Literature DB >> 2390158

The use and abuse of the emergency ambulance service: some of the factors affecting the decision whether to call an emergency ambulance.

G J Gardner1.   

Abstract

Over a 1-month period all patients arriving in the accident and emergency department by ambulance following a '999' call were questioned using a standard proforma. They were assessed as to whether their medical condition warranted ambulance transfer. A number of social and practical points were analyzed to see whether they would identify any group of patients who used the emergency service without medical need. Overall 289 patients were questioned. Of these 178 (62%) were considered to have medically warranted an ambulance call whereas 111 (38%) did not. A number of features which were more likely to result in an unjustified call were identified. These would suggest that basic knowledge of first aid by the public is poor and should be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2390158      PMCID: PMC1285673          DOI: 10.1136/emj.7.2.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Emerg Med        ISSN: 0264-4924


  3 in total

1.  Ambulance-user analysis in an accident and emergency department.

Authors:  C O'Leary; G Bury; M McCabe; C Kelly; F McGoldrick; F Ward
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  1987-12

2.  Inappropriate use of ambulances.

Authors:  B A Ehrlich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Is the emergency ambulance service abused?

Authors:  D L Morris; A B Cross
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-07-12
  3 in total
  17 in total

Review 1.  Appropriateness of use of emergency ambulances.

Authors:  H Snooks; H Wrigley; S George; E Thomas; H Smith; A Glasper
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-07

2.  Who calls 999 and why? A survey of the emergency workload of the London Ambulance Service.

Authors:  C R Victor; J L Peacock; C Chazot; S Walsh; D Holmes
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-05

3.  What does London need from its ambulance service?

Authors:  R A Cocks; E Glucksman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29

4.  Variations in ambulance use in the United States: the role of health insurance.

Authors:  Zachary F Meisel; Jesse M Pines; Daniel Polsky; Joshua P Metlay; Mark D Neuman; Charles C Branas
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Computer assisted assessment and advice for "non-serious" 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch.

Authors:  J Dale; J Higgins; S Williams; T Foster; H Snooks; R Crouch; C Hartley-Sharpe; E Glucksman; R Hooper; S George
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why?

Authors:  F F Palazzo; O J Warner; M Harron; A Sadana
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-11

7.  Emergency (999) calls to the ambulance service that do not result in the patient being transported to hospital: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  P J Marks; T D Daniel; O Afolabi; G Spiers; J S Nguyen-Van-Tam
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.

Authors:  J Dale; S Williams; T Foster; J Higgins; H Snooks; R Crouch; C Hartley-Sharpe; E Glucksman; S George
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

9.  Emergency ambulance dispatch: is there a case for triage?

Authors:  S Thakore; E A McGugan; W Morrison
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  The barbados emergency ambulance service: high frequency of nontransported calls.

Authors:  Sherwin E Phillips; Pamela S Gaskin; David Byer; W L Cadogan; Andrew Brathwaite; Anders L Nielsen
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 1.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.