel tool to measure progress in cancer treatments.

Authors:  Silvia Paddock; Lauren Brum; Kathleen Sorrow; Samuel Thomas; Susan Spence; Catharina Maulbecker-Armstrong; Clifford Goodman; Michael Peake; Gordon McVie; Gary Geipel; Rose Li
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-01-07

Review 4.  Mass spectrometry imaging to detect lipid biomarkers and disease signatures in cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Holzlechner; Eliseo Eugenin; Brendan Prideaux
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12

Review 5.  Biomarker validation and testing.

Authors:  Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 6.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Microenvironmental Influences on Metastasis Suppressor Expression and Function during a Metastatic Cell's Journey.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Carolyn J Vivian; Amanda E Brinker; Kelsey R Hampton; Evi Lianidou; Danny R Welch
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2014-06-18

Review 8.  Measuring midkine: the utility of midkine as a biomarker in cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  D R Jones
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transition-associated secretory phenotype predicts survival in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Ajaya Kumar Reka; Guoan Chen; Richard C Jones; Ravi Amunugama; Sinae Kim; Alla Karnovsky; Theodore J Standiford; David G Beer; Gilbert S Omenn; Venkateshwar G Keshamouni
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 10.  Implementing Liquid Biopsies in Clinical Trials: State of Affairs, Opportunities, and Challenges.

Authors:  Maryam B Lustberg; Daniel G Stover; Jeffrey J Chalmers
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.