OBJECTIVE: The need for age-adjusted and/or sex-adjusted reference values in dopamine transporter (DAT) and dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in a longitudinal study of parkinsonian diseases was investigated. We used two different image evaluation tools with a cross-sectional and longitudinal statistical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline DAT and/or D2R SPECT were performed in 51 healthy controls (HC), age-matched to patients in an ongoing prospective study on idiopathic parkinsonism. Twenty-four HC were re-examined after 3 years and 21 HC were examined again after 5 years. SPECT was performed with I-FP-Cit and I-IBZM on a two-headed hybrid gamma camera. Regions of interest and volumes of interest (VOIs) were used for image evaluation. A cross-sectional and longitudinal statistical analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Fewer sex-based differences and less age dependency were seen in DAT SPECT uptake ratios compared with D2R SPECT uptake ratios and when comparing uptake ratios obtained with regions of interest against those with VOIs. In the cross-sectional analysis, a significant age-dependent decline was seen in women in both DAT and D2R uptakes with the VOI method but not in men with either evaluation method. In the longitudinal dataset, both a slight decline and increase over time were seen in DAT uptake; however, a general pattern of decrease was seen in both men and women in D2R uptake. CONCLUSION: The choice of the image evaluation method can influence the pattern of sex-based and age-related differences. The results speak for the use of age-stratified reference values for women, in particular when using a VOI method.
OBJECTIVE: The need for age-adjusted and/or sex-adjusted reference values in dopamine transporter (DAT) and dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in a longitudinal study of parkinsonian diseases was investigated. We used two different image evaluation tools with a cross-sectional and longitudinal statistical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline DAT and/or D2R SPECT were performed in 51 healthy controls (HC), age-matched to patients in an ongoing prospective study on idiopathic parkinsonism. Twenty-four HC were re-examined after 3 years and 21 HC were examined again after 5 years. SPECT was performed with I-FP-Cit and I-IBZM on a two-headed hybrid gamma camera. Regions of interest and volumes of interest (VOIs) were used for image evaluation. A cross-sectional and longitudinal statistical analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Fewer sex-based differences and less age dependency were seen in DAT SPECT uptake ratios compared with D2R SPECT uptake ratios and when comparing uptake ratios obtained with regions of interest against those with VOIs. In the cross-sectional analysis, a significant age-dependent decline was seen in women in both DAT and D2R uptakes with the VOI method but not in men with either evaluation method. In the longitudinal dataset, both a slight decline and increase over time were seen in DAT uptake; however, a general pattern of decrease was seen in both men and women in D2R uptake. CONCLUSION: The choice of the image evaluation method can influence the pattern of sex-based and age-related differences. The results speak for the use of age-stratified reference values for women, in particular when using a VOI method.
Authors: Nicolas Nicastro; Valentina Garibotto; Antoine Poncet; Simon Badoud; Pierre R Burkhard Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Helen Schmitz-Steinkrüger; Catharina Lange; Ivayla Apostolova; Franziska L Mathies; Lars Frings; Susanne Klutmann; Sabine Hellwig; Philipp T Meyer; Ralph Buchert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: E Zoons; M A J Tijssen; Y E M Dreissen; J D Speelman; M Smit; J Booij Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Elena Diekämper; Britta Brix; Winfried Stöcker; Stefan Vielhaber; Imke Galazky; Michael C Kreissl; Philipp Genseke; Emrah Düzel; Péter Körtvelyessy Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Susanna Jakobson Mo; Jan Axelsson; Lars Jonasson; Anne Larsson; Mattias J Ögren; Margareta Ögren; Andrea Varrone; Linda Eriksson; David Bäckström; Sara Af Bjerkén; Jan Linder; Katrine Riklund Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: David Bäckström; Gabriel Granåsen; Magdalena Eriksson Domellöf; Jan Linder; Susanna Jakobson Mo; Katrine Riklund; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Lars Forsgren Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David Bäckström; Jan Linder; Susanna Jakobson Mo; Katrine Riklund; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Lars Forsgren; Niklas Lenfeldt Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 11.800