Zachary F Meisel1, Jesse M Pines, Daniel Polsky, Joshua P Metlay, Mark D Neuman, Charles C Branas. 1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, the Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. Zachary.Meisel@uphs.upenn.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the associations between individual health insurance and ambulance utilization using a national sample of patients who receive emergency department (ED) care. METHODS: The data source was the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, years 2004 through 2006. Noninstitutionalized patients between ages 18 and 65 years were included. The primary dependent variable was ambulance use. Multivariable logistic regression methods were used to assess the associations between health insurance status and ambulance use and to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 61,013 ED visits were included, representing a national sample of approximately 70 million annual ED visits over 3 years. Ambulance transport was used in 11% of private insurance visits, 16% of Medicaid visits, and 13% of uninsured visits. In the adjusted model, visits by patients with Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.60, 99% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37 to 1.86) and the uninsured (aOR = 1.43, 99% CI = 1.23 to 1.66) were more likely to arrive by ambulance than visits by patients with private insurance. Ambulance use among the uninsured was most pronounced in metropolitan areas. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulance use varies by health insurance status. Medicaid coverage and lack of insurance are each independently associated with increased odds of ambulance use, suggesting a disproportionate role for emergency medical services (EMS) in the care of patients with limited financial resources.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the associations between individual health insurance and ambulance utilization using a national sample of patients who receive emergency department (ED) care. METHODS: The data source was the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, years 2004 through 2006. Noninstitutionalized patients between ages 18 and 65 years were included. The primary dependent variable was ambulance use. Multivariable logistic regression methods were used to assess the associations between health insurance status and ambulance use and to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 61,013 ED visits were included, representing a national sample of approximately 70 million annual ED visits over 3 years. Ambulance transport was used in 11% of private insurance visits, 16% of Medicaid visits, and 13% of uninsured visits. In the adjusted model, visits by patients with Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.60, 99% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37 to 1.86) and the uninsured (aOR = 1.43, 99% CI = 1.23 to 1.66) were more likely to arrive by ambulance than visits by patients with private insurance. Ambulance use among the uninsured was most pronounced in metropolitan areas. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulance use varies by health insurance status. Medicaid coverage and lack of insurance are each independently associated with increased odds of ambulance use, suggesting a disproportionate role for emergency medical services (EMS) in the care of patients with limited financial resources.
Authors: Ivan C Rokos; William J French; William J Koenig; Samuel J Stratton; Beverly Nighswonger; Brian Strunk; Jackie Jewell; Ehtisham Mahmud; James V Dunford; Jon Hokanson; Stephen W Smith; Kenneth W Baran; Robert Swor; Aaron Berman; B Hadley Wilson; Akinyele O Aluko; Brian W Gross; Paul S Rostykus; Angelo Salvucci; Vishva Dev; Bryan McNally; Steven V Manoukian; Spencer B King Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: John G Canto; Robert J Zalenski; Joseph P Ornato; William J Rogers; Catarina I Kiefe; David Magid; Michael G Shlipak; Paul D Frederick; Costas G Lambrew; Katherine A Littrell; Hal V Barron Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-12-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ellen J Weber; Jonathan A Showstack; Kelly A Hunt; David C Colby; Michael L Callaham Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: David R Eitel; Debbie A Travers; Alexander M Rosenau; Nicki Gilboy; Richard C Wuerz Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Roberta Capp; David R West; Kelly Doran; Angela Sauaia; Jennifer Wiler; Tyler Coolman; Adit A Ginde Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Jennifer N Fishe; Eugene Palmer; Erik Finlay; Carmen Smotherman; Shiva Gautam; Phyllis Hendry; Leslie Hendeles Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Amresh D Hanchate; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; K Sophia Dyer; William E Baker; Chen Feng; James Feldman Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Salah S Al-Zaiti; Ziad Faramand; Mohammad O Alrawashdeh; Susan M Sereika; Christian Martin-Gill; Clifton Callaway Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Amy Knowlton; Brian W Weir; Brenna S Hughes; R J Hunter Southerland; Cody W Schultz; Ravi Sarpatwari; Lawrence Wissow; Jonathan Links; Julie Fields; Junette McWilliams; Wade Gaasch Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jonathan D Shenkin; John Warren; Charles Spanbauer; Elaye Okunseri; Aniko Szabo; Christopher Okunseri Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Date: 2018-07-25