Literature DB >> 23903557

A literature review of 18F-fluoride PET/CT and 18F-choline or 11C-choline PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.

Maurits Wondergem1, Friso M van der Zant, Tjeerd van der Ploeg, Remco J J Knol.   

Abstract

Although the detection of early bone metastases in men with prostate cancer remains a challenge in today's medicine, current guidelines state that bone scintigraphy with Tc-phosphonates (Tc-BS) is the most sensitive method for assessing bone metastases in these patients. In general, it is stated that bone scintigraphy has reasonable sensitivity and low specificity. The aim of this study was to present a review of the contemporary literature on the performance of F-fluoride and C-choline or F-choline and to reconsider the arguments based on which the present European and US guidelines are founded. A literature search was conducted using the Medline database. Data were taken from eligible studies and the level of evidence was scored. Data were pooled to calculate the weighted sensitivity and specificity. Thirteen studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. On a lesion basis, we found a sensitivity and specificity of 84.0 and 97.7% for C-choline and F-choline and 88.6 and 90.7% for F-fluoride, respectively. On a patient basis, the sensitivity and specificity were 85.2 and 96.5% for C-choline and F-choline and 86.9 and 79.9% for F-fluoride, respectively. No significant differences were found between the sensitivity and specificity of C-choline or F-choline and F-fluoride. There was large inconsistency in the reported sensitivity (range 39-100%) and specificity (range 57-80%) for Tc-BS. The literature provides evidence for superior detection of bone metastases by both F-fluoride PET and F-choline or C-choline PET with or without computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional Tc-BS. Guidelines should include F-fluoride PET/CT and C-choline or F-choline PET/CT as alternatives for Tc-BS for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23903557     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328364918a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  35 in total

1.  Radiotherapy for isolated lymph node metastases in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after primary therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Henkenberens; Axel S Merseburger; Frank Bengel; Thorsten Derlin; Katja Hueper; Viktor Grünwald; Hans Christiansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Diagnostic test accuracy study of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT, 99mTc-labelled diphosphonate SPECT/CT, and planar bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Randi F Fonager; Helle D Zacho; Niels C Langkilde; Joan Fledelius; June A Ejlersen; Christian Haarmark; Helle W Hendel; Mine Benedicte Lange; Mads R Jochumsen; Jesper C Mortensen; Lars J Petersen
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-01

3.  (68)Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT-based radiotherapy in locally recurrent and recurrent oligometastatic prostate cancer : Early efficacy after primary therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Henkenberens; Christoph A von Klot; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Axel S Merseburger; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Hans Christiansen; Thorsten Derlin
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in comparison with 18F-fluoride-PET/CT and whole-body MRI for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Eva Dyrberg; Helle W Hendel; Tri Hien Viet Huynh; Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen; Vibeke B Løgager; Claus Madsen; Erik M Pedersen; Maria Pedersen; Henrik S Thomsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  PET imaging of recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer with novel tracers.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Liza Lindenberg; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 6.  18F-NaF/223RaCl2 theranostics in metastatic prostate cancer: treatment response assessment and prediction of outcome.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Patrick M Colletti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Prostate Cancer Imaging with Novel PET Tracers.

Authors:  Liza Lindenberg; Peter Choyke; William Dahut
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Prospective comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT and diffusion weighted-MRI at for the detection of bone metastases in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Helle D Zacho; Julie B Nielsen; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Uwe Haberkorn; Nandita deSouza; Katja De Paepe; Katja Dettmann; Niels C Langkilde; Christian Haarmark; Rune V Fisker; Dennis T Arp; Jesper Carl; Jørgen B Jensen; Lars J Petersen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  [Focus on molecular imaging in prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Michaud; K A Touijer
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 0.915

10.  Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-NaF PET: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Christie Lin; Tyler Bradshaw; Timothy Perk; Stephanie Harmon; Jens Eickhoff; Ngoneh Jallow; Peter L Choyke; William L Dahut; Steven Larson; John Laurence Humm; Scott Perlman; Andrea B Apolo; Michael J Morris; Glenn Liu; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.