BACKGROUND: Based on a hollow-fiber system model of tuberculosis, we hypothesize that microbiologic failure and acquired drug resistance are primarily driven by low drug concentrations that result from pharmacokinetic variability. METHODS: Clinical and pharmacokinetic data were prospectively collected from 142 tuberculosis patients in Western Cape, South Africa. Compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide were identified for each patient. Patients were then followed for up to 2 years. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify and rank clinical predictors of poor long-term outcome such as microbiologic failure or death, or relapse. RESULTS: Drug concentrations and pharmacokinetics varied widely between patients. Poor long-term outcomes were encountered in 35 (25%) patients. The 3 top predictors of poor long-term outcome, by rank of importance, were a pyrazinamide 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ≤ 363 mg·h/L, rifampin AUC ≤ 13 mg·h/L, and isoniazid AUC ≤ 52 mg·h/L. Poor outcomes were encountered in 32/78 patients with the AUC of at least 1 drug below the identified threshold vs 3/64 without (odds ratio = 14.14; 95% confidence interval, 4.08-49.08). Low rifampin and isoniazid peak and AUC concentrations preceded all cases of acquired drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Low drug AUCs are predictive of clinical outcomes in tuberculosis patients.
BACKGROUND: Based on a hollow-fiber system model of tuberculosis, we hypothesize that microbiologic failure and acquired drug resistance are primarily driven by low drug concentrations that result from pharmacokinetic variability. METHODS: Clinical and pharmacokinetic data were prospectively collected from 142 tuberculosispatients in Western Cape, South Africa. Compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide were identified for each patient. Patients were then followed for up to 2 years. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify and rank clinical predictors of poor long-term outcome such as microbiologic failure or death, or relapse. RESULTS: Drug concentrations and pharmacokinetics varied widely between patients. Poor long-term outcomes were encountered in 35 (25%) patients. The 3 top predictors of poor long-term outcome, by rank of importance, were a pyrazinamide 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ≤ 363 mg·h/L, rifampin AUC ≤ 13 mg·h/L, and isoniazid AUC ≤ 52 mg·h/L. Poor outcomes were encountered in 32/78 patients with the AUC of at least 1 drug below the identified threshold vs 3/64 without (odds ratio = 14.14; 95% confidence interval, 4.08-49.08). Low rifampin and isoniazid peak and AUC concentrations preceded all cases of acquired drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Low drug AUCs are predictive of clinical outcomes in tuberculosispatients.
Entities:
Keywords:
classification and regression tree analysis; drug concentrations; hollow-fiber system; nonlinear systems; outcomes; pharmacokinetic variability; tuberculosis
Authors: Helen McIlleron; Peter Wash; André Burger; Jennifer Norman; Peter I Folb; Pete Smith Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Tawanda Gumbo; Arnold Louie; Weiguo Liu; David Brown; Paul G Ambrose; Sujata M Bhavnani; George L Drusano Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-04-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Marianne E Visser; Harleen Ms Grewal; Elizabeth C Swart; Muhammad A Dhansay; Gerhard Walzl; Sonja Swanevelder; Carl Lombard; Gary Maartens Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Alistair D Calver; Alecia A Falmer; Megan Murray; Odelia J Strauss; Elizabeth M Streicher; Madelene Hanekom; Thelma Liversage; Mothusi Masibi; Paul D van Helden; Robin M Warren; Thomas C Victor Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Tawanda Gumbo; Arnold Louie; Mark R Deziel; Weiguo Liu; Linda M Parsons; Max Salfinger; George L Drusano Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-08-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sekai Chideya; Carla A Winston; Charles A Peloquin; William Z Bradford; Philip C Hopewell; Charles D Wells; Arthur L Reingold; Thomas A Kenyon; Themba L Moeti; Jordan W Tappero Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Gustavo E Velásquez; Meredith B Brooks; Julia M Coit; Henry Pertinez; Dante Vargas Vásquez; Epifanio Sánchez Garavito; Roger I Calderón; Judith Jiménez; Karen Tintaya; Charles A Peloquin; Elna Osso; Dylan B Tierney; Kwonjune J Seung; Leonid Lecca; Geraint R Davies; Carole D Mitnick Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ben Knippenberg; Madhu Page-Sharp; Sam Salman; Ben Clark; John Dyer; Kevin T Batty; Timothy M E Davis; Laurens Manning Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: L Lalande; L Bourguignon; S Bihari; P Maire; M Neely; R Jelliffe; S Goutelle Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Alvaro A Ordonez; Hechuan Wang; Gesham Magombedze; Camilo A Ruiz-Bedoya; Shashikant Srivastava; Allen Chen; Elizabeth W Tucker; Michael E Urbanowski; Lisa Pieterse; E Fabian Cardozo; Martin A Lodge; Maunank R Shah; Daniel P Holt; William B Mathews; Robert F Dannals; Jogarao V S Gobburu; Charles A Peloquin; Steven P Rowe; Tawanda Gumbo; Vijay D Ivaturi; Sanjay K Jain Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Geetha Ramachandran; A K Hemanth Kumar; P K Bhavani; T Kannan; S Ramesh Kumar; N Poorana Gangadevi; V V Banurekha; L Sekar; N Ravichandran; G Mathevan; G N Sanjeeva; Rajeshwar Dayal; Soumya Swaminathan Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 5.191